Authors : B. Siri Sumedha Thero; K.S.H.M.V.W.W. Senevirathne

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mtj8z4tk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/esn4pntv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG113

Abstract : This quantitative study investigates the influence of psychological and contextual factors on chemistry achievement among senior secondary school students in Sri Lanka. The research examines teachers' teaching styles, students' understanding of concepts, subject satisfaction, and attitudes toward chemistry as psychological factors, with gender and school type as contextual characteristics. Using a sample of 302 students and 114 teachers from 13 schools in the Kegalle Education Zone, data were collected using a Likert scale- based instrument and a structured chemistry test. The validity and reliability of the instruments were confirmed by pilot testing and confirmatory factor analysis. Data analysis, performed with SPSS and Amos software, used multivariate techniques and structural equation modeling. The results indicate that attitude towards chemistry and gender significantly influence student achievement. All variables except school location have a positive effect on student achievement. Recommendations include enhancing teacher training programs to promote effective, student-centered teaching styles, developing interventions aimed at improving students' conceptual understanding and attitudes towards chemistry, ensuring that curriculum and teaching practices are engaging and relevant to student's interests and experiences, and implementing gender-sensitive strategies to support both boys and girls in achieving their full potential in chemistry. This study provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers to design targeted strategies that address the identified factors, ultimately aiming to enhance educational outcomes and student performance in chemistry.

Keywords : Student Achievement, Chemistry Education, Psychological Factors, Contextual Characteristics, Teaching Styles, Concept Perception, Subject Satisfaction, Attitudes towards Chemistry, Gender Differences, School Types.

References :

1. Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1), 99-134. doi:10.1080/02635140308340
2. Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2019). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(1), 99-134. doi:10.1080/02635140308340
3. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331. doi:10.3102/ 01623737024004305
4. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2018). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 305-331. doi:10.3102/ 01623737024004305
5. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3-4), 255-284.
6. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2023). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(3-4), 255-284.
7. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
9. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context, and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191-1239). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_78
10. Fraser, B. J. (2020). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context, and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191-1239). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_78
11. Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119-157. doi:10.3102/00346543064001119
12. Hannaway, J., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Bringing context into effective schools research: Urban-suburban differences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 164-186. doi:10.1177/ 0013161X93029002003
13. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164. doi:10.3102/01623737019002141
14. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
15. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106
16. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2021). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106
17. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
18. Hyde, J. S. (2020). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
19. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-227. doi:10.3102/01623737019003205
20. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (2019). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 205-227. doi:10.3102/01623737019003205
21. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
22. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (2018). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
23. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467. doi:10.1080/ 09500690010006518
24. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2022). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467. doi:10.1080/ 09500690010006518
25. Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. University of Chicago Press.
26. Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes towards chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547. doi:10.1002/sce.10134
27. Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2018). Attitudes towards chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547. doi:10.1002/sce.10134
28. Samarasinghe, J. (2012). Factors affecting the performance of students in science: A study of selected schools in Colombo district. Journal of Education and Research, 1(2), 45-57.
29. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
30. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions: Prevention, diagnosis and cure. Royal Society of Chemistry.
31. Taber, K. S. (2017). Chemical misconceptions: Prevention, diagnosis, and cure. Royal Society of Chemistry.
32. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
33. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2019). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
35. Wickramasinghe, M., & Perera, H. N. (2015). An analysis of the impact of school resources on student performance: Evidence from a developing country. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.004