Authors :
Ijeoma Charles; Akuma Oji; Obumneme Okwonna; Peter Muwarure
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4snfk9sr
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4r3sz2wd
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1328
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The worldwide transition to a low-carbon energy framework has established hydrogen as an essential
decarbonisation mechanism, especially for challenging industrial sectors to decarbonise. The environmental advantages of
hydrogen depend on its manufacturing method. Conventional "grey" hydrogen generation, mostly reliant on fossil-based
technologies, is a major contributor to CO2 emissions. This analysis examines the relationship between the hydrogen
economy and carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) technologies, facilitating the generation of "blue" hydrogen
as a lower-carbon transitional fuel. The research methodically examines contemporary hydrogen generation methods,
emphasising the integration of carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) with steam methane reforming (SMR) and
autothermal reforming (ATR). It offers a comprehensive analysis of post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxyfuel
carbon capture systems, assessing their maturity, efficiency, and retrofit capability. The research delineates critical
obstacles confronting both "green" (electrolysis-based) and "blue" hydrogen, including elevated prices, technical
underdevelopment, energy inefficiencies, and public acceptability concerns. The review asserts that although green
hydrogen embodies the ultimate sustainable objective, blue hydrogen, supported by CCUS, serves a crucial transitional
function in decarbonising the current hydrogen supply and industrial framework, bridging the divide until renewable
hydrogen achieves economic and technological feasibility at scale.
Keywords :
Decarbonization; Sustainability; Hydrogen Economy; Carbon Capture; Energy Transition.
References :
- R. Angelico, F. Giametta, B. Bianchi, and P. Catalano, “Green hydrogen for energy transition: A critical perspective,” *Energies*, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 404, 2025.
- S. Bouckaert et al., “Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector,” International Energy Agency, 2021.
- J. Dufour, D. Serrano, J. Galvez, J. Moreno, and C. Garcia, “Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1370–1376, 2008.
- IEAGHG, “Techno-Economic Evaluation of SMR Based Standalone (Merchant) Hydrogen Plant with CCS,” IEAGHG, Technical Report 2017-02, 2017.
- IEA, “Global Hydrogen Review 2021,” International Energy Agency, 2021.
- M. Luneau et al., “Experiments and modeling of methane autothermal reforming over structured Ni-Rh based Si-SiC foam catalysts,” *Luneau Lab*, 2017.
- IRENA, “Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5°C Climate Goal,” International Renewable Energy Agency, 2021.
- G. Zang, E. J. Graham, and D. Mallapragada, “H2 production through natural gas reforming and carbon capture: A techno-economic and life cycle analysis comparison,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 49, pp. 1288–1303, 2024.
- R. Mullen, A. Haworth, and C. Sansom, “Techno-economic analysis of steam methane reforming with full carbon capture for near-zero-carbon hydrogen,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1872–1889, 2023.
- M. E. Boot-Handford et al., “Carbon capture and storage update,” *Energy Environ. Sci.*, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 130–189, 2013.
- T. Lockwood, “A compararitive review of next-generation carbon capture technologies for coal-fired power plant,” *Energy Procedia*, vol. 114, pp. 2658–2670, 2017.
- A. Lea‐Langton and G. Andrews, “Pre‐combustion Technologies,” in *Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Unlocking Negative Emissions*, 2018, pp. 67-91.
- A. I. Osman, M. Hefny, M. I. a. A. Maksoud, A. M. Elgarahy, and D. W. Rooney, “Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review,” *Environ. Chem. Lett.*, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 797–849, 2020.
- W. L. Becker, M. Penev, and R. J. Braun, “Production of synthetic natural gas from carbon dioxide and renewably generated hydrogen: A techno-economic analysis of a power-to-gas strategy,” *J. Energy Resour. Technol.*, vol. 141, no. 2, p. 021901, 2019.
- C. Dai, L. Wu, G. Yu, and Z. Lei, “Syngas dehydration with ionic liquids,” *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.*, vol. 56, no. 49, pp. 14642-14650, 2017.
- M. A. Nemitallah et al., “Oxy‐fuel combustion technology: current status, applications, and trends,” *Int. J. Energy Res.*, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1670-1708, 2017.
- M. A. Habib et al., “A review of recent developments in carbon capture utilizing oxy-fuel combustion in conventional and ion transport membrane systems,” *Int. J. Energy Res.*, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 741–764, 2010.
- N. Florin and P. Fennell, “Carbon capture technology: future fossil fuel use and mitigating climate change,” *Grantham Inst. Climate Change Briefing Paper*, 2010.
- D. Chisalita, L. Petrescu, P. Cobden, H. Van Dijk, A. Cormos, and C. Cormos, “Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post-combustion CO2 capture and storage using the LCA methodology,” *J. Clean. Prod.*, vol. 211, pp. 1015–1025, 2018.
- National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), “Carbon Capture and Storage database,” 2022.
- J. Gaede and J. Meadowcroft, “Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions: Explaining Limited progress,” in *Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks*, 2016, pp. 319–340.
- A. Heyes and B. Urban, “The economic evaluation of the benefits and costs of carbon capture and storage,” *Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag.*, vol. 22, no. 3/4, p. 324, 2019.
- A. M. Arranz, “Hype among low-carbon technologies: Carbon capture and storage in comparison,” *Glob. Environ. Change*, vol. 41, pp. 124–141, 2016.
- B. P. Zapantis, “Global Status of CCS Report: 2020,” Global CCS Institute, 2021.
- N. Bahman, M. Al-Khalifa, S. Al Baharna, Z. Abdulmohsen, and E. Khan, “Review of carbon capture and storage technologies in selected industries: potentials and challenges,” *Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technology*, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 451-470, 2023.
- Global CCS Institute, “Global Status of CCS 2022,” Melbourne, Australia, 2022.
- I. Dincer, “Green methods for hydrogen production,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1954–1971, 2011.
- P. Fragiacomo and M. Genovese, “Modeling and energy demand analysis of a scalable green hydrogen production system,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 44, no. 57, pp. 30237–30255, 2019.
- J. Lof, C. MacKinnon, G. Martin, and D. B. Layzell, “Survey of heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles and their fit for service in Canada,” *Transition Accelerator Reports*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-74, 2020.
- M. Yu, K. Wang, and H. Vredenburg, “Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 46, no. 41, pp. 21261–21273, 2021.
- T. Da Silva Veras, T. S. Mozer, D. Da Costa Rubim Messeder Dos Santos, and A. Da Silva César, “Hydrogen: Trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2018–2033, 2016.
- B. Liu, S. Liu, S. Guo, and S. Zhang, “Economic study of a large-scale renewable hydrogen application utilizing surplus renewable energy and natural gas pipeline transportation in China,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1385–1398, 2019.
- R. S. El-Emam and H. Özcan, “Comprehensive review on the techno-economics of sustainable large-scale clean hydrogen production,” *J. Clean. Prod.*, vol. 220, pp. 593–609, 2019.
- T. Ayodele and J. Munda, “Potential and economic viability of green hydrogen production by water electrolysis using wind energy resources in South Africa,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 44, no. 33, pp. 17669–17687, 2019.
- O. Nematollahi, P. Alamdari, M. Jahangiri, A. Sedaghat, and A. A. Alemrajabi, “A techno-economical assessment of solar/wind resources and hydrogen production: A case study with GIS maps,” *Energy*, vol. 175, pp. 914–930, 2019.
- C. Walker, L. Stephenson, and J. Baxter, ““His main platform is ‘stop the turbines’ ”: Political discourse, partisanship and local responses to wind energy in Canada,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 123, pp. 670–681, 2018.
- E. Haghi, K. Raahemifar, and M. Fowler, “Investigating the effect of renewable energy incentives and hydrogen storage on advantages of stakeholders in a microgrid,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 113, pp. 206–222, 2017.
- N. Bigdeli, K. Afshar, A. S. Gazafroudi, and M. Y. Ramandi, “A comparative study of optimal hybrid methods for wind power prediction in wind farm of Alberta, Canada,” *Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.*, vol. 27, pp. 20–29, 2013.
- N. Bahman, M. Al-Khalifa, S. Al Baharna, Z. Abdulmohsen, and E. Khan, “Review of carbon capture and storage technologies in selected industries: potentials and challenges,” *Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technology*, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 451-470, 2023.
- D. Leitch, “Hydrogen: the great energy hope, or a whole lot of hype?,” *Renew. Economy*, 2020.
- K. Biniek, K. Henderson, M. Rogers, and G. Santoni, “Driving CO2 emissions to zero (and beyond) with carbon capture, use, and storage,” *McKinsey Quarterly*, 2020.
- A. J. Chapman, T. Fraser, and K. Itaoka, “Hydrogen import pathway comparison framework incorporating cost and social preference: Case studies from Australia to Japan,” *Int. J. Energy Res.*, vol. 41, no. 14, pp. 2374–2391, 2017.
- Z. Wang, L. Li, and G. Zhang, “Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of hydrogen production via chemical looping combustion thermally coupled steam reforming,” *J. Clean. Prod.*, vol. 179, pp. 335–346, 2018.
- L. K. Van Cappellen, H. Crouzen, F. Rooijers, and A. F. Kirkels, “Feasibility study into blue hydrogen: Technical, economic & sustainability analysis,” 2018.
- R. Moliner, M. Lázaro, and I. Suelves, “Analysis of the strategies for bridging the gap towards the Hydrogen Economy,” *Int. J. Hydrogen Energy*, vol. 41, no. 43, pp. 19500–19508, 2016.
- K. Zhang, H. C. Lau, and Z. Chen, “Using blue hydrogen to decarbonize heavy oil and oil sands operations in Canada,” *ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.*, vol. 10, no. 30, pp. 10003-10013, 2022.
The worldwide transition to a low-carbon energy framework has established hydrogen as an essential
decarbonisation mechanism, especially for challenging industrial sectors to decarbonise. The environmental advantages of
hydrogen depend on its manufacturing method. Conventional "grey" hydrogen generation, mostly reliant on fossil-based
technologies, is a major contributor to CO2 emissions. This analysis examines the relationship between the hydrogen
economy and carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) technologies, facilitating the generation of "blue" hydrogen
as a lower-carbon transitional fuel. The research methodically examines contemporary hydrogen generation methods,
emphasising the integration of carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) with steam methane reforming (SMR) and
autothermal reforming (ATR). It offers a comprehensive analysis of post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxyfuel
carbon capture systems, assessing their maturity, efficiency, and retrofit capability. The research delineates critical
obstacles confronting both "green" (electrolysis-based) and "blue" hydrogen, including elevated prices, technical
underdevelopment, energy inefficiencies, and public acceptability concerns. The review asserts that although green
hydrogen embodies the ultimate sustainable objective, blue hydrogen, supported by CCUS, serves a crucial transitional
function in decarbonising the current hydrogen supply and industrial framework, bridging the divide until renewable
hydrogen achieves economic and technological feasibility at scale.
Keywords :
Decarbonization; Sustainability; Hydrogen Economy; Carbon Capture; Energy Transition.