The Role of Environmental Taxation in Promoting Sustainable Business Practices in Nigeria


Authors : Fadipe, A. O.; Malomo, E; Osanyibi, T; Akinlade, O. O.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/jjp7kf6b

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may796

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study investigates how environmental taxation influences the adopting of sustainable business practices among large and medium-sized firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. Drawing on a cross-sectional survey of 200 senior managers and sustainability officers in the manufacturing, oil & gas, and telecommunications sectors, the research examines perceptions of key tax attributes—clarity of tax bases, administrative ease, cost impacts, revenue transparency, and internal compliance capacity—and their association with five dimensions of corporate sustainability: energy efficiency, waste management, renewable‐energy adoption, environmental reporting, and strategic integration of environmental considerations. Descriptive statistics reveal strong consensus that tax bases are clearly defined (71.5%), remittance processes are straightforward (70.0%), and revenues are transparently earmarked for environmental initiatives (85.0%), while views on cost burdens are evenly split. High levels of sustainable practice adoption are observed for energy efficiency (70.5%), renewables (73.5%), reporting (80.0%), and strategic integration (82.5%), whereas comprehensive waste‐ reduction programs remain relatively uncommon (41.5%). One-sample Chi-Square tests confirm these patterns are statistically significant (all p < .001). Findings suggest that well-designed and effectively administered environmental taxes can drive substantive energy and disclosure practices, but that additional incentives and technical support are needed to bolster waste‐management efforts. The study concludes with recommendations to recalibrate levy rates, introduce waste‐ management credits, sustain administrative enhancements, and publicise revenue impacts, thereby maximising environmental taxation’s potential to foster holistic corporate sustainability in Nigeria’s green economy.

Keywords : Environmental Taxation; Sustainable Business Practices; Energy Efficiency; Waste Management; Renewable Energy Adoption; Environmental Reporting.

References :

  1. Adewale M. A., Amos D. S. & Oladimeji A. O. (2022) Tax Revenue and Sustainable Development in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Analysis, Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 43-54
  2. Aduloju, B. (2023). 10% excise duty on plastics, N8 tax per cigarette… highlights of FG’s new fiscal policy. TheCable. https://www.thecable.ng/10-excise-duty-on-plastics-cigarettes-get-n8-stick-highlights-of-fgs-new-fiscal-policy
  3. Alonso-Almeida, M. M., Marimon, F., & Rodríguez, M. (2020). Sustainable business practices among SMEs: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner      Production, 254, 120169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120169
  4. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265
  5. Bhatia, H. L. (2009). Public finance (26th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.
  6. Brown, J. (2025). Impact of environmental taxation on environmental sustainability in Nigeria. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 9(3).         https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.09.03.Art002
  7. CAC database (2024). CAC (Corporate Affairs Commission) database. https://www.cac.gov.ng/
  8. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2022). Annual economic report.
  9. Chang, O. H., & Slaubaugh, M. D. (2017). Sustainable business practices in the United States: A survey on implementation. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v7n3p1
  10. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
  11. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California     Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.
  12. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
  13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  14. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from Business Strategy and the Environment. Business Strategy and the              Environment, 25(4), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
  15. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2018). The Nordic model: An analysis of leading practices in    ESG disclosure. Nordic Journal of Business.
  16. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of corporate sustainability on    organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.                 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2012.1680
  17. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on    organizational processes and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1–                23.
  18. Efuntaade, O. O., Efuntaade, A. O., & Olugbamiye, D. O. (2023). Adoption of green, carbon and environmental taxation in Nigeria: Revenue generation and economic benefits perspectives. International Journal of Economics and Financial Management, 8(4),        54–65. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijefm.v8.no4.2023.pg54.65
  19. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st-Century                 Business. Capstone.
  20. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2021). Circular economy in action: Case studies.
  21. EU Commission. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
  22. European Environment Agency. (2020). The role of (environmental) taxation in supporting sustainability transitions. EEA. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/the-role-of-environmental-taxation
  23. European Environment Agency. (2020). The role of (environmental) taxation in supporting sustainability transitions. EEA. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/the-role-of-environmental-taxation
  24. Felipa E. M., Ancaya M. C. E., Pedro A. V., Jonathan H. O. G., Jimmy H. O. G., Elmer B. &
    Sara Y. T. (2024). Environmental Taxation and Sustainable Environmental Protection -Reality or Myth? An Integrative Review. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary                 Studies, Vol 13 No 6
  25. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
  26. Garba, I., & Gunawardana, K. (2015). Barriers and challenges of introducing environmental taxation in Nigeria for future sustainability. In Proceedings of the 12th International   Conference on Business Management (ICBM 2015).
  27. Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157–183.
  28. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1987). Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability. Prentice Hall.
  29. Grewatsch, S., & Kleindienst, I. (2017). When does it pay to be good? Moderators and mediators in the corporate sustainability–corporate financial performance            relationship: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2893-9
  30. Hussaini B., Mujeeb S. M A., Abba Y., Murtala A., Armayau S., Ghousia K., Umar A. M., & Basiru M. (2024). The Effect of Environmental Taxes on Environmental Accounting        Disclosure of Nigerian Oil and Gas Companies. International Journal of Energy          Economics and Policy, 2024, 14(2), 477-483.
  31. Iheanachor, N. (2021). Sustainable business practices by Nigerian organizations. In S. Arvidsson (Ed.), Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business: Reporting, Taxation, Ethics and Governance (pp. 1–18). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93834
  32. Iliya G. (2015). Barriers and Challenges of Introducing Environmental Taxation in Nigeria,    For Future Sustainability. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Business Management. http://ssrn.com/link/12th-ICBM-2015.html
  33. Iliya G. (2017). Sustainable development through environmental taxation in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 5 (4), April 2017
  34. Imf. (2018). Still not getting energy prices right: A global and country update of fossil-fuel subsidies (IMF Working Paper No. 18/236). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/10/05/Still-Not-Getting-Energy-Prices-Right-A-Global-and-Country-Update-of-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-46215
  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of   climate change (Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report).    Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
  36. International Monetary Fund. (2018). Still not getting energy prices right: A global and country update of fossil-fuel subsidies (IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/236). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/10/05/Still-Not-Getting-Energy-Prices-Right-A-Global-and-Country-Update-of-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-46215
  37. Jonsson, S., Ydstedt, A., & Asen, P. (2020, September 23). Looking back on 30 years of carbon taxes in Sweden. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/sweden-carbon-           tax-history/
  38. Joseph B. (2022). Impact of Environmental Taxation on Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria. Texila International Journal of Academic Research. 1-10. DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.09.03.Art002
  39. Kehinde, A. O., & Ariyoosu, D. A. (2024). Legal effects of environmental taxation in tackling greenhouse gas emissions in Nigeria: The need for a comprehensive legal framework. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, 16, 321–351. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2024.16.14
  40. Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to Wealth: The circular economy advantage. Palgrave                 Macmillan.
  41. Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
  42. Lundgren, T., Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2019). Sustainable Business Practices – An environmental economics perspective. In S. Arvidsson (Ed.), Challenges in Managing            Sustainable Business: Reporting, Taxation, Ethics and Governance (pp. 205–229). Palgrave MacMillan.
  43. Mercilina, C. E. & Gina, O. O. (2020). Influence of national tax policy on business    sustainability in nigeria. Ae-Funai Journal Of Accounting, Business And Finance        (FJABAF) vol.7, no.1
  44. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
  45. Metcalf, G. E. (2020). A proposal for a U.S. carbon tax swap: An econometric analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez020
  46. Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413
  47. Mpofu, F.Y. (2022). Green Taxes in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Protection, Sustainability, and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610239
  48. Nestlé. (2023). Nestlé Cocoa Plan.
  49. Nielsen, H., Hedegaard, M., Pedersen, A. & Gyldenkærne, S. (2023). Ex-post evaluation of     the Danish pesticide tax: A novel and effective tax design. Land Use Policy, Elsevier, 126 (C). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723000157
  50. OECD. (2021). Environmental taxation: A guide for policymakers. OECD Publishing.
  51. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Taxing energy use 2022: OECD and selected partner economies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eca2aaac-enPigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.
  52. Oyedokun, G. E., Fowokan, T. E, Hassan T. A., Akintoye, I. R. (2018). Environmental taxation and accounting in Nigeria: challenges and prospects, 5(1), 112–130.
  53. Parry, I. W. H., Black, S., & Vernon, N. (2018). Still not getting energy prices right: A global and country update of fossil-fuel subsidies. IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/236. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/10/05/Still-Not-Getting-Energy-Prices-Right-A-Global-and-Country-Update-of-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-46215
  54. Pazienza, M., de Jong, M., & Schoenmaker, D. (2023). Why corporate sustainability is not yet measured. Sustainability, 15(7), 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076275
  55. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.
  56. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
  57. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
  58. Rotimi, O. (2021). Environmental Tax and Pollution Control in Nigeria. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 280-301
  59. Salaudeen, Y. M. (2024). Taxation and Sustainable Development Goals. MPRA Paper No. 123005. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123005/
  60. Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for        sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization &             Environment, 29(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
  61. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (3rd ed.).                 Sage Publications.
  62. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
  63. Shen, S., & Wang, L. (2024). The impact of environmental protection tax on corporate performance: A new insight from multi-angle analysis. Heliyon, 10(9), e30127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30127
  64. UNEP. (2019). Fiscal policies for a low-carbon economy. United Nations Environment Programme.
  65. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (n.d.). About carbon pricing. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://unfccc.int/about-us/regional-collaboration-centres/the-ciaca/about-carbon-pricing
  66. United Nations. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/ globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf
  67. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
  68. World Bank. (2020). Nigeria’s path to sustainable growth: Energy, environment, and economy. World Bank Group.
  69. World Bank. (2023). State and trends of carbon pricing 2023. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37317
  70. Zhao, X., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2023). Impact of environmental tax on corporate sustainable            performance: Insights from high-tech firms in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010461

This study investigates how environmental taxation influences the adopting of sustainable business practices among large and medium-sized firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. Drawing on a cross-sectional survey of 200 senior managers and sustainability officers in the manufacturing, oil & gas, and telecommunications sectors, the research examines perceptions of key tax attributes—clarity of tax bases, administrative ease, cost impacts, revenue transparency, and internal compliance capacity—and their association with five dimensions of corporate sustainability: energy efficiency, waste management, renewable‐energy adoption, environmental reporting, and strategic integration of environmental considerations. Descriptive statistics reveal strong consensus that tax bases are clearly defined (71.5%), remittance processes are straightforward (70.0%), and revenues are transparently earmarked for environmental initiatives (85.0%), while views on cost burdens are evenly split. High levels of sustainable practice adoption are observed for energy efficiency (70.5%), renewables (73.5%), reporting (80.0%), and strategic integration (82.5%), whereas comprehensive waste‐ reduction programs remain relatively uncommon (41.5%). One-sample Chi-Square tests confirm these patterns are statistically significant (all p < .001). Findings suggest that well-designed and effectively administered environmental taxes can drive substantive energy and disclosure practices, but that additional incentives and technical support are needed to bolster waste‐management efforts. The study concludes with recommendations to recalibrate levy rates, introduce waste‐ management credits, sustain administrative enhancements, and publicise revenue impacts, thereby maximising environmental taxation’s potential to foster holistic corporate sustainability in Nigeria’s green economy.

Keywords : Environmental Taxation; Sustainable Business Practices; Energy Efficiency; Waste Management; Renewable Energy Adoption; Environmental Reporting.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe