Authors : Pragnya Suvarchala Nidugonda; Shabana Azmi Shaik

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5ehdbayn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/494wc9dd

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr987

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study explores the influence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, on the cognitive development and mental processing of youth. The rapid integration of generative AI tools in educational settings raises concerns about their impact on learning, decision-making, and social interactions. Through a review of existing literature from 2017 to 2023, this research examines both the benefits and challenges associated with ChatGPT’s use among young individuals. While studies highlight its potential in enhancing academic performance, facilitating knowledge acquisition, and supporting problem- solving, concerns are raised about cognitive drawbacks such as overreliance, diminished critical thinking, and reduced originality. Ethical issues, such as the potential for diminished skepticism and over trust in AI-generated information, are also discussed. The study emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in integrating AI into educational frameworks, ensuring it supports cognitive growth without hindering independent thought. The research concludes with recommendations for future studies that involve direct engagement with youth to better understand the long-term effects of AI on cognitive processes and inform educational strategies.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Chat GPT, Youth, Cognitive Processes, Development, Decision-making, Social Interactions.

References :

1. Abdullah, M., Madain, A., & Jararweh, Y. (2022). ChatGPT: Fundamentals, applications, and social impacts. In 2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1109/snams58071.2022.10062688
2. Alshater, M. M. (2022). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A case study of ChatGPT. SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358
3. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
4. Chan, A. (2022). GPT-3 and InstructGPT: Technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry. AI Ethics, 3, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6
5. Chan, C. K., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.00290
6. Cheng, K., He, Y., Li, C., Xie, R., Lu, Y., Gu, S., et al. (2023). Talk with ChatGPT about the outbreak of Mpox in 2022: Reflections and suggestions from AI dimensions. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 51, 870–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03196-z
7. Collins, A. (2017). What's worth teaching?: Rethinking curriculum in the age of technology. Teachers College Press.
8. Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Front. Comput. Intell. Syst., 2, 4465. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465
9. Deshpande, S., & Szefer, J. (2023). Analyzing ChatGPT's aptitude in an introductory computer engineering course. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.06122
10. Doshi, R. H., Bajaj, S. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2023). ChatGPT: Temptations of progress. Am. J. Bioethics, 23, 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2180110
11. Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613, 423–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
12. Finnie-Ansley, J., Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Prather, J. (2022). The robots are coming: Exploring the implications of OpenAI Codex on introductory programming. In Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511863
13. Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., et al. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
14. Garvey, C. S. (2019). Artificial intelligence and Japan's fifth generation. Pac. Hist. Rev., 88, 619–658. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2019.88.4.619
15. Gong, T., Lyu, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Zheng, M., Zhao, Q., et al. (2023). MultiModal-GPT: A vision and language model for dialogue with humans. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04790
16. Gordijn, B., & Have, H. A. (2023). ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution? Med. Health Care Philos., 26, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
17. Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchán, E. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need: A state-of-the-art review of large generative AI models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04655
18. Graham, F. (2022). Daily briefing: Will ChatGPT kill the essay assignment? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04437-2
19. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individ. Differ., 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274