Authors :
Christopher J. Rabe
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bd6pysan
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/9jarcszy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb010
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Background: OSHA’s Severe Injury Reporting (SIR) program captures high-severity construction outcomes such as in-patient hospitalization and amputation. However, prevention prioritization commonly relies on incident counts that do not simultaneously represent injury severity, persistence of hazard mechanisms, and access-context conditions related to enforcement and training resources. Methods: This paper presents the Construction Safety Threat Assessment and Reporting (C-STAR) framework—an interpretable severity-based scoring model that converts each SIR record into an incident-level Severe Incident Safety Score (SISS) by summing three factors: OSHA Regulatory Compliance context (ORC), Hazard Incident Severity (HIS), and Hazard Recurrence Probability (HRP). Incident scores are further aggregated to compute a regional-level Regional Safety Risk Score (RSRS) for comparative profiling. Results: C-STAR defines transparent subfactor rules and fixed score ranges, producing interpretable outputs suitable for ranking, tiering, and sensitivity testing by varying scoring assumptions using secondary data only. Conclusions: C-STAR provides a replicable decision-support approach for translating severe injury surveillance into structured risk scoring for prioritization and planning. GIS-based visualization is an optional downstream application of these GIS-ready outputs rather than a required component of the framework.
Keywords :
C-STAR; Severe Injury Reports; Construction Safety; Risk Scoring; Focus Four; Recurrence; ORC; HIS; HRP; SISS; RSRS.
References :
- Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, “OSHA’s ‘Fatal Four’ – The leading causes of death in the construction industry,” 2024.
- J. Jeong and J. Jeong, “Comparative analysis of degree of risk between the frequency aspect and probability aspect using integrated uncertainty method considering work type and accident type in construction industry,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1131, 2022.
- A. Alsharef, A. Albert, I. Awolusi, and E. Jaselskis, “Severe injuries among construction workers: Insights from OSHA’s new severe injury reporting program,” Safety Science, vol. 163, p. 106126, 2023.
- W. B. Gray and J. Mendeloff, “Preventing construction deaths: The role of public policies,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 726–754, 2023.
- C. L. Anderson, M. D. Aguiar, D. Truong, M. A. Friend, J. K. Williams, and M. T. Dickson, “Development of a risk indicator score card for a large, flight training department,” Safety Science, vol. 131, p. 104899, 2020.
- F. Salguero-Caparrós, M. D. C. Pardo-Ferreira, M. Martínez-Rojas, and J. C. Rubio-Romero, “Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety: A literature review,” Safety Science, vol. 121, pp. 111–118, 2020.
- M. Reilly, “Evaluation of the characteristics of injured workers and employer compliance with OSHA’s reporting requirement for work-related amputations,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 154–168, 2024.
- M. R. R. Shaon, S. Zhao, K. Wang, and E. Jackson, “Developing a data-driven network screening procedure for systemic safety approach,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2678, no. 3, pp. 348–364, 2024.
- S. K. Aksha, L. M. Resler, L. Juran, and L. W. Carstensen Jr, “A geospatial analysis of multi-hazard risk in Dharan, Nepal,” Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 88–111, 2020.
- S. E. Wuellner and D. K. Bonauto, “Exploring the relationship between employer recordkeeping and underreporting in the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1133–1143, 2014.
- L. Fenais, P. Koutsourelakis, and E. Markou, “Enhancing decision-making in construction safety using GIS-based visualization,” Automation in Construction, vol. 104, pp. 123–132, 2019.
- M. S. Johnson, D. I. Levine, and M. W. Toffel, “Improving regulatory effectiveness through better targeting: Evidence from OSHA,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 30–67, 2023.
Background: OSHA’s Severe Injury Reporting (SIR) program captures high-severity construction outcomes such as in-patient hospitalization and amputation. However, prevention prioritization commonly relies on incident counts that do not simultaneously represent injury severity, persistence of hazard mechanisms, and access-context conditions related to enforcement and training resources. Methods: This paper presents the Construction Safety Threat Assessment and Reporting (C-STAR) framework—an interpretable severity-based scoring model that converts each SIR record into an incident-level Severe Incident Safety Score (SISS) by summing three factors: OSHA Regulatory Compliance context (ORC), Hazard Incident Severity (HIS), and Hazard Recurrence Probability (HRP). Incident scores are further aggregated to compute a regional-level Regional Safety Risk Score (RSRS) for comparative profiling. Results: C-STAR defines transparent subfactor rules and fixed score ranges, producing interpretable outputs suitable for ranking, tiering, and sensitivity testing by varying scoring assumptions using secondary data only. Conclusions: C-STAR provides a replicable decision-support approach for translating severe injury surveillance into structured risk scoring for prioritization and planning. GIS-based visualization is an optional downstream application of these GIS-ready outputs rather than a required component of the framework.
Keywords :
C-STAR; Severe Injury Reports; Construction Safety; Risk Scoring; Focus Four; Recurrence; ORC; HIS; HRP; SISS; RSRS.