Authors : Ruby Niña E. Rayela; Andrelin Panya S. Fetiza; Gecelene C. Estorico

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/s32a9uhn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y8p2hueh

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr031

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Soil pH profoundly affects earthworm diversity, density, biomass, and reproduction and, in turn, soil health and ecosystem process. The current systematic review, grounded on 10 peer-reviewed articles, uncovers that earthworm populations thrive best in soils with a slightly alkaline or neutral pH level of 6.5–7.5, as it favors the highest microbial activity, decomposition of organic matter, and nutrient availability. Conversely, acidic soils (pH < 5.5) significantly decrease earthworm density and diversity because of aluminum toxicity, calcium deficiency, and inhibited enzymatic activities, affecting metabolism, burrowing, and reproduction. Extremely acidic soils (pH < 4.5) cause species richness losses of 85%, biomass reductions of 70%, and cocoon production losses of 50–70%, greatly affecting soil fertility. Although moderately alkaline soils (pH > 7.5) continue to support earthworm populations, there are slight declines as a result of reduced microbial decomposition and changed soil chemistry. Reversing soil acidification requires the use of lime, organic amendments, less acidifying fertilizers, and sustainable agriculture practices. Degraded soils can also be restored and earthworm populations and biodiversity can be supported through the use of conservation tillage and phytoremediation. This review emphasizes the close relationship of soil pH with vermicommunity structure and recommends active soil management in agriculture, forestry, and conservation for the maintenance of ecosystem resilience.

Keywords : Soil Health, Ecotoxicology, Microbial Activity, Soil Biodiversity.

References :

1. Zhang, W., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Zhao, L., & Qiao, Y. (2019). Effects of soil acid stress on the survival, growth, reproduction, antioxidant enzyme activities, and protein contents in earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 22692–22701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04643-y
2. Zhou, C., Wu, J., Luo, X., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2018). Effects of soil properties and aging process on the acute toxicity of cadmium to earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(14), 13522–13530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0739-y
3. Zhou, J., Zhang, S., He, J., Zhao, L., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Impact of soil metals on earthworm communities from the perspectives of earthworm ecotypes and metal bioaccumulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 409, 124977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124977
4. Fournier, B., Aubert, M., Paulet, Y., Hernandez, J., & Cluzeau, D. (2021). Response of earthworm communities to soil engineering and soil isolation in urban landscapes. Ecological Engineering, 170, 106354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106354
5. Maréchal, J., Hoeffner, K., Marié, X., & Cluzeau, D. (2024). Impacts of soil engineering processes and anthropogenic barriers on earthworm communities in urban areas. European Journal of Soil Biology, 120, 103598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103598​:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
6. Torppa, K. A., Castaño, C., Glimskär, A., Skånes, H., & Maaroufi, N. I. (2024). Soil moisture and fertility drive earthworm diversity in north temperate semi-natural grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 362, 108370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108370​
7. Chaudhuri, P. S., Nath, S., & Paliwal, R. (2020). Soil properties change earthworm diversity indices in different agro-ecosystems. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 20, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00296-5
8. Kumar, A., Dhingra, S., & Dhingra, D. (2021). Assessment of heavy metal contamination and its effect on earthworms in different types of soils. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18, 2167–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03297-z
9. Fournier, B., Aubert, M., Paulet, Y., Hernandez, J., & Cluzeau, D. (2021). Response of earthworm communities to soil engineering and soil isolation in urban landscapes. Ecological Engineering, 170, 106354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106354
10. Singh, S., Singh, J., & Vig, A. P. (2020). Diversity and Abundance of Earthworms in Different Landuse Patterns: Relation with Soil Properties. Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences, 9(2), 111-118. citeturn0search0