Authors : Dhanya Shree B.; Sejal Turlapati.; Nafiya Taskeen M.; S. Nirmala Devi; Dr. D. P. Sivasakti Balan; Thayumanaswamy

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mwbz6kj7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3z5xdh2b

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun748

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This research paper is a comparison of stone masonry and modern concrete structures, two construction methods that are significant in today's world as they were throughout history. The purpose of this research is to analyze and compare the two construction methods in terms of their respective strength, durability, costs involved, construction methods used, and environmental effects. The methodology applied in this paper will involve the use of a literature review, and the use of data from various sources to compare both methods. The paper will also use information found from textbook materials, as well as information from case studies where each method is contrasted. A study of both construction methods will be made to assess their efficiency and appropriateness for building projects. The results will state that stone masonry is a sustainable and durable construction material but is time and labor intensive, where modern concrete structures provide higher strength, are quick to construct, and are extremely adaptable to most building applications and conditions. The paper will conclude that both materials are viable construction materials, depending on their specific application, and a combination of old and new methods may provide the best application for construction.

Keywords : Concrete, Construction Material, Viability, Durability, Sustainable.

References :

1. Allen, E., & Iano, J. (2019). Fundamentals of building construction: Materials and methods (7th ed.). Wiley.
2. American Concrete Institute. (2019). Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures (TMS 402/602-16). American Concrete Institute.
3. Ching, F. D. K. (2020). Building construction illustrated (6th ed.). Wiley.
4. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Masonry. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/masonry
5. Hendry, A. W. (2001). Structural masonry (2nd ed.). Macmillan Press.
6. International Code Council. (2021). International building code (IBC). International Code Council.
7. Kaushik, H. B., Rai, D. C., & Jain, S. K. (2007). Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9), 728–739.
8. Lawrence, S. J., & Page, A. W. (2000). Bond studies in masonry construction. Construction and Building Materials, 14(7–8), 373–382.
9. National Geographic Society. (n.d.). Rocks and minerals resource library. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/resource-libraryrocks-and-minerals/
10. Sinha, B. P., & Davies, S. R. (2003). Design of masonry structures. CRC Press.
11. The Masonry Society. (2016). Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures (TMS 402/602-16). The Masonry Society.
12. Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Stone masonry. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_masonry