Authors :
Ahmed Ali Bin Ghafan Almheiri
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3pwhnase
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct065
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The importance of workplace happiness is strategic as employee well-being could influence performance, commitment and organisational stability. Yet, there is a lack of evidence to shed light on employees’ experiences of happiness programs led by their leaders in the Gulf healthcare-related organisations. The relationships between leadership strategies, workplace happiness, organisational performance, and employee loyalty in one healthcare-related organisation in Dubai were explored in this study. A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was used to collect data from 10 purposively sampled employees through semi-structured interviews, and from 149 valid responses from a survey. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data, and SPSS and partial least squares structural equation modelling were used to analyse the survey data. Five themes were found that highlighted leadership support, multidimensional well-being, performance, loyalty and implementation quality as interrelated dimensions of workplace happiness. Leadership strategies were positively associated with workplace happiness, which was positively correlated with organisational performance and employee loyalty. However, the loyalty relationship needs to be treated with caution due to construct reliability and discriminant validity issues. The integrated findings suggest that material security and recognition, flexibility and organisational care are all aspects of effective leadership support. Communication, fairness, accessibility and departmental relevance also condition programme outcomes. The findings offer context-specific, noncausal evidence to help design credible workplace-happiness strategies.
Keywords :
Leadership Strategies; Workplace Happiness; Organisational Performance; Employee Loyalty; Healthcare-Related Organisation; Dubai; Mixed Methods.
References :
- H. Chi, T.-V. Vu, H. V. Nguyen, and T. H. Truong, “How financial and non-financial rewards moderate the relationships between transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and job performance,” Cogent Business and Management, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 2173850, 2023.
- I. A. Abdalla and M. A. Al-Homoud, “Exploring the implicit leadership theory in the Arabian Gulf states,” Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 506–531, 2001.
- C. Krekel, G. Ward, and J. E. De Neve, “Employee well-being, productivity, and firm performance: Evidence and case studies,” in Global Happiness and Well-being Policy Report, J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J. D. Sachs, Eds. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019, pp. 74–95.
- A. Pandey, M. Maheshwari, and N. Malik, “A systematic literature review on employee well-being: Mapping multi-level antecedents, moderators, mediators and future research agenda,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 258, Art. no. 105080, 2025.
- B. Kuvaas, R. Buch, A. Weibel, A. Dysvik, and C. G. L. Nerstad, “Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes?” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 244–258, 2023.
- E. Kompany, D. Yilmaz, and B. Akkanat, “The effects of effort-reward imbalance on turnover intentions: Moderating roles of leadership style and organisational culture,” Journal of Organisational Behavior, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 233–249, 2024.
- M. E. P. Seligman, Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press, 2011.
- L. Van Zyl, S. Taljaard, and F. Cronje, “Extending the PERMA model: A framework for work and organisational well-being,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 229–241, 2022.
- B. Sypniewska, M. Baran, and M. Klos, “Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management—based on the study of Polish employees,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1069–1100, 2023.
- A. Salas-Vallina, Y. Rofcanin, and M. Las Heras, “Building resilience and performance in turbulent times: The influence of shared leadership and passion at work across levels,” European Management Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 8–27, 2022.
- L. Shulga, J. Busser, and D. Yedlin, “The role of service climate in enhancing workplace happiness: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Organisational Behavior, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 34–52, 2023.
- P. M. Blau, Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
- R. Cropanzano and M. S. Mitchell, “Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review,” Journal of Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 874–900, 2005.
- E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000.
- J. R. Edwards and N. P. Rothbard, “Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 178–199, 2000.
- J. G. Grzywacz and N. F. Marks, “Family, work, and health: Models of work and family spillover,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 285–295, 2000.
- D. L. Morgan, Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
- J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2023.
- V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.
- V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage, 2021.
- J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2022.
- M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling,” in Handbook of Market Research, C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, and A. Vomberg, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 1–47.
- C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS, 2024.
The importance of workplace happiness is strategic as employee well-being could influence performance, commitment and organisational stability. Yet, there is a lack of evidence to shed light on employees’ experiences of happiness programs led by their leaders in the Gulf healthcare-related organisations. The relationships between leadership strategies, workplace happiness, organisational performance, and employee loyalty in one healthcare-related organisation in Dubai were explored in this study. A sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was used to collect data from 10 purposively sampled employees through semi-structured interviews, and from 149 valid responses from a survey. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data, and SPSS and partial least squares structural equation modelling were used to analyse the survey data. Five themes were found that highlighted leadership support, multidimensional well-being, performance, loyalty and implementation quality as interrelated dimensions of workplace happiness. Leadership strategies were positively associated with workplace happiness, which was positively correlated with organisational performance and employee loyalty. However, the loyalty relationship needs to be treated with caution due to construct reliability and discriminant validity issues. The integrated findings suggest that material security and recognition, flexibility and organisational care are all aspects of effective leadership support. Communication, fairness, accessibility and departmental relevance also condition programme outcomes. The findings offer context-specific, noncausal evidence to help design credible workplace-happiness strategies.
Keywords :
Leadership Strategies; Workplace Happiness; Organisational Performance; Employee Loyalty; Healthcare-Related Organisation; Dubai; Mixed Methods.