Authors :
Pooja Hukkeri ; Dr.Sanjivkumar Pol
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5e6vnaxe
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may671
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The recruitment and selection landscape has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of digital
technologies. This study critically reviews and compares traditional recruitment techniques—characterized by manual
processes and subjective assessments with modern, technology-driven methods that leverage artificial intelligence (AI),
applicant tracking systems (ATS), and predictive analytics. Through a systematic literature review guided by the CIMO
(Context–Intervention Mechanism Outcome) framework and the PRISMA methodology, the research synthesizes findings
from 70 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024. The analysis focuses on six core performance variables:
cost-efficiency, time-to-hire, candidate experience, quality of hire, employer branding, and data-driven decision-making.
The findings reveal that digital recruitment tools significantly enhance efficiency, scalability and hiring accuracy, while
also improving candidate engagement and brand perception. However, they also present ethical and transparency
challenges. Traditional methods, despite their limitations, continue to offer value in contexts requiring nuanced human
judgment. The study concludes by advocating for a hybrid recruitment model that combines the speed and scalability of
digital tools with the relational strengths of traditional approaches. This paper contributes to the evolving discourse on
talent acquisition by offering a holistic, theoretically grounded and practically relevant comparison of recruitment
paradigms in the digital era.
Keywords :
Digital Recruitment, Artificial Intelligence in Hiring, Traditional Recruitment Methods, Talent Acquisition Strategies and Candidate Experience.
References :
- Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M., & Stuart, M. (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12090
- Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 13620430410550754
- Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Bassi, L. (2011). Raging debates in HR analytics. People & Strategy, 34(2), 14–18.
- Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). ‘It’s reducing a human being to a percentage’: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951
- Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2020). AI-enabled recruitment: A new era for HRM. Journal of Business Research, 121, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.jbusres.2020.08.038
- Breaugh, J. A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.003
- Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2001). Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers’ employer knowledge during recruitment. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01 )20002-4
- Cappelli, P. (2001). Making the most of on-line recruiting. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 139–146.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.6
- Collins, C. J., & Stevens, C. K. (2002). The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants. Personnel Psychology, 55(3), 685–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00123.x
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
- Dineen, B. R., & Allen, D. G. (2016). Third party employment branding: Human capital inflows and outflows following “best places to work” certifications. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0937
- Holm, A. B. (2012). E-recruitment: Towards a Ubiquitous Recruitment Process and Candidate Relationship Management. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 26(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/1 0.1177/239700221202600303
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.103 8/s42256-019-0088-2
- Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
- Kashi, K., & Zheng, C. (2013). Extending technology acceptance model to social media adoption. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.51 21/ijmit.2013.5101
- Koch, T., Gerber, C., & De Klerk, J. J. (2018). The impact of social media on recruitment: Are you LinkedIn? SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4 102/sajhrm.v16i0.861
- Kumari, N. (2012). A study of the recruitment and selection process: SMC Global. Industrial Engineering Letters, 2(1), 34–43.
- Lee, I. (2005). The evolution of e-recruiting: A content analysis of Fortune 100 career web sites. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 3(3), 57–68.
- Levenson, A. (2018). Strategic analytics: Advancing strategy execution and organizational effectiveness. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- LinkedIn. (2023). Global Talent Trends Report 2023. https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/resources/talent-strategy/global-talent-trends-2023
- Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699
- Newell, S. (2005). Recruitment and selection. In B. Towers (Ed.), The Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 115–141). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Nikolaou, I. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 179–189.
- Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.114 5/3351095.3372828
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- Singh, P., & Finn, D. (2003). The effects of information technology on recruitment. Journal of Labor Research, 24(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12122-003-1003-1
- Sivertzen, A. M., Nilsen, E. R., & Olafsen, A. H. (2013). Employer branding: Employer attractiveness and the use of social media. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(7), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2013-0393
- Suen, H. Y., Chen, M. Y. C., & Lu, S. H. (2019). Does the use of synchrony and asynchrony in AI-based interviews affect applicant performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.chb.2019.04.001
- Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: A Future Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9(6), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v9i6.6461
- Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., Roth, P. L., & Payne, S. C. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021196
- Zliobaite, I. (2017). Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31(4), 1060–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-017-0517-6
The recruitment and selection landscape has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of digital
technologies. This study critically reviews and compares traditional recruitment techniques—characterized by manual
processes and subjective assessments with modern, technology-driven methods that leverage artificial intelligence (AI),
applicant tracking systems (ATS), and predictive analytics. Through a systematic literature review guided by the CIMO
(Context–Intervention Mechanism Outcome) framework and the PRISMA methodology, the research synthesizes findings
from 70 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024. The analysis focuses on six core performance variables:
cost-efficiency, time-to-hire, candidate experience, quality of hire, employer branding, and data-driven decision-making.
The findings reveal that digital recruitment tools significantly enhance efficiency, scalability and hiring accuracy, while
also improving candidate engagement and brand perception. However, they also present ethical and transparency
challenges. Traditional methods, despite their limitations, continue to offer value in contexts requiring nuanced human
judgment. The study concludes by advocating for a hybrid recruitment model that combines the speed and scalability of
digital tools with the relational strengths of traditional approaches. This paper contributes to the evolving discourse on
talent acquisition by offering a holistic, theoretically grounded and practically relevant comparison of recruitment
paradigms in the digital era.
Keywords :
Digital Recruitment, Artificial Intelligence in Hiring, Traditional Recruitment Methods, Talent Acquisition Strategies and Candidate Experience.