Authors : Maali Chrispo

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5de2rujd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/jtk76ezs

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1717

Abstract : This study investigates the impact of modern technology on photographic memory among university students at African Rural University, focusing on how digital tools influence memory retention and recall. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative memory assessments with qualitative interviews and surveys to explore students’ experiences and perceptions. Findings indicate a complex relationship where extensive technology use—particularly smartphones correlate with diminished self-reported memory confidence and recall capabilities. Despite acknowledging that technology may hinder their innate memory abilities, students often rely on these tools for academic success. Visual and auditory memory tests revealed that many participants struggled with detailed recall, reinforcing concerns about cognitive overload. The study concludes that while technology offers organizational benefits, it may simultaneously impair natural memory functions, highlighting the need for balanced technology integration in educational practices. Recommendations include training on memory strategies, practice sessions, and promoting active recall techniques to enhance memory retention amidst technological reliance. Future research should explore the long-term effects of technology use on memory development.

Keywords : Photographic Memory, Modern Technology, Memory Retention, Cognitive Load.

References :

1. Alhassan, A., Kallon, J., & Tembong, F. (2023). Technology and Memory: Investigating the Impact of Digital Tools on Retention in University Students. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4), 1-15.
2. Allen, D., Smith, R., & Taylor, J. (2022). Exploring the Limits of Eidetic Memory in the Digital Age. Cognitive Psychology Review, 29(3), 217-234.
3. Bailey, J., & Phillips, L. (2021). The Decline of Eidetic Memory: Age-Related Changes in Visual Recall. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 345-356.
4. Bailey, R., & Phillips, T. (2021). The evolution of memory: Exploring eidetic memory in children. Journal of Child Psychology, 45(2), 112-126.
5. Bui, S., Ko, K., & Park, T. (2023). Digital Note-Taking and Its Effects on Memory Retention in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 187, 104299.
6. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 24-29.
7. Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). The relationship between social media use and memory: A study of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 313-320.
8. Farah, M., Paul, L., & Zito, R. (2021). Visual Memory and the Brain: Insights from Neuroimaging Studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 765.
9. Gallo, D., & Nussbaum, M. (2023). Memory Retention in the Age of Technology: A Review of Current Literature. Memory Studies, 16(1), 10-30.
10. Gupta, A., & Nair, S. (2022). Cognitive Strategies and Their Role in Memory Enhancement. International Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 182-195.
11. Gupta, A., & Nair, S. (2022). Technology and memory: An emerging paradox. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 678-692.
12. Hammond, S., & Johnston, K. (2014). Technology's influence on the development of memory: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 1214-1222.
13. Hernandez, D., & Baird, A. (2020). The impact of digital tools on learning: A comprehensive review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 345-368.
14. Khan, A., Malhotra, P., & Rajput, M. (2023). Cognitive Abilities and Technology Use Among University Students: A Case Study. Journal of Higher Education, 98(1), 95-110.
15. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6019), 772-775.
16. Larson, T., & Merritt, K. (2021). The Myth of Photographic Memory: Visual Recall Abilities Explained. Cognitive Science, 45(5), 1100-1121.
17. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, L. (2021). Digital Learning Tools: Enhancing Memory and Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106711.
18. Meade, M., & Hutton, P. (2022). Digital Tools and Memory: Friend or Foe? Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 300-310.
19. Meade, M., & Hutton, S. (2022). Technology and memory: The role of cognitive load. Memory, 30(5), 679-694.
20. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning: A Cognitive Approach. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 150-161.
21. Nguyen, T., Rapp, C., & Boulton, J. (2022). Mobile Technology and Memory in Higher Education: A Review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 150-166.
22. Paivio, A. (2006). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 171-182.
23. Park, S., & Lee, H. (2021). The Impact of Technology on Memory: A Psychological Perspective. Cognitive Research, 6(1), 12.
24. Park, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). The consequences of technology dependence on memory performance: A review. Cognitive Science, 45(8), 1234-1256.
25. Rogers, T., & Monsell, S. (2021). Technology and cognitive processes: Implications for memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(7), 1234-1250.
26. Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). An empirical examination of the impact of digital technology on memory and attention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1000-1006.
27. Smith, A., & McCarthy, K. (2023). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory: New Perspectives. Trends in Neuroscience, 46(4), 290-302.
28. Smith, J., & McCarthy, C. (2023). The neuroscience of photographic memory: New insights. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 1-15.
29. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778.
30. Sweeney, R., Hill, K., & Marks, S. (2022). The Cognitive Effects of Digital Devices on Learning: A Systematic Review. Learning and Instruction, 78, 101593.
31. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
32. Thomas, M., & Nippold, M. (2023). Exploring the neural underpinnings of photographic memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 200-215.
33. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (2022). Technology and Memory: Implications for Higher Education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 101-115.
34. Vujakovic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). Cognitive load theory in educational settings: Implications for teaching and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 631-646.
35. Wang, H., & Li, Y. (2022). Technology Usage and Memory Performance Among University Students. Computers & Education, 191, 104613.
36. Whitaker, J., Johnson, L., & Davis, M. (2023). Memory Decline with Age: The Role of Technology in Learning. Ageing & Mental Health, 27(3), 420-428.
37. Zhang, X., & Li, J. (2020). The Allure of Photographic Memory: Implications for Education. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1-24.
38. Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., & Chen, Q. (2022). Technology in Education: Enhancing Learning and Memory Retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1128-1145.