Authors :
Yonatan Bagus Adi Putra; Antonius Setyadi
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3vPQTI9
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975797
Abstract :
Vendors have an important role in Supply
Chain Management which will have an impact on
company performance. One of method that can be used
in vendor selection is the Analytical Hierarchy Process
(AHP) method. This research was conducted at the
company PT Rekadaya Elektrika which is engaged in the
national electric power EPC. The sample of this research
wereall employees in the SCM Unit. The sampling
technique used in this research is judgment
sampling.Based on the results from thisresearch, it was
found that the most influential criteria in the selection of
transmission tower material fabrication vendors were
the priority I is lead time (0.390), priority II is quality
(0.246), priority III is price (0.169), priority IV is
quantity(0.111) and priority V is service (0.084). From
the results of the assessment of alternative priority levels,
priority I is Vendor D (0.386), priority II is Vendor E
(0.230), priority III is Vendor C (0.195), priority IV is
Vendor B (0.105) and priority V is Vendor A
(0.066).Based on the results of the analysis Vendor D is
the vendor that has the highest overall value.
Keywords :
Vendor Selection, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Supply Chain Management, software expert choice.
Vendors have an important role in Supply
Chain Management which will have an impact on
company performance. One of method that can be used
in vendor selection is the Analytical Hierarchy Process
(AHP) method. This research was conducted at the
company PT Rekadaya Elektrika which is engaged in the
national electric power EPC. The sample of this research
wereall employees in the SCM Unit. The sampling
technique used in this research is judgment
sampling.Based on the results from thisresearch, it was
found that the most influential criteria in the selection of
transmission tower material fabrication vendors were
the priority I is lead time (0.390), priority II is quality
(0.246), priority III is price (0.169), priority IV is
quantity(0.111) and priority V is service (0.084). From
the results of the assessment of alternative priority levels,
priority I is Vendor D (0.386), priority II is Vendor E
(0.230), priority III is Vendor C (0.195), priority IV is
Vendor B (0.105) and priority V is Vendor A
(0.066).Based on the results of the analysis Vendor D is
the vendor that has the highest overall value.
Keywords :
Vendor Selection, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Supply Chain Management, software expert choice.
