Authors :
Mohamed Ali Adam Ishaiger
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/74turcm8
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4r5btxzc
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb167
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This article conceptualizes the contemporary rise of artificial intelligence (AI) as a long-term socio-technical transformation embedded within recurring historical cycles of authority and legitimacy. Drawing on social studies of technology, political economy, and comparative social theory, specifically classical Islamic historiography, it argues that AI has emerged as a new social institution exercising interpretive authority. By 2026, empirical evidence from global AI investment flows and "Sovereign AI" initiatives in the Global South demonstrates that governance is moving away from claims of universal technological convergence toward a pluralistic global order. The article reframes this fragmentation as a historically consistent response to over-centralization. Understanding AI through this cyclical lens offers a more realistic foundation for sustainable governance in a post-universal digital landscape.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Governance, Ibn Khaldūn, Epistemic Authority, Sovereign AI, Digital Reformation, 2026 Technological Trends.
References :
- Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Duke University Press.
- Atlantic Council. (2025). Central bank digital currency tracker: The transition to computational trust.
- Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press.
- Birhane, A., et al. (2022). The values encoded in machine learning research. Proceedings of FAccT '22.
- Ibn Khaldūn. (2005). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
- OECD. (2025). The state of national AI strategies: 2025 update.
- Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
- Stanford University. (2026). The 2026 AI Index Report. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI.
- UNCTAD. (2025). Digital economy report 2025: Sovereignty and the Global South.
- World Economic Forum (WEF). (2026). Global AI investment outlook 2026.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
This article conceptualizes the contemporary rise of artificial intelligence (AI) as a long-term socio-technical transformation embedded within recurring historical cycles of authority and legitimacy. Drawing on social studies of technology, political economy, and comparative social theory, specifically classical Islamic historiography, it argues that AI has emerged as a new social institution exercising interpretive authority. By 2026, empirical evidence from global AI investment flows and "Sovereign AI" initiatives in the Global South demonstrates that governance is moving away from claims of universal technological convergence toward a pluralistic global order. The article reframes this fragmentation as a historically consistent response to over-centralization. Understanding AI through this cyclical lens offers a more realistic foundation for sustainable governance in a post-universal digital landscape.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Governance, Ibn Khaldūn, Epistemic Authority, Sovereign AI, Digital Reformation, 2026 Technological Trends.