Authors :
Abdulsalam Mala Yakubu; Adamu Tential Salihu; Umar Jiddum Jidda; Khadija Mustapha Hussaini; Muhammad Lawan Wasaram; Alhaji Bukar Baba Shehu
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3sd3rw2x
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4vmzw5wk
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec448
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Biosurfactants, which are surface-active molecules of microbial origin, are garnering significant attention as
sustainable substitutes for synthetic surfactants. Their appeal lies in their inherent biocompatibility, environmental
degradability, and stable performance across a range of physicochemical conditions. A primary impediment to their
industrial adoption, however, is the substantial expense associated with fermentation feedstocks. The present investigation
evaluates the efficacy of groundnut oil, a low-cost agricultural by-product, as an exclusive carbon substrate for the cost-
effective microbial synthesis of biosurfactants. A consortium of a bacterial strains, isolated from hydrocarbon-
contaminated soil, underwent primary screening for biosurfactant production. This screening employed a tripartite
methodological approach: the oil-spreading technique, the drop-collapse assay, and the determination of the emulsification
index (E24). Among the evaluated isolates, Micrococcus sp. strain LB11 demonstrated superior surface-activity traits,
manifesting a 15 mm zone of oil\displacement and a rapid reduction in interfacial tension evidenced by a 45-second drop-
collapse duration. While Alcaligenes faecalis (IS-7) displayed a considerable capacity for emulsion
stabilization, Micrococcus sp. LB11 emerged as the most proficient candidate when propagated in a medium formulated
with groundnut oil. Cultivation of Micrococcus sp. LB11 on this lipid substrate facilitated the generation of a biosurfactant
achieving an E24 value of approximately 65% over a 24-hour incubation period. This quantitative measure of emulsion
stability indicates the synthesis of a high-quality, robust biosurfactant. The magnitude of the emulsifying activity further
suggests the production of a high-molecular-weight compound, potentially possessing a glycoproteinaceous character.
These outcomes collectively validate groundnut oil as a proficient and economical substrate for augmenting biosurfactant
yield. In summary, these findings position Micrococcus sp. LB11 as a highly promising isolate warranting in-depth
biochemical analysis and scale-up exploration. The resultant biosurfactant holds considerable promise for deployment in
environmentally pertinent applications, including but not limited to soil and water bioremediation, microbial-enhanced
hydrocarbon recovery, and various green technological processes.
Keywords :
Micrococcus sp. LB11, Groundnut Oil, Glycoprotein Biosurfactant, Biosurfactant Production, Sustainable Substrate, Emulsification Index (E24), Stable Emulsion Formation, Low-Cost Fermentation, Agro-Industrial Waste Valorization, Microbial Surface-Active Agents.
References :
- Abas, F. W., & Ibrahim, N. (2018). Biosurfactant production from treated palm oil mill effluent (POME) by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005004
- Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M., Lépine, F., & Déziel, E. (2010). Rhamnolipids: Diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 86(5), 1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2498-2
- Banat, I. M., Franzetti, A., Gandolfi, I., Bestetti, G., Martinotti, M. G., Fracchia, L., Smyth, T. J., & Marchant, R. (2010). Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 87(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2589-0
- Bodour, A. A., & Miller-Maier, R. M. (1998). Application of a modified drop-collapse technique for surfactant quantitation and screening of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 32(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00031-1
- Cameotra, S. S., & Makkar, R. S. (2004). Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 7(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.006
- Cappuccino, J. G., & Sherman, N. (2014). Microbiology: A laboratory manual (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Cheesbrough, M. (2006). District laboratory practice in tropical countries, Part 2 (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543470
- Cooper, D. G., & Goldenberg, B. G. (1987). Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53(2), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.2.224-229.1987
- da Rosa, C. F. C., Freire, D. M. G., & Ferraz, H. C. (2015). Biosurfactant microfoam: Application in the removal of pollutants from soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.11.008
- Desai, J. D., & Banat, I. M. (1997). Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 61(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.61.1.47-64.1997
- Fagan, M. (2015). Antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the elderly living in nursing homes versus the elderly living at home: An observational study. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0098-9
- Franzetti, A., Gandolfi, I., Bestetti, G., Smyth, T. J., & Banat, I. M. (2010). Production and applications of trehalose lipid biosurfactants. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 112(6), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900162
- Gautam, K. K., & Tyagi, V. K. (2006). Microbial surfactants: A review. Journal of Oleo Science, 55(4), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.55.155
- Georgiou, G., Lin, S.-C., & Sharma, M. M. (1992). Surface-active compounds from microorganisms. *Bio/Technology, 10*(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0192-60
- Gharaei-Fathabad, E. (2011). Biosurfactants in pharmaceutical industry: A mini-review. American Journal of Drug Discovery and Development, 1(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajdd.2011.58.69
- Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., & Williams, S. T. (Eds.). (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology (9th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
- Hommel, R. K., & Ratledge, C. (1993). Biosynthetic mechanisms of low molecular weight surfactants and their precursor molecules. In N. Kosaric (Ed.), Biosurfactants: Production, properties, applications (pp. 3–63). Marcel Dekker.
- Jain, D. K., Collins-Thompson, D. L., Lee, H., & Trevors, J. T. (1991). A drop-collapsing test for screening surfactant-producing microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 13(4), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(91)90064-W
- Karlapudi, A. P., Venkateswarulu, T. C., Tammineedi, J., Srirama, K., Kanumuri, L., & Kodali, V. P. (2018). A review on biosurfactant production by microbial sources. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 6(4), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2018.64004
- Kitamoto, D., Isoda, H., & Nakahara, T. (2002). Functions and potential applications of glycolipid biosurfactants. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 94(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(02)80149-9
- Lang, S. (2002). Biological amphiphiles (microbial surfactants). Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 7(1–2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00007-4
- Lang, S., & Wullbrandt, D. (1999). Rhamnose lipids Biosynthesis, microbial production and application potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051358
- Li, Y., & Yu, H. (2011). Biosurfactants from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Production and applications. In M. N. V. Prasad (Ed.), Heavy metal pollution and its eco-toxicological effects (pp. 187–209). I.K. International Publishing House.
- Makkar, R. S., Cameotra, S. S., & Banat, I. M. (2011). Advances in utilization of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production. AMB Express, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-5
- Manikandan, S., & Ganesapandian, S. (2011). Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection causing human pathogenic bacteria. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 3(2), 56–60.
- Marchant, R., & Banat, I. M. (2012). Biosurfactants: A sustainable replacement for chemical surfactants? Biotechnology Letters, 34(9), 1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-0956-x
- MarketsandMarkets. (2017). Biosurfactants market by type (glycolipids, lipopeptides, phospholipids, polymeric biosurfactants), application (detergents, personal care, agricultural chemicals, food processing), and region – Global forecast to 2022. MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd.
- Morikawa, M., Hirata, Y., & Imanaka, T. (2000). A study on the structure–function relationship of lipopeptide biosurfactants. *Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1488*(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00124-4
- Mulligan, C. N. (2005). Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environmental Pollution, 133(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.009
- Mulligan, C. N. (2009). Recent advances in the environmental applications of biosurfactants. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 14(5), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.06.005
- Nitschke, M., & Costa, S. G. V. A. O. (2007). Biosurfactants in food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(5), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.002
- Nitschke, M., & Silva, S. S. (2018). Recent food applications of microbial surfactants. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(4), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1208635
- Onwukwe, C. D., Nwachukwu, I. N., & Ogbulie, J. N. (2025). Process optimization for biosurfactant production from Alcaligenes spp. using response surface methodology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(12), 1377–1394.
- Pacwa-Płociniczak, M., Płaza, G. A., Piotrowska-Seget, Z., & Cameotra, S. S. (2011). Environmental applications of biosurfactants: Recent advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(1), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010633
- Peypoux, F., Bonmatin, J. M., & Wallach, J. (1999). Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51(5), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051432
- Plaza, G. A., Zjawiony, I., & Banat, I. M. (2006). Use of different methods for detection of thermophilic biosurfactant-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated and bioremediated soils. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 50(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.005
- Ron, E. Z., & Rosenberg, E. (2001). Natural roles of biosurfactants. Environmental Microbiology, 3(4), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00190.x
- Rosenberg, E., & Ron, E. Z. (1999). High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051502
- Sachdev, D. P., & Cameotra, S. S. (2013). Biosurfactants in agriculture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(3), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4641-8
- Santos, D. K. F., Rufino, R. D., Luna, J. M., Santos, V. A., & Sarubbo, L. A. (2016). Biosurfactants: Multifunctional biomolecules of the 21st century. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(3), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030401
- Satpute, S. K., Bhawsar, B. D., Dhakephalkar, P. K., & Chopade, B. A. (2008). Assessment of different screening methods for selecting biosurfactant-producing marine bacteria. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 37(3), 243–250.
- Sen, R. (2010). Biosurfactants. In K. N. Timmis (Ed.), Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology (pp. 2477–2488). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_184
- Soberón-Chávez, G., Lépine, F., & Déziel, E. (2005). Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 68(6), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0150-3
- Storme, O., Saucedo, J. T., Garcia-Mora, A., Dehesa-Dávila, M., & Naber, K. G. (2019). Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 11, 1756287218814382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287218814382
- Tabatabaee, A., Mazaheri Assadi, M., Noohi, A. A., & Sajadian, V. A. (2005). Isolation of biosurfactant producing bacteria from oil reservoirs. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 2(1), 6–12.
- Van Hamme, J. D., Singh, A., & Ward, O. P. (2006). Physiological aspects of biosurfactants in microbial growth and biodegradation. Biotechnology Advances, 24(6), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.08.001
- Varjani, S. J., & Upasani, V. N. (2017). Critical review on biosurfactant analysis, purification and characterization using rhamnolipid as a model biosurfactant. Bioresource Technology, 232, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.047
- Vijayakumar, S., & Saravanan, V. (2015). Biosurfactants-types, sources and applications. Research Journal of Microbiology, 10(5), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3923/jm.2015.181.192
- Weekes, L. M. (2015). Antibiotic resistance changing management of urinary tract infections in aged care. Medical Journal of Australia, 203(9), 352. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja15.00687
- Youssef, N. H., Duncan, K. E., Nagle, D. P., Savage, K. N., Knapp, R. M., & McInerney, M. J. (2004). Comparison of methods to detect biosurfactant production by diverse microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 56(3), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.001
Biosurfactants, which are surface-active molecules of microbial origin, are garnering significant attention as
sustainable substitutes for synthetic surfactants. Their appeal lies in their inherent biocompatibility, environmental
degradability, and stable performance across a range of physicochemical conditions. A primary impediment to their
industrial adoption, however, is the substantial expense associated with fermentation feedstocks. The present investigation
evaluates the efficacy of groundnut oil, a low-cost agricultural by-product, as an exclusive carbon substrate for the cost-
effective microbial synthesis of biosurfactants. A consortium of a bacterial strains, isolated from hydrocarbon-
contaminated soil, underwent primary screening for biosurfactant production. This screening employed a tripartite
methodological approach: the oil-spreading technique, the drop-collapse assay, and the determination of the emulsification
index (E24). Among the evaluated isolates, Micrococcus sp. strain LB11 demonstrated superior surface-activity traits,
manifesting a 15 mm zone of oil\displacement and a rapid reduction in interfacial tension evidenced by a 45-second drop-
collapse duration. While Alcaligenes faecalis (IS-7) displayed a considerable capacity for emulsion
stabilization, Micrococcus sp. LB11 emerged as the most proficient candidate when propagated in a medium formulated
with groundnut oil. Cultivation of Micrococcus sp. LB11 on this lipid substrate facilitated the generation of a biosurfactant
achieving an E24 value of approximately 65% over a 24-hour incubation period. This quantitative measure of emulsion
stability indicates the synthesis of a high-quality, robust biosurfactant. The magnitude of the emulsifying activity further
suggests the production of a high-molecular-weight compound, potentially possessing a glycoproteinaceous character.
These outcomes collectively validate groundnut oil as a proficient and economical substrate for augmenting biosurfactant
yield. In summary, these findings position Micrococcus sp. LB11 as a highly promising isolate warranting in-depth
biochemical analysis and scale-up exploration. The resultant biosurfactant holds considerable promise for deployment in
environmentally pertinent applications, including but not limited to soil and water bioremediation, microbial-enhanced
hydrocarbon recovery, and various green technological processes.
Keywords :
Micrococcus sp. LB11, Groundnut Oil, Glycoprotein Biosurfactant, Biosurfactant Production, Sustainable Substrate, Emulsification Index (E24), Stable Emulsion Formation, Low-Cost Fermentation, Agro-Industrial Waste Valorization, Microbial Surface-Active Agents.