⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Techno-Economic Analysis of the Statistically Optimized Whiteboard Marker Ink Production Process using Municipal Waste Materials Sourced in Ikot Abasi L.G.A.


Authors : Okwudili E. Umeagukwu; Ephraim R. Afia; Inuaeyen N. Inuaeyen; Owoidoho I. Brown

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yj7mwz8p

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct642

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This work investigated the economic viability and optimization of whiteboard marker ink using central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The production was achieved using biochar, bioethanol, and natural resin at the range of 10 - 50 g, glycerol from 100 - 500 mL, and 10g – 50g, respectively. The Ink produced was characterize to check the viscosity, drying time, erasability and density. The ink at optimal condition has a drying time of 3.39s, viscosity of 1.47mPa.s at 30g of biochar, 300 mL of glycerol, and 30g resin. The results were compared to those of commercial inks. The results showed that the viscosity of commercial ink was 2.1mPa∙s. and analysis revealed that the commercial marker ink had the fastest drying rate than the ink produced. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the presence of functional groups associated with the whiteboard marker ink produced. The techno-economic analysis carried out shows that it is viable and promising to invest on whiteboard marker with the raw materials understudied. The overall results show that natural sourced materials are viable and innovative material for whiteboard ink production.

Keywords : Agricultural Waste, Whiteboard Marker Ink, Optimization, Response Surface Methodology, Techno-Economic Analysis.

References :

  1. Abdullah, N., Sulaiman, F., & Gerhauser, H. (2011). Characterisation of oil palm empty fruit bunches for fuel application. J. Phys. Sci, 22(1), 1-24
  2. Afia. E. R., John. J.A., Akam. F. N., Bassey. N. I., Umah. M. K., Kporna. M. N., Joseph B. B., Philip. P. E. (2025) Bioethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW): A Comparative Study on Economic Viability and Physicochemical Characterization of Paper and Plastic bottle Waste in Ikot Abasi L.G.A, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 14(12), Doi: 10.17577/IJERTV14IS120531
  3. Basri DF, Mustari NF, Zainul Alamin ZA et al (2017) Stem bark of Canarium odontophyllum Miq. (dabai) as potential source of antimicrobial agent. J Sains Kesihatan Malaysia 15:1–6. https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2017-1501-01
  4. Basri MSM, Ren BLM, Talib RA et al (2021) Novel mangosteen-leaves-based marker ink: color lightness, viscosity, optimized composition, and microstructural analysis. Polymers 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101581
  5. Blindheim FH, Ruwoldt J (2023) The effect of sample preparation techniques on lignin fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Polymers 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132901
  6. Biswas TT, Yu J, Nierstrasz VA (2022) Piezoelectric inkjet printing of tyrosinase (polyphenol oxidase) enzyme on atmospheric plasma treated polyamide fabric. Sci Rep 12:1–12. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-022-10852-2
  7. Dagde KK, Nwosa G, Ukpaka C (2019) Formulation of whiteboard marker ink using locally sourced raw materials. Eur J Eng Res Sci 4:107–114. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2019.4.3.1108
  8. Ding F, Hu B, Lan S et al (2020) Flexographic and screen printing of carboxymethyl chitosan based edible inks for food packaging applications. Food Package Shelf Life 26:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100559
  9. Duangkham, S., Thuadaij P (2023). Charcterization of charcoal briquettes produced from blending rice straw and banana peel. Heliyon 9 e16305
  10. Hamzah, M. H., · Sheralyn, R. A. S., Adila, F. A. H., Mohd S. M. B., Rosnah S., Mohd, Z. M., · Abd., H. M. A. (2025). Development of novel dabai pulp-based marker ink: optimization of process configurations, physico-chemical properties, and morphological analysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2025) 15:30943–30962 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06921-
  11. Keke, C. O. Winifred N. N., Francis, K. R. K., Godian, C.I., Juliet, C. E., Olachi, L. O.(2023). GCMS and FTIR analysis of ethanol and methanol leave extract of Urena lobata (Caesar weed) for bioactive phytochemical constituents. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics. 2023; 13(1):99-115
  12. Ma Grace C., Abigail J. C., Kazel D., Regine M. T., Sheila B. (2020). Characterization of charcoal produced from different pyrolyzing techniques. Annals of Tropical Research, 42(2), 129-146.
  13. Nwafulugo FU, Samuel F, Nyam T et al (2019) Marker ink production from berry seed extract. I        nt J Sci Eng Res 10:698–704
  14. Nwosibe, P. O., Nwafulugo, F. U, Buhari, M. B. & Samuel, F. (2018). Comparative analysis of local raw materials for the production of a non toxic and erasable water base writing ink for white board marker refill. International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(7), 8-13.
  15. Prasanna MAMD, Siddharthan N, Raguvaran K, Ayyasamy PM et al (2023) Eco-friendly bioremediation of petroleum-based inks from printing machine waste implementing native strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa MDP14. Biomass Convers Biorefin 15:2699–2712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-05101-z
  16. Rocha S, Ascensão G, Maia L (2023) Exploring design optimization of self- compacting mortars with response surface methodology. Appl Sci 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1318104 28
  17. Saidina DS, Eawwiboonthanakit N, Mariatti M et al (2019) Recent development of graphene-based ink and other conductive material-based inks for flexible electronics. J Electron Mater48:3428–3450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07183-w
  18. Soujanya K, Harish A (2021) Synthesizing easily erasable white- board ink using locally available Azadiracta indica (neem) gum. Indian J Sci Technol 14:1320–1324. https:// doi. org/ 10. 17485/ IJST/v14i17.557
  19. Thakker AM, Sun D (2022) Engineering sustainable inks from natural biomaterials for digital printing. Sustain Clim Change 15:272–278. https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0010
  20. Thakker AM, Sun D (2024) Plant-based ink properties and storage stability for inkjet printing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31:8099–8117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31714-y
  21. Tiquia-Arashiro S, Kassem A, Abbas L et al (2023) Applications of Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy in microbial cell biology and environmental microbiology: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Front Microbial 14:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1304081
  22. Umeagukwu O.E., Onukwuli O.D., Ude C.N. (2023). Methanolysis of African pear seed oil catalyzed with acid activated empty palm fruit bunch ash: Optimization and sensitivity analysis, Journal Cleaner Energy System. 6
  23. Umeagukwu O. E., Onukwuli, D.O., Ude, C.N., Esonye  C., Ekwueme, B. N., Asadu, C.O., Okey-Onyesolu, F. C., Mbabuike U. I, Ekuma I. C., Ugwele, F. O. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of the statistically optimized biodiesel production process using African pear seed oil and activated empty palm fruit bunch biocatalyst. Waste Management Bulletin 2, 95–112
  24. Umeagukwu O. E., Onukwuli, D.O., Ude, C.N., Esonye C., Ekwueme, B. N., Asadu, C.O., Okey-Onyesolu, F. C., Mbabuike U. I, Ekuma I. C., Trobjon M., Sokhib I., Imomova M. Y. (2024). Transesterification of Persea americana seed oil to methyl ester using bio-based heterogeneous catalyst: Optimization and techno-economic analysis Green Technologies and Sustainability, 2
  25. Valen EV, Wekking E, Hout MV et al (2018) Chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy: course and prognostic factors of neu-ropsychological functioning. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 91:843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1328-1

This work investigated the economic viability and optimization of whiteboard marker ink using central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The production was achieved using biochar, bioethanol, and natural resin at the range of 10 - 50 g, glycerol from 100 - 500 mL, and 10g – 50g, respectively. The Ink produced was characterize to check the viscosity, drying time, erasability and density. The ink at optimal condition has a drying time of 3.39s, viscosity of 1.47mPa.s at 30g of biochar, 300 mL of glycerol, and 30g resin. The results were compared to those of commercial inks. The results showed that the viscosity of commercial ink was 2.1mPa∙s. and analysis revealed that the commercial marker ink had the fastest drying rate than the ink produced. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the presence of functional groups associated with the whiteboard marker ink produced. The techno-economic analysis carried out shows that it is viable and promising to invest on whiteboard marker with the raw materials understudied. The overall results show that natural sourced materials are viable and innovative material for whiteboard ink production.

Keywords : Agricultural Waste, Whiteboard Marker Ink, Optimization, Response Surface Methodology, Techno-Economic Analysis.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe