⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Trade Facilitation and Port Efficiency in Nigeria: A Case-Based Review of Customs Procedures at Apapa, Tin Can, and Onne Ports


Authors : Olugbenga F. Akomolehin; Bolawale V. Akomolehin; Famoroti Ilesanmi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yvtujskb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mrjftdcf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug011

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Efficient port operations are central to lowering trade costs and enhancing competitiveness in developing economies. This study examines how customs procedures and inter-agency coordination influence port efficiency and trade facilitation at Nigeria’s three major seaports—Apapa, Tin Can Island, and Onne. Using a qualitative policy review and comparative case study design, the research analyses documentary evidence from WTO, UNCTAD, World Bank, and national regulatory agencies alongside case-based insights from port operations. Findings reveal that severe congestion, prolonged cargo dwell time, and logistical bottlenecks at Lagos ports stem from infrastructural deficits, complex documentation processes, limited scanning capacity, and inconsistent application of risk management. Inter-agency fragmentation among the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), NIMASA, SON, NDLEA, and terminal operators further compounds delays through duplicative inspections and poor information sharing. In contrast, Onne Port demonstrates more streamlined procedures, reduced congestion, and stronger operational coordination. Assessment of Nigeria’s alignment with WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement provisions shows progress in documentation transparency and electronic payment but highlights persistent gaps in coordinated border management and risk-based clearance. The study contributes to port governance literature by offering an integrated, comparative analysis of customs, logistics, and institutional dynamics across Nigeria’s leading ports. It recommends targeted reforms, including process simplification, enhanced scanning and ICT systems, strengthened joint inspections, and differentiated strategies for Lagos and Onne to improve national trade facilitation outcomes.

Keywords : Trade Facilitation, Port Efficiency, Cargo Dwell Time, Customs Procedures, Coordinated Border Management, WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA).

References :

  1. Adeleke, T., & Odunuga, S. (2022). Institutional dynamics and port governance reforms in Nigeria. Journal of Maritime Policy Studies, 14(2), 45–60.
  2. Adegoke, Y., Olanrewaju, O., & Musa, T. (2024). Cargo dwell time and logistics inefficiencies in Nigerian ports. African Journal of Transport & Logistics, 11(1), 22–38.
  3. Africa CDC. (2023). Cross-border collaboration and risk management framework. African Union Publications.
  4. Chhetri, P. (2025). Container dwell time and global logistics costs: A supply chain analysis. International Journal of Logistics Management, 36(3), 112–130.
  5. da Silva, R., Martinez, J., & Lopez, A. (2024). Evaluating port efficiency using performance indices in developing economies. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 26(1), 78–94.
  6. Desiderio, M. (2025). Border agency coordination in African trade corridors: Lessons for port reforms. Journal of Development Logistics, 9(1), 55–74.
  7. Hezekia, K. (2025). Port congestion and digital transformation in African maritime gateways. Journal of African Maritime Studies, 18(1), 33–49.
  8. Kamau, P., & Otiso, K. (2022). Network governance and port performance in East Africa. Maritime Governance Review, 5(2), 38–57.
  9. Lee, J. (2024). Determinants of cargo dwell time in emerging market ports. Journal of Supply Chain Performance, 33(4), 211–225.
  10. Mbachu, C., Okoro, P., & Ibe, F. (2024). Comparative performance analysis of Nigerian ports. Nigerian Journal of Maritime Transport, 12(1), 88–105.
  11. Matekenya, W. (2025). Technical efficiency of African ports: A frontier analysis. African Maritime Economics Review, 7(3), 99–121.
  12. Nguyen, T. (2025). Operational performance models for modern container terminals. Journal of Port Operations & Engineering, 19(1), 1–17.
  13. Nwokedi, E. (2022). Cargo dwell time and customs performance in Nigerian ports. Journal of African Logistics & Trade, 8(2), 14–32.
  14. Nwaogbe, O., Ezekwe, C., & Iheanacho, N. (2024). Congestion patterns at Lagos ports: An infrastructure and governance perspective. Journal of Transport Infrastructure in Africa, 6(2), 48–67.
  15. Ojo, Y., & Ismail, A. (2023). Digital customs systems and clearance outcomes in Nigeria. West African Journal of Customs Studies, 4(1), 59–75.
  16. Olanrewaju, D., Akinyemi, T., & Lawal, S. (2024). Truck traffic management and port congestion in Lagos. Journal of Urban Logistics & Mobility, 9(1), 14–30.
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Trade facilitation and customs modernization: Global trends and policy directions. OECD Publishing.
  18. Peterson, L. (2020). WTO TFA implementation and clearance time reduction in developing countries. World Trade Review, 19(4), 455–478.
  19. Satria, D., Yuniarto, H., & Rahman, T. (2023). Inter-agency collaboration and port community systems in Southeast Asia. Maritime Systems & Governance, 17(3), 202–219.
  20. Scott, W. R. (2021). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  21. Ugwu, K. (2022). Trade facilitation reforms and SME participation in Nigeria’s import system. Journal of Development Policy & Practice, 12(3), 99–118.
  22. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2022). Trade Facilitation and Development Report. UNCTAD Publishing.
  23. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Single window implementation guide for developing countries. UNCTAD Publishing.
  24. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2025). Review of Maritime Transport. UNCTAD Publishing.
  25. Wang, X. (2023). Digitalisation and port turnaround efficiency in emerging economies. Journal of Maritime Transport Technology, 15(1), 66–84.
  26. Williamson, O. E. (2020). Transaction cost economics and organizational governance. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(2), 231–248.
  27. World Bank. (2022). Container Port Performance Index. World Bank Publications.
  28. World Bank. (2023). Logistics Performance Indicators Report. World Bank Publications.
  29. World Bank. (2024). Trade facilitation and coordinated border management in Africa. World Bank Group.
  30. World Customs Organization. (2022). Coordinated Border Management Compendium. WCO Publications.
  31. World Trade Organization. (2021). Trade Facilitation Agreement: Implementation progress report. WTO Publications.
  32. World Trade Organization. (2024). Nigeria Trade Policy Review. WTO Publications.
  33. I., Johnson, C., & Satterthwaite, D. (2022). Urban poverty, climate risk and adaptation in coastal African cities. Environment and Urbanization, 34(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221077345
  34. Ajala, T. (2021). Urban poverty and spatial exclusion in Lagos, Nigeria: A geospatial perspective. Habitat International, 117, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102414
  35. Alvarado, M., & González, R. (2021). Remote sensing for urban poverty mapping: A case study of informal settlements in Mexico City. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 99, 102342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102342
  36. Bhan, G., & Jana, A. (2022). Slum redevelopment and the reproduction of urban poverty in India. Urban Studies, 59(5), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021996965
  37. Boamah, E., Walker, J., & Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2021). Peri-urban spatial inequality and urban poverty in Accra, Ghana. Cities, 108, 102964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102964
  38. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296. Institute of Development Studies.
  39. Davis, J., & Henderson, V. (2020). Urban poverty dynamics and policy responses in Africa. World Development, 130, 104915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104915
  40. De Sherbinin, A., Van den Hoek, J., & Borkovska, O. (2023). High-resolution poverty mapping using satellite imagery and geospatial models in Africa and Asia. Nature Sustainability, 6(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00944-5
  41. Fox, S. (2019). Understanding the role of urban governance in slum formation: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Urban Research & Practice, 12(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1496026
  42. Fox, S., & Goodfellow, T. (2021). Cities and development in Africa: The spatial politics of poverty. Development and Change, 52(3), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12646
  43. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. Routledge.
  44. Hwang, J., & Lin, J. (2021). Urban renewal and spatial inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, 57(4), 1203–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419895561
  45. Karuri-Sebina, G. (2020). Spatial data governance for inclusive African cities. Environment and Urbanization, 32(2), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820901542
  46. Kühn, M. (2020). Housing policy and spatial inequalities in Berlin: Mapping accessibility to services. Urban Planning, 5(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i2.2748
  47. Lawhon, M., Ernstson, H., & Silver, J. (2020). Urban political ecology in the Global South: Insights and debates. Progress in Human Geography, 44(6), 1006–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519839616
  48. Mengistu, A., & Gebeyehu, A. (2022). Urban growth, displacement, and slum dynamics in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Habitat International, 121, 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102517
  49. Mkhize, N., & Ncube, P. (2020). Post-apartheid spatial segregation and urban poverty in South Africa: A GIS-based study. Urban Forum, 31(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09387-2
  50. Otieno, A., & Makau, J. (2020). Community mapping and spatial justice in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Environment and Urbanization, 32(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820901540
  51. Pérez, M., & Cardona, O. (2020). Evaluating slum upgrading programs in Brazil and Colombia: A spatial equity perspective. World Development, 131, 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104965
  52. Satterthwaite, D., Archer, D., & Dodman, D. (2022). Participatory GIS and urban poverty mapping: Evidence from Kenya, Uganda, and Bangladesh. Urban Studies, 59(8), 1549–1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211017921
  53. Scoones, I. (2015). Sustainable livelihoods and rural development. Practical Action Publishing.
  54. Sietchiping, R., Permezel, M., & Ngomsi, C. (2020). Urban planning, land markets, and spatial inequality in Africa. Urban Studies, 57(12), 2524–2543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019883112
  55. Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
  56. Swyngedouw, E., & Ernstson, H. (2019). Political ecology beyond the urban. Antipode, 51(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12493
  57. Turok, I., & Bailey, D. (2020). Devolution and spatial inequality in the UK. Regional Studies, 54(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1602398
  58. Turok, I., & Borel-Saladin, J. (2019). Spatial inequalities and urban policy in South Africa. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(5), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1501083
  59. UN-Habitat. (2021). Cities and pandemics: Towards a more just, green and healthy future. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/cities-and-pandemics
  60. UN-Habitat. (2023). World cities report 2023: Envisaging the future of cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/wcr
  61. Wiesel, I., & Liu, E. (2021). Affordable housing and spatial disadvantage in Australian cities. Urban Policy and Research, 39(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2020.1861023
  62. Yuliani, S., Susilo, R., & Darmawan, A. (2021). Spatial dynamics of informal settlements in Jakarta: A geospatial analysis. Habitat International, 113, 102381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102381
  63. Abdullahi, M., & Sieng, L. (2023). The impact of infrastructure.

Efficient port operations are central to lowering trade costs and enhancing competitiveness in developing economies. This study examines how customs procedures and inter-agency coordination influence port efficiency and trade facilitation at Nigeria’s three major seaports—Apapa, Tin Can Island, and Onne. Using a qualitative policy review and comparative case study design, the research analyses documentary evidence from WTO, UNCTAD, World Bank, and national regulatory agencies alongside case-based insights from port operations. Findings reveal that severe congestion, prolonged cargo dwell time, and logistical bottlenecks at Lagos ports stem from infrastructural deficits, complex documentation processes, limited scanning capacity, and inconsistent application of risk management. Inter-agency fragmentation among the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), NIMASA, SON, NDLEA, and terminal operators further compounds delays through duplicative inspections and poor information sharing. In contrast, Onne Port demonstrates more streamlined procedures, reduced congestion, and stronger operational coordination. Assessment of Nigeria’s alignment with WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement provisions shows progress in documentation transparency and electronic payment but highlights persistent gaps in coordinated border management and risk-based clearance. The study contributes to port governance literature by offering an integrated, comparative analysis of customs, logistics, and institutional dynamics across Nigeria’s leading ports. It recommends targeted reforms, including process simplification, enhanced scanning and ICT systems, strengthened joint inspections, and differentiated strategies for Lagos and Onne to improve national trade facilitation outcomes.

Keywords : Trade Facilitation, Port Efficiency, Cargo Dwell Time, Customs Procedures, Coordinated Border Management, WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA).

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe