The Effectiveness of the Short-Term Youth Empowerment Program: A Critique of the Duration and Impact of PMMD


Authors : Muhammad Aga Sekamdo; Muhadjir Darwin; Mulyadi; M. Najib Azca

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2u5uwk23

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2sryrwud

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1933

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : This paper examines the effectiveness of the Independent Youth Building Village (PMMD) Program initiated by the Ministry of Youth and Sports of the Republic of Indonesia, with a particular focus on the challenges arising from the short duration of its implementation. Although the PMMD aims to empower rural youth to actively participate in village development through leadership and entrepreneurship training, the limited duration of the program often becomes an obstacle to achieving sustainable impacts. Using a qualitative method, including in-depth interviews and online written questionnaires with PMMD participants in the DIY Province (2017–2018), this study analyzes the short-term benefits and critiques the ability of short-term interventions to foster sustainable youth leadership. The findings indicate that, while there was an increase in skills and self-confidence in the short term, the limited duration of the program hindered the sustainability of these outcomes. Recommendations include extending the program duration and providing ongoing support after the program officially concludes.

Keywords : Youth Empowerment; PMMD; Rural Development; Program Duration; Leadership; Rural Youth.

References :

  1. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
  2. Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the third world. Princeton University Press.
  3. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.
  4. Suharto, E. (2010). Pembangunan sosial dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
  5. Stake, R. E. (2005). Case study research: A critical approach. Sage Publications.
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2019). Various datasets and reports on Indonesia’s population projections and demographic trends. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id
  7. Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Korotov, K. (2010). Transformational leadership development programs: Creating long-term sustainable change. Social Science Research Network.
  8. Edelman, A., Gill, P., Comerford, K., Larson, M., & Hare, R. (2004). Youth Development & Youth Leadership. National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth.
  9. Law No. 40 of 2009 on Youth. Republic of Indonesia.
  10. Zeldin, S., Christens, B. D., & Powers, J. L. (2013). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3-4), 385–397.

This paper examines the effectiveness of the Independent Youth Building Village (PMMD) Program initiated by the Ministry of Youth and Sports of the Republic of Indonesia, with a particular focus on the challenges arising from the short duration of its implementation. Although the PMMD aims to empower rural youth to actively participate in village development through leadership and entrepreneurship training, the limited duration of the program often becomes an obstacle to achieving sustainable impacts. Using a qualitative method, including in-depth interviews and online written questionnaires with PMMD participants in the DIY Province (2017–2018), this study analyzes the short-term benefits and critiques the ability of short-term interventions to foster sustainable youth leadership. The findings indicate that, while there was an increase in skills and self-confidence in the short term, the limited duration of the program hindered the sustainability of these outcomes. Recommendations include extending the program duration and providing ongoing support after the program officially concludes.

Keywords : Youth Empowerment; PMMD; Rural Development; Program Duration; Leadership; Rural Youth.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe