Authors : Joven Rey H. Arevalo; Virginia D. Detera

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/d8xpvvu3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr606

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study aimed to investigate the motivational practices employed by junior high school science teachers in motivating learners and its effectiveness in all secondary schools, both public and private, within the Juban District, Juban, Sorsogon. Given the different motivational practices applied by junior science teachers, the study sought on how junior high school learners assess the motivational practices employed by junior science teachers and determine the challenges encountered by junior science teachers in motivating learners. The researcher also proposed and developed strategic teaching framework along with the proposed innovative teaching practices, which might be implemented and utilize by junior science teachers in Juban District and beyond, promoting for an effective, positive, and productive learning environment. The study employed descriptive research design with mixed method, both qualitative and quantitative approaches. A total of twenty-five (25) secondary school science teachers participated and sixty (60) randomly selected junior science learners within the Juban District. Data gathering involves checklist and survey-questionnaire that measured the motivational practices employed by junior science teachers, its effectiveness, and the challenges encountered by junior science teachers in motivating learners. Structured interview was also used to determine how the learners assessed the different motivational practices utilized in teaching by junior science teachers. The gathered data were analyzed and interpreted in tables with sums of ranks, ranks, weighted mean and description, and descriptive analysis. For the results of structured interview, the researcher used thematic paragraphs. The results of this study also supported by existing related studies and literature. Findings revealed that technology integration such as simulations and videos is ranked 1st motivational practice employed by junior high school science teachers in motivating learners with sums of ranks of 39. Teachers were found effectively utilized the different motivational practices they employed with average mean of 4.28. Junior high school learners assessed the effectiveness of the different motivational practices and the results found out that providing varied learning tasks leads to increase the curiosity and engagement of learners, recognized its relevance to everyday life, improved academic performance, accepted criticisms from science teachers constructively, and mastery of science concepts into practical handson skills. The results suggested that technology integration be strengthened in science classes, sustain the motivational practices employed by junior science teachers, recognize the importance of learners’ participation in assessing the effectiveness of the different motivational practices employed by junior science teachers, providing seminars, workshops, and trainings including wellness break for the teachers and students, and innovative teaching practices with strategic teaching framework be implemented and monitored.

Keywords : Motivational Practices, Strategic Teaching Framework, Innovative Teaching Practices, Technology Integration, Empowering Learners, Varied Learning Tasks, Effectiveness, Junior High School Learners, Effective, Positive, and Productive Learning Environment.

References :

1. Abejar, J.L.S. (2025). Strengthening Science Teaching Through Inquiry-Based Practices in the MATATAG CURRICULUM. depedbataan.compublications
2. Abrahams, I. and Reiss, M. J. (2017). Enhancing Learning with Effective Practical Science 11–16. Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
3. Abulibdeh, E.S. and Shana, Z. (2020). Science Practical Work and Its Impact on Students’ Science Achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888
4. Adlaon. M.S. and Laid, S.M.T. (2025). A Systematic Review of Innovative Teaching Strategies in Science: Exploring Hands-on Learning, Technology Integration, and Student-Centered Approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana. Volume 4(2), 2025, 101‒114 https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i2.645
5. Adsuara, J.P. (2022). Students’ Time Management, Academic Procrastination, and Performance during Online Science and Mathematics Classes. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.8
6. Alabi, M. (2024). The Role of Learning Styles in Effective Teaching and Learning, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385177679
7. Alanazi, H.D. (2024). Some of the Challenges That English Language Learners Face. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences www.pjlss.edu.pk https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001318
8. Ang, J.V. (2025). The Danger of Passive Learning. School of Teacher Education, Biliran Province State University, Naval, Biliran 6560, Philippines. Stratworks Research Inc. Education and Industry Review Volume 1
9. Anto, I.J.C. et. al. (2023). Challenges And Coping Strategies of Science Teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies Vol. 3(4), 2023, pp. 148-166. DOI: 10.53103/cjess.v3i4.168 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372826777
10. Arcillo, M.T. et. al. (2024). Teacher Preparedness and Resource Availability: Key Factors for Implementing the MATATAG Science Curriculum. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo. 13913450 https://risejournals.org/index.php./imjrise
11. Aydin, H. (2023). Teachers’ Perceptions and Lived Experiences of Challenges in Culturally Diverse Classrooms: Establishing an Equitable School Environment. https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2023-0028
12. Babazade, Y. and Oglu, H.A.H. (2024). Transforming Science Education: The Impact of Active Learning on Student Engagement and Achievement. Excellencia International Mult-Disciplinary Journal for Education. Volume 02, Issue 04, 2024 ISSN (E): 2994-9521 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380183988
13. Bae, C.L. and Lai, M.H.C. (2020). Opportunities to Participate in Science Learning and Student Engagement: A Mixed Methods Approach to Examining Person and Context Factors. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 112, No. 6, 1128–1153ISSN: 0022-0663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu00004101128
14. Balaoro, M.J.B. (2024). Enhancing Scientific Skills among Students Through Engaging in Active Learning Activities, United International Journal for Research & Technology, Volume 05, | Open Access | ISSN: 2582-6832
15. Bartz, K. et. al., (Improving Science Achievement—Is It Possible? Evaluating the Efficacy of a High School Chemistry and Physics Project-Based Learning Intervention. Educational Researcher, Vol. XX No. X, pp. 1 –13 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X211067742
16. Bautista, J.R. and Rogayan, D.V. (2019). Filipino Students’ Preferred Motivational Strategies in Science: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Indonesian Research Journal in Education.
17. Bektas, O., & Oguz Unver, A. (2022). Teachers' Effective Use of Time in Scientific Inquiry Lessons. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 8(4), 647-661. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2918
18. Belbekkai, D. and Omrane, D.M. (2025). Difficulties in Learning Scientific Concepts Challenges in Acquiring and Understanding Scientific Concepts International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE) DOI:10.48047/intjecse/v17i3.64 ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 17, Issue 03 2025
19. Bhattarai, R. (2025). English as a Medium of Instruction in Learning: Challenges and Prospects. KMC Journal [A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access Multidisciplinary Journal] ISSN 2961-1709 (Print) Published by the Research Management Cell Kailali Multiple Campus, Dhangadhi Far Western University, Nepal DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/kmcj.v7i1.75129
20. Bibon, M.B., (2021). Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Learners’ Academic Achievement in Science https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353768484
21. Buban. A.T. (2023). Difficulties in Learning Science: Basis for Intervention. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374949882
22. Buckley, C. and Nerantzi, C. (2020). Effective Use of Visual Representation in Research and Teaching within Higher Education. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 2020, Vol. 7, No. 3 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344559359
23. Calo, J.R.D. and De Vera, M.M.D. (2025). The Quality of Science Education: Viewpoints of Secondary School Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy ISSN 3047-7131 (online) & 3047-6410 (print)  February 2025, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 95–109
24. Calzada, M.P.T. and Remperas, R.N. (2025). Teachers’ Challenges and Best Practices on Laboratory Approaches in Science Teaching. International Journal of Science, Architecture, Technology, and Environment DOI: https://doi.org/10.63680/ijsate0525117.130
25. Capunitan, K.B., Lirado, J.D., & Gregana, C.F. (2023). Motivational Factors in Science Learning, Learner's Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes of Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research Volume 6 Issue 05 (May) 2023 ISSN: 2581-6888 DOI http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6504
26. Casal, M.O. and Villocino, R.P. (2025). Handling Diverse Learners from the Experiences of Teachers in Inclusive Education. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) E-ISSN: 2582-2160 IJFMR250453377 Volume 7, Issue 4, www.ijfmr.com
27. Charalampous, A. and Darra, M. (2024). The Effect of Teacher’s Feedback on Student Academic Achievement: A Literature Review Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 14, No. 1; 2025 ISSN 1927-5250 E-ISSN 1927-5269 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education doi:10.5539/jel.v14n1p42 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n1p42
28. Chu, S.L., Garcia, B.M., and Li, Q. (2023). Relevant Science:  An Investigation of How School Teachers Make Science Relevant in the Classroom. n Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL.
29. Cioca, L. I. et. al., (2022). Teaching Strategies and Students' Academic Performance in Agriculture Studies: The Mediating Effect of Teachers' Self-efficacy. INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering Vol. 68, No. 3/2022
30. Cloude, Elizabeth & Dever, Daryn & Wiedbusch, Megan & Azevedo, Roger. (2020). Quantifying Scientific Thinking Using Multichannel Data With Crystal Island: Implications for Individualized Game Learning Analytics. Frontiers in Education. 5. 10.3389/feduc.2020.572546.  Retrieved from
31. Collie, R.J., & Martin, A.J. (2019). Motivation and engagement in learning. In Oxford Research
32. Conel, E.B. (2021). Factors Affecting Students’ Interest in Learning Science, IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1 P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
33. Culita , G. F. and Puertos, J. D. (2025). Classroom Management Techniques, Motivation, and Students’ Academic Performance in Science. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Document ID: 2025PEMJ3917 DOI: 10.70838/pemj.400901
34. Dalumpines, R.M. (2018). Improving Academic Performance in Science of Grade 7 Learners Using Strategic Intervention Materials. An Action Research presented to the Research Department of the Division of Zamboanga Sibugay https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368335584
35. Dela Torre, A.D. and Dr. Paglinawan, J.L. (2024). Students Learning Preference and Student’s Engagement in Science of Secondary High School Students. IJARW | ISSN (O) - 2582-1008 December 2024 | Vol. 6 Issue. 6 www.ijarw.com
36. Department of Education, Philippine Context (2018)
37. Diack, M., Lawson, A., and Pablico, J. (2017). Differentiated Instruction in the High School Science Classroom: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 30-54
38. Dickerson, A. et. al., (2023). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high‑stakes final examinations in higher education. Higher Education (2024) 88:893–918 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01148-z
39. Diquito, T.J. (2024). Basic Education Curriculum under the Newly Implemented K to 10 (MATATAG) Curriculum in the Philippines: The Case of Science Education. American Journal of Education and Technology (AJET). Volume 3 Issue 3, Year 2024 ISSN: 2832-9481 (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.3396 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/aje
40. Discipulo, A.B. (2024). Science Teacher Competence and Implementation of Authentic Learning Approach in Online Learning Modality and Student Academic Performance in Science. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science (RIELS) Journal Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2024 | Page 688-697 | https://www.randwickresearch.com/index.php/rielsj  DOI: https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i2.1002
41. Eldawati, (2020). Application of Picture and Picture Type for Increasing Students' Creativity in Science Subjects. E-ISSN: 2715-7415 Tekno-Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pedagogi DOI:10.22437/teknopedagogi/v10i1.32706
42. Escuzar, R.F. (2025). Teaching Strategies in Science Education: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Global Literature. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) ISSN: 2643-9123 Vol. 9 Issue 6 June - 2025, Pages: 215-219 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393229558
43. Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., and Mäntylä, T. (2015). The Role of Visual Representations in Scientific Practices: From Conceptual Understanding and Knowledge Generation to ‘Seeing’ How Science Works. International Journal of STEM Education (2015) 2:11 DOI 10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x
44. Fishbach, A. & Woolley, K. (2022). The Structure of Intrinsic Motivation. University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 5807 S Woodlawn Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, Phone: 773 834-8673, Email: [email protected]
45. Fredricks, J.A. et. al., (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction Volume 43, June 2016, Pages 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
46. Gbollie, C. K. (2017). "Student Academic Performance: The Role of Motivation, Strategies, and Perceived Factors Hindering Liberian Junior and Senior High School Students Learning. Education Research International, 11.
47. Ghosh, T. (2017). Does the ‘Hands on Minds on’ Approach in Science Museums and Centres Enhance Scientific Engagement in Children Between 10-14 years old? IAD 653 Investigative Study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312219771
48. Gloria, R. Y. et. al., (2018). The effectiveness of formative assessment with understanding by design (UbD) stages in forming habits of mind in prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/983/1/012158
49. Goel, M. (2024). A Comparative Study on the Impact of Active and Passive Learning Approaches on Student Academic Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research www.multidisciplinaryjournals.in ISSN: 2455-4588 Received: 03-02-2024, Accepted: 26-02-2024, Published: 20-03-2024 Volume 9, Issue 1, 2024, Page No. 114-116
50. Goh, C. F., Hii, P. K., Tan, O. K., & Rasli, A. (2020). Why do university teachers use E-learning systems?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 136-155.
51. Hamlyn, R., Matthews, P., & Shanahan, M. (2017). Young people’s views on science education: science education tracker research report February 2017. London: Wellcome Trust.
52. Han, F. (2021). The Relations Between Teaching Strategies, Students’ Engagement in Learning, and Teachers’ Self‐Concept.  Sustainability 2021, 13, 5020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095020
53. Hasan, A.M.M. (2024). Teachers’ Feedback and Its Impact on Students’ Performance in Education. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) ISSN: 2643-9123 Vol. 8 Issue 3 March - 2024, Pages: 21-31 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379535152
54. Hassan, H.M.A., Awadalbari, M.M.A., and Uddin, M.K. (2023). The Role of Pair Work and Group Work in Developing Students' Academic Performance. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation ISSN: 2617-0299 (Online); ISSN: 2708-0099 (Print)DOI: 10.32996/ijllt Journal Homepage: www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt
55. Hornstra, L. et. al., (2015). Motivational teacher strategies: the role of beliefs and contextual factors. DOI 10.1007/s10984-015-9189-y
56. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/download/3720/5329/
57. Hunt, C. and Miller, J. (2015). Assessing Digital Literacy—A Framework for Developing a General Measure. Association for Talent Development. Published March 02 2015.
58. I Dewa Ayu Made Meilani Pramesti. (2024). Exploring the Benefits of Formative Assessment in the Classroom. Journal of English Study Programme
59. Jiang, P. (2023). Unleashing the Potential of ChatGPT: Empowering Enhanced Active Learning in the Classroom Compared to Conventional Passive Learning. Abstracts of the 5th World Conference on Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 32–32. https://doi.org/10.62422/978-81-968539-1-4-006
60. Kidd, C. and Wade, S. (2019). The Role of Prior Knowledge and Curiosity in Learning. The Psychonomic Society, Inc. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2019) 26:1377–1387 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01598-6
61. Kobylarek, A. (2018). Science As a Bridge. Science in Action, Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2018 doi: 10.15503/jecs20182.5.8 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327513955
62. Kolbe. T., et. al. (2020). Time to Teach: Instructional Time and Science Teachers’ Use of Inquiry-Oriented Instructional Practices. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016146812012201211
63. Kumar, D. (2024). PHET: An Interactive Simulation Technology for learning Outcomes Based Teaching-Learning Science. International Education and Research Journal, E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 10
64. Lamb, M. (2019). Motivational Teaching Strategies. University of Leeds, United Kingdom. Pre-publication version of chapter from Lamb, M., Csizér, K., Henry, A., & Ryan, S. (Eds.). (2019). The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
65. Lederman, J.S. and Lederman, N. G. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
66. Lone, R.A. (2021). Self-confidence among Students and its Impact on their Academic Performance: A Systematic Review, International Journal for Creative Research Thoughts IJCRT | Volume 9, Issue 5 May 2021 | ISSN: 2320-2882
67. Magayon, M. V. C., & Tan, E. B. (2020). The Road Less Taken: Differentiated Instruction (DI) as Practiced by Grade 7 Mathematics Teachers in the Philippines. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(1), 38-57.https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.41.3857
68. Mangarin, R.A. and Macayana, L.B. (2024). Why Schools Lack Laboratory and Equipment in Science? Through the Lense of Research Studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume VIII Issue X October 2024. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100238
69. Manjaly, J.A. and Singh, A.S. (2022). Using Curiosity to Improve Learning Outcomes in Schools. SAGE Open January-March 2022: 1–15, The Author(s) 2022 DOI: 10.1177/21582440211069392journals.sagepub.com/home/sgohttps://us.sagepub.com/enus/nam/open-access-at-sage).
70. Maspul, K.A. (2023). Enhancing Project-Based Learning in STEM Education with Integrated Technology and Coding, Journal of Intelligent Systems and Information Technology Volume 1(1), 2023 E-ISSN: 0000-0000 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377767708
71. Mauliya, I., Relianisa, R. Z., & Rokhyati, U. (2020). Lack of motivation factors creating poor academic performance in the context of graduate English department students.  Linguists Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 73-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.3604
72. Mella, M.C.G. (2022). Student Reflection on and for Learning: A Foundation for Responsive Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369012788
73. Miller, A., & Taylor, B. (2020). The impact of active learning strategies on student outcomes in science education. Journal of Science Education, 45(2), 123-135.
74. Motevalli, S., Perveen, A., & Michael, M. T. A. (2020). Motivating Students to Learn: An Overview of Literature in Educational Psychology. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 9(3), 63–74.
75. Nazareno, J. M. (2021). Developing Scientific Thinking Skills: A Literature Review. GSJ: Volume 9, Issue 7, July 2021, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 6 www.globalscientificjournal.com
76. Nwafor, C.E. (2019). Teachers Based Strategies for Motivating Students Interest in Basic Science and Technology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–1959.p- ISSN: 2320–1940 Volume 9, Issue 2 Ser. IV. (Mar. - Apr .2019), PP 53-57 www.iosrjournals.org
77. Obilor, E. I. (2019). Feedback and Students’ Learning. International Journal of Innovative Education Research 7(2):40-47, Seahi Publications, 2019 www.seahipaj.org  ISSN: 2354-2942
78. Oh, E. and Yang, S. (2024).  Strategies forEnhancing Young       Children's Scientific Inquiry Skills. Journal of Education and Educational Research ISSN: 2957-9465 | Vol. 11, No. 1, 2024
79. Oliver, M. C., Jerrim, J., & Adkins, M. J. (2021). PISA: Engagement Attainment and interest in Science (PEAS) – Final Report. Available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/lsri/documents/peas-report.pdf.
80. Ondoy, M.L. et. al., (2024). Exploring Active Learning Strategies in Science among Senior High School STEM Learners and Teachers. Science Education International 35(4),369-381 https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.8
81. Osin, and Dr. Sahoo, M. (2022). Performance-Based Assessment in Science at Elementary School Level. International Journal of Advance and Applied Research www.ijaar.co.in ISSN – 2347-7075 Impact Factor – 7.328 Peer Reviewed Bi-Monthly Vol.9 No.5
82. Özkale, U. and Kanadlı, S. (2021). An Investigation of Feedback Strategies Used by Science Teachers in the Classroom Setting: A Mixed-Methods Research. International Journal of Progressive Education, Volume 17 Number 1, 2021 INASED. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349427935
83. Prabha, S. (2020). Students’ Views on Difficulties in Conceptual Understanding of Science at Secondary Stage. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 2020 Volume 16, Pages 1-10, ISSN: 2587-1730 ICEMST 2020
84. Quak, M., London, R.E., and Talsma, D. (2015). A Multisensory Perspective of Working Memory, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:197. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00197
85. Quijanes, Paula P.; Teachers’ Motivational Practice and Student Motivation in the EFL classroom: A Literature Review; Goteborgs Universitet
86. Reyes, R. L. (2025). Integrating Real-World Problems into Chemistry Curricula: Enhancing Relevance and Student Engagement. Forum for Education Studies is published by Academic Publishing Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2177
87. Rother, Mike. (2017). The Toyota Kata Practice Guide: Developing Scientific Thinking Skills Superior
88. Ryan, M.P. (2021). Five Case Studies on Tackling Real-World Problems as a Means to Increase Student Engagement. Fostering Meaningful Learning Experiences Through Student Engagement; 2021
89. Sanchez, H.G. and Yang, Z. (2025). Teachers’ Pedagogical Intentions While Using Motivational Strategies.https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/76/4/508/6407675
90. Saro, et. al. (2023). A Comprehensive Review: Transforming Science Education in the Pearl of the  Orient- Innovations in Teaching Approaches and Technology Integration. Psych Educ,2023, 14: 1122-1131, Document ID:2023 PEMJ1321, doi:10.5281/zenodo.10068809, ISSN 2822-4353
91. Solomo, M.W.M. (2021). Competencies and Challenges of DEPED Teachers in the K to 12 Science Curriculum Implementation. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra0414
92. Stegmann, U.E. (2021). Scientific Modelling with Diagrams. Content Courtesy of Springer Nature, Synthese (2021) 198:2675–2694 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0
93. Tan, R.M., Yangco, R.T. and Que, E.N. (2020). Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in an Inquiry-Based Flipped Classroom Environment, Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 17 (1), 159-184
94. Titus, A. and Muttungal, P.V. (2024). Reflective Thinking in School: A Systematic Review, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Vol. 13, No. 2, April 2024, pp. 742~751ISSN: 2252-8822, DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26573
95. To, J. (2025). Feedback Partnerships: Strengthening Students’ Proactive Recipience Through Co-creating Dialogic Feedback, Higher Education Research & Development, 44:4, 1008-1023, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2024.2445570https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2445570
96. Toledo, P.L. (2023). Differentiated Instruction for an Enhanced Students’ Academic Performance in Science 10 (Physics). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research 2023, Vol. 4, No. 8, 2830 – 2846 http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.21
97. Van Wyk, J. & Haffejee, F. (2017). Benefits of Group Learning As a Collaborative Strategy in a Diverse Higher Education Context, International Journal of Educational Sciences, 18:1-3, 158-163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2017.1305745
98. Welsh, D., Bush, J., Thiel, C., & Bonner, J. (2019). Reconceptualizing goal setting’s dark side: The ethical consequences of learning versus outcome goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 14–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.11.001
99. Wright, J. Six Reasons why children are unmotivated, Intervention Central, March, 2012 retrieved from www.interventioncentral.org/ccse , November 9, 2017
100. Zarate, Cynthia A. (2016) Organizational Behavior and Management in Philippine Organizations, 856 Nicanor Reyes, Sr. St., Sampaloc, Manila