Thermal Performance of XPS and Melamine Materials: A Case Study on Engine Maintenance Cover Application


Authors : Zilan Öner; Ayşegül Kasap; Eda Nur Özer; Gözde Başoğlu; Melek Çınkı

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdcsfp9r

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4anvuawd

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14512787


Abstract : This study investigates the effectiveness of XPS (extruded polystyrene) and melamine materials in improving the thermal insulation performance of motor maintenance covers. The research focuses on thermal analyses aimed at ensuring that motor components operate within optimal temperature ranges by comparing the heat transfer capacities of these materials. The study commenced with the design of the motor maintenance cover, followed by the selection of suitable materials and the determination of process parameters, taking environmental conditions into account. Heat flow analysis was conducted using the defined parameters, and based on the results, the thermal performance of the materials was compared. It was found that XPS, due to its low thermal conductivity, minimizes heat transfer and demonstrates superior thermal insulation performance. Melamine, on the other hand, emerged as a significant option for ensuring safety, as it maintains thermal insulation even at high temperatures. The differences in the thermal performance of both materials were assessed based on the intended application of each material. The study demonstrates that XPS material provides more optimal thermal insulation for motor maintenance covers, enhancing long-term safety. XPS is considered a more suitable option for such applications due to its low thermal conductivity and durability.

Keywords : XPS (Extruded Polystyrene); Melamine; Heat Transfe; Engine Maintenance Cover; Thermal Performancecomponen.

References :

  1. N. V. Marathe, N. H. Walke, S. Juttu, H. B. Chaudhari, S. Dev, and M. P. Samant, Introduction to Thermal Management Techniques. 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-8570-5_1.
  2. S. Sermeno, E. Bideaux, X. Brun, and O. Ameur, “Heavy duty vehicle cooling system auxiliary load management control: An application of linear control strategy (MIMO and SISO),” in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), 2014. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2014-39534.
  3. G. Kaltakkıran, M. Akif Ceviz, and K. Bakirci, “Instantaneous energy balance and performance analysis during warm up period of a spark ignition engine under several thermal energy management strategies,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 269, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116102.
  4. Y. Wang, W. Ma, M. Li, and H. Jin, Method of life prediction of engine cylinder cover, vol. 677. 2013. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.677.236.
  5. P. Hujare, S. Patil, B. Pokharkar, D. Hujare, T. Chavan, and S. Khewale, “Investigation for the effect of stiffener on vibration response of engine cover of vehicle,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, pp. 1743–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.477.
  6. G. Refiadi, I. S. Aisyah, and J. P. Siregar, “Trends in lightweight automotive materials for improving fuel efficiency and reducing carbon emissions,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 78–90, 2019, doi: 10.31603/ae.v2i3.2984.
  7. G. Koutsakis and J. B. Ghandhi, “Optimization of thermal barrier coating performance and durability over a drive cycle,” International Journal of Engine Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1446–1463, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14680874221089072.
  8. S. G. Barbieri, V. Mangeruga, and M. Giacopini, “The Effects of the Specific Material Selection on the Structural Behaviour of the Piston-Liner Coupling of a High Performance Engine,” in SAE Technical Papers, 2021. doi: 10.4271/2021-01-1235.
  9. A. Zouani, M. Magoulick, and B. Shiele, “Development of a thermoplastic cam cover for a 4.0L V6 SOHC engine,” SAE Technical Papers, 2006, doi: 10.4271/2006-01-0709.
  10. N. Bokhari and S. Patel, “Development of a softer molded in color/Paintable RTPO for the Driver Airbag Cover Application,” in Society of Plastics Engineers, Automotive Thermoplastic Polyolefins (TPO) Global Conference 2005, 2006, pp. 59–69.
  11. K. Voith, B. Spisák, M. Petrik, Z. Szamosi, and G. L. Szepesi, “Non-Conventional Reinforced EPS and Its Numerical Examination,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11010012.
  12. H. Wei and Y. Zhang, “Application of a new thermal insulation layer to subgrade,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2022, doi: 10.1680/jtran.18.00016.
  13. M. Koru, “Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Closed-Cell Insulation Materials That Depend on Temperature and Density,” Arab J Sci Eng, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 4337–4346, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13369-016-2122-6.
  14. H.-B. Jeon, I.-H. Lee, G. S. An, and Y.-S. Oh, “Microstructure control and change in thermal conductivity of 8YSZ/SiO2 multi-compositional coating by suspension plasma spraying,” Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 450–454, 2018.
  15. V. Sankar, B. S. G. Thampi, and M. R. R. Panicker, “Optimization of thermal barrier coatings in a single cylinder diesel engine using thermal analysis and genetic algorithm,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012192.
  16. Z. Bi et al., “Improving thermal conductivity of graphene films with assistance of melamine,” J Phys D Appl Phys, vol. 57, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ad0d2d.
  17. V. Nemanič and M. Žumer, “New organic fiber-based core material for vacuum thermal insulation,” Energy Build, vol. 90, pp. 137–141, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.012.
  18. H. Liange, C. Hongling, and S. Wenjun, “Boiling heat transfer-based temperature rise characteristics of automotive permanent magnet synchronous motors at peak operating conditions,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 3691–3699, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12206-022-0643-3.

This study investigates the effectiveness of XPS (extruded polystyrene) and melamine materials in improving the thermal insulation performance of motor maintenance covers. The research focuses on thermal analyses aimed at ensuring that motor components operate within optimal temperature ranges by comparing the heat transfer capacities of these materials. The study commenced with the design of the motor maintenance cover, followed by the selection of suitable materials and the determination of process parameters, taking environmental conditions into account. Heat flow analysis was conducted using the defined parameters, and based on the results, the thermal performance of the materials was compared. It was found that XPS, due to its low thermal conductivity, minimizes heat transfer and demonstrates superior thermal insulation performance. Melamine, on the other hand, emerged as a significant option for ensuring safety, as it maintains thermal insulation even at high temperatures. The differences in the thermal performance of both materials were assessed based on the intended application of each material. The study demonstrates that XPS material provides more optimal thermal insulation for motor maintenance covers, enhancing long-term safety. XPS is considered a more suitable option for such applications due to its low thermal conductivity and durability.

Keywords : XPS (Extruded Polystyrene); Melamine; Heat Transfe; Engine Maintenance Cover; Thermal Performancecomponen.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe