Authors : Shatabdi Nannaware; Dr. Poornima Sherawat; Dr.Naresh Babu

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://shorturl.at/UpQnE

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/smwz8j94

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN646

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) technologies have rapidly revolutionized learning processes by providing immersive digital experiences, interactive environments, simulations, and interactive opportunities These technologies has gained traction in education, and offers learning opportunities enhanced by technology. They offer a wide range of benefits for students and teachers, making learning fun and engaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the acceptance and perception of AR and VR technologies among students in education and their potential to enhance their learning experiences. Various theoretical frameworks such as the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) are considered to understand the adoption of AR and VR technologies in education. There are quality systems and user input The study aims to address gaps in existing research through an enhanced model that includes user experience variables, specific AR and VR variables, and specific usability factors for university students, especially in business. However, the limitations of the study are acknowledged, as the proposed framework is based solely on a literature review. Further research efforts will focus on establishing the validity and reliability of this theoretical framework through primary data collection and quantitative analysis.

References :

1. Al-Ansi , A. M., Jaboob b , M., Garad c, A., & Al-Ansi , A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent developments in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open.
2. Arendse, P. (2013). Concept of Reality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 2251836
3. Chahal, J., & Rani, N. (2022). Exploring the acceptance for e-learning among higher education students in India: combining technology acceptance model with external variables. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09327-0
4. Chen, C. (2020). AR videos as scaffolding to foster students’ learning achievements and motivation in EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bjet.12902
5. Divatia, A. S., Tikoria, J., & Lakdawala, S. (2020). Emerging trends and impact of business intelligence & analytics in organizations: Case studies from India. Business Information Review, 38(1), 026638212096926. Sagepub. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0266382120969265
6. Du, R., Turner, E., Dzitsiuk, M., Prasso, L., Duarte, I., Dourgarian, J., Afonso, J., Pascoal, J., Gladstone, J., Cruces, N., Izadi, S., Kowdle, A., Tsotsos, K., & Kim, D. (2020). DepthLab: Real-time 3D Interaction with Depth Maps for Mobile Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415881
7. Dummett, M. (2007). Thought and Reality. Ars Disputandi, Volume 7 (2007). www.researchgate.net/ profile/Benjamin-Murphy/publication/27710435_ Thought_and_Reality/links/0c96053976bb0d1bac000000/Thought-and-Reality.pdf
8. Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M.-C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education, 64, 24–41. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015
9. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2021). A Systematic Review of AR and VR Enhanced Language Learning. Sustainability, 13(9), 4639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094639
10. Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L’Administration, 33(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1381
11. Kurilovas, E. (2016). Evaluation of quality and personalisation of VR/AR/MR learning systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11), 998–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016. 1212929
12. Muschio, G., Zhu, J., & Foster, A. (2015). Revitalizing Peale’s Museum as a digital interactive learning environment. https://doi.org/10.1109/digitalheritage. 2015.7419598
13. Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2018a). Patient-centric ICTs based healthcare for students with learning, physical and/or sensory disabilities. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tele.2017.09.002
14. Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2018b). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
15. Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020). User Acceptance of Virtual Reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
16. Shrestha, Indra Mani & Luitel, Bal & Pant, Binod & Dahal, Niroj & Manandhar, Netra. (2023)
17. Shrestha et al. (2022) STEAM-education-for-school-teachers-in-Nepal
18. Shrestha, S., Shan, Y., & Chung, B. (2022). Exploring the Benefits of Social Presence Enabled Augmented Reality Platform for Online Learners. Construction Research Congress 2022. https://doi.org/10.1061/ 9780784483985.026
19. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information technology: toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. JStor. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 30036540
20. Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., Anandkumar, A., Bergen, K., Gomes, C. P., Ho, S., Kohli, P., Lasenby, J., Leskovec, J., Liu, T.-Y., Manrai, A., & Marks, D. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620(7972), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2