Authors :
Pooja Hukkeri; Dr. Sanjivkumar Pol; Sainath Shivappa Kuratti
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4nh4pk7h
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4nfm9jcv
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug500
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used more in recruitment to help increase the velocity of hiring, as well as improve
accuracy and decision-making speed. The performance of automated resume screening, chatbots, video analytics, and
predictive algorithms make it possible for organizations to handle large candidate volumes and identify more suitable
candidates quickly. Though AI has many advantages, concerns surround fairness, algorithmic transparency, confidentiality
and if human interaction quality will be lowered as a result. This study examines the effectiveness of AI in talent
identification by assessing three aspects: recruitment efficiency, challenges and risks, and predictive accuracy. A
quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 204 HR professionals experienced in AI-enabled recruitment. Using
descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis, the study evaluated whether AI efficiency and AI-related challenges
significantly influence perceptions of AI effectiveness. Results reveal that although respondents hold moderately positive
views toward AI, neither recruitment efficiency nor perceived challenges significantly predict AI’s effectiveness in candidate
suitability assessment. The research suggested that additional factors such as system transparency, organisational digital
maturity and quality of human and AI co-operation had effect on how well an AI system worked. This research contributes
to the growing literature on ethical and responsible AI adoption, and it emphasizes the necessity of recruiting staff based
not only on technological capability but also common sense.
Keywords :
Intelligence in Recruitment, Talent Identification and Selection, Algorithmic Fairness and Transparency, Predictive Hiring Effectiveness, Recruitment Efficiency and Challenges
References :
- Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(5), 1671–1710.
- Ahmed, M., Lillie, A., & Downing, L. (2020). Navigating the future of recruitment. Journal of Business Research, 121, 12–24.
- Arrieta, A. B., et al. (2020). Explainable AI: A review. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
- Basu, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and data privacy in HR. Human Resource Development Review, 20(4), 456–480.
- Bodie, M. T., Cherry, M. A., McCormick, M. L., & Tang, A. (2021). The law and policy of people analytics. University of Colorado Law Review, 92, 651–708.
- Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms. Upturn Report, 1–43.
- Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersecting accuracy disparities. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15.
- Cai, Z., Huang, Q., Liu, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Improving hiring decisions with AI. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106–112.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2019). New talent signals. Harvard Business Review, 97(2), 72–80.
- Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool. Reuters.
Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How AI will change HR. Journal of Business Research, 116, 239–247.
- Hunkenschroer, A., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethical challenges of AI hiring. AI & Society, 37(1), 113–127.
- Johnson, R., et al. (2021). Candidate experiences with automated hiring. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(4), 780–804.
- Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. (2020). Discriminatory biases in algorithmic hiring. Business Research, 13, 795–848.
- Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Machine learning in HRM. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1045–1074.
- Meijerink, J., Bondarouk, T., & Lepak, D. (2021). HRM + AI: Opportunities and challenges. Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 100828.
- Nawaz, N., & Gomes, A. (2020). AI-driven talent sourcing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106–118.
- Newman, D. A., Fast, N. J., & Harmon, V. (2020). Algorithmic management and HR analytics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 20–38.
- Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in hiring algorithms. FAT Conference Proceedings.
- Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2020). AI in recruitment. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(1), 21–36.
- Strohmeier, S. (2020). Digital HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100–106.
- Suen, H. Y., Chen, M. Y., & Lu, S. H. (2019). Does AI improve hiring? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 166–173.
- Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in HR. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 14425.
- van Esch, P., & Black, J. S. (2019). Marketing AI recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(4), 352–364.
- Villarroel Ordenes, F., et al. (2020). Recruitment automation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 50, 1–14.
- Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020). Automation in selection assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 27–47.
- Yao, X. (2021). NLP for HR analytics. Information Processing & Management, 58(4), 102–112.
- Zhang, L., Liao, Q., & Li, M. (2020). Machine learning models for predicting job performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 146, 113140.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used more in recruitment to help increase the velocity of hiring, as well as improve
accuracy and decision-making speed. The performance of automated resume screening, chatbots, video analytics, and
predictive algorithms make it possible for organizations to handle large candidate volumes and identify more suitable
candidates quickly. Though AI has many advantages, concerns surround fairness, algorithmic transparency, confidentiality
and if human interaction quality will be lowered as a result. This study examines the effectiveness of AI in talent
identification by assessing three aspects: recruitment efficiency, challenges and risks, and predictive accuracy. A
quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 204 HR professionals experienced in AI-enabled recruitment. Using
descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis, the study evaluated whether AI efficiency and AI-related challenges
significantly influence perceptions of AI effectiveness. Results reveal that although respondents hold moderately positive
views toward AI, neither recruitment efficiency nor perceived challenges significantly predict AI’s effectiveness in candidate
suitability assessment. The research suggested that additional factors such as system transparency, organisational digital
maturity and quality of human and AI co-operation had effect on how well an AI system worked. This research contributes
to the growing literature on ethical and responsible AI adoption, and it emphasizes the necessity of recruiting staff based
not only on technological capability but also common sense.
Keywords :
Intelligence in Recruitment, Talent Identification and Selection, Algorithmic Fairness and Transparency, Predictive Hiring Effectiveness, Recruitment Efficiency and Challenges