Authors : Aristeidis Orfanidis

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3rnxp2u6

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3dnxmvpa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar1417

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study introduces and develops the concept of the “society of constant(continuous) opinion” as a theoretical framework for understanding a significant transformation in the contemporary public sphere. In modern democratic societies, the spread of digital communication media and the increased access to information have substantially expanded citizens’ ability to participate in public discourse. The expression of opinion has become an almost universal social practice, resulting in the growing visibility and influence of opinion within the public sphere. The study examines this phenomenon through a philosophical, sociological, and political perspective. It begins with an analysis of the classical distinction between knowledge and opinion in the history of philosophy. It then proposes a definition of the society of constant opinion and presents a theoretical model that includes epistemological, communicative, and political dimensions. The research highlights the main mechanisms that reinforce the continuous production of opinion, as well as the paradox of the hyperdemocratization of opinion, according to which the expansion of participation in public discourse may lead to a weakening of the distinction between knowledge and opinion, that is, between objectivity and subjectivity. Finally, the concept of the society of constant opinion is proposed as an interdisciplinary interpretive framework for analyzing the relationship between knowledge, public communication, and democratic participation in contemporary societies.

Keywords : Society of Constant Opinion, Public Sphere, Knowledge and Opinion, Democratic Dialogue, Sociology of Communication.

References :

1. Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books, 2006.
2. ---. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
4. ---. On Television. New York: The New Press, 1998.
5. Brennan, Jason. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
6. Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press, 1927.
7. Gettier, Edmund L. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23, no. 6 (1963): 121–23.
8. Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
9. Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
10. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
11. Lippmann, Walter. Public Opinion. New York: Free Press, 1922.
12. Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.
13. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. London: Penguin Classics, 2006.
14. Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge, 1945.
15. Plato. Apology. In Plato: Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997.
16. ---. Republic. In Plato: Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997.
17. ---. Theaetetus. In Plato: Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997.
18. Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Books, 1985.
19. Sartori, Giovanni. Homo Videns: Television and Post-Thinking. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
20. Sunstein, Cass R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.