Authors :
Subandi Subandi; Muhammad Farhan Masrur; Yogi Bagus Adimas; Cicik Arista; Hans Yosef Tandra Dasion; Masilva Raynox Mael
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3vwe3lY
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7500303
Abstract :
- The Belt and Road Initiative Program (BRI)
program is one of the Chinese propaganda strategy that is
inseparable from the ideological load in order to influence
dominance, and hegemony motifs to the countries in the
region, making its economic and technological power a
capital to place China as a dominant party. Granting aid
loans, became a binding tool to unleash dominance and
influence on the countries of the region. Ideological content
is percolated through to the heads of the countries in the
region through the language of speech texts placed as
written discourse texts which can be studied with
Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic dominance using the
method of critical discourse analysis. Based on the results
of the analysis, the use of language that represents
symbolic dominance behind the speech text is packaged in
the form; 1) Making himself part of the interlocutor, 2)
Making the interlocutor the owner of the concept, 3)
Making the interlocutor an active participator, 4) Making
the equality of the two parties, 5) Bias to the interlocutor,
6) Making oneself the superior party, and 7) Entering
aesthetic values through figurative languages.
Keywords :
Symbolic Domination, Speech Text, Discourse, Representation, Power
- The Belt and Road Initiative Program (BRI)
program is one of the Chinese propaganda strategy that is
inseparable from the ideological load in order to influence
dominance, and hegemony motifs to the countries in the
region, making its economic and technological power a
capital to place China as a dominant party. Granting aid
loans, became a binding tool to unleash dominance and
influence on the countries of the region. Ideological content
is percolated through to the heads of the countries in the
region through the language of speech texts placed as
written discourse texts which can be studied with
Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic dominance using the
method of critical discourse analysis. Based on the results
of the analysis, the use of language that represents
symbolic dominance behind the speech text is packaged in
the form; 1) Making himself part of the interlocutor, 2)
Making the interlocutor the owner of the concept, 3)
Making the interlocutor an active participator, 4) Making
the equality of the two parties, 5) Bias to the interlocutor,
6) Making oneself the superior party, and 7) Entering
aesthetic values through figurative languages.
Keywords :
Symbolic Domination, Speech Text, Discourse, Representation, Power
