Authors :
Dr. Jyoti Murmu
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3vr4ctb4
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4nj49pdc
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May1401
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Strategic minerals represent key elements of the global economy, forming the backbone of high-tech industries
and crucial processes within energy generation and transition. Due to the growing demand for key international
capabilities and technologies, the Central Asian region has declared the search and exploitation of strategic minerals as
national priorities. Several countries such as the United States, Japan, and the European Union have classified minerals
and metals as critical to national security or strategic goals. For the purpose of this research, strategic minerals are
categorized into five groups depending on their increased technical and market interest due to their current or future
strategic importance: Energy Minerals, Non-Fuel Metabolic Minerals, Geomaterials for Infrastructure Development,
Industrial-Enabled Critical Materials, and Circular Economy & Environmental Protection Materials. Strategic minerals
relevant to Central Asia include the energy minerals, such as uranium and thermal coal; non-fuel metabolic minerals, such
as iron, copper, zinc, lead, and a lack of lithium; geomaterials for infrastructural development, such as gypsum and
construction stone ; industrial-enabled critical materials, such as tungsten, antimony, bismuth, rare earth elements, and
cadmium; circular-economy materials, such as waste gypsum and waste paper. This paper will analyze the preliminary
identification of strategic minerals, related Demand-Drivers, substitution Options and their Global Benchmark to
compare with Central Asian record. Demand-Drivers reflect the primary sectors and industries driving the mineral
demand while substitution Options reflect the issues, concerns or alternatives for the specific materials availability to
rethink the exploration and extraction of these minerals in post pandemic in Central Asia.
Keywords :
Minerals, Geopolitics, Central Asia, Supply Chain, Regional Powers.
References :
- Zhang, C. (2022). China’s emergence and development challenges that China faces in Central Asia.
- L. Gulley, A., T. Nassar, N., & Xun, S. (2018). China, the United States, and competition for resources that enable emerging technologies.
- T. Nassar, N., Brainard, J., Gulley, A., Manley, R., Matos, G., Lederer, G., R. Bird, L., Pineault, D., Alonso, E., Gambogi, J., & M. Fortier, S. (2020). Evaluating the mineral commodity supply risk of the U.S. manufacturing sector.
- Guo, L., Zhou, H., Xia, Z., & Huang, F. (2016). Evolution, opportunity and challenges of transboundary water and energy problems in Central Asia.
- Fatima, Q. & Zafar, S. (2020). New Great Game: Players, Interests, Strategies and Central Asia..
- Yuan, X., Ma, Z., Wang, A., Li, T., Zhong, W., Li, B., Li, P., Wei, J., & Hao, H. (2023). Structural analysis of global mineral governance system from the perspective of country.
- Brown, R. (2016). Where Will the New Silk Road Lead? The Effects of Chinese Investment and Migration in Xinjiang and Central Asia.
- Kassenova, N. (2009). The impact of the global economic crisis on Central Asia and its implications for the EU engagement. EUCAP Working Paper No. 5, 21 October 2009.
- Arazmuradov, A. (2011). Foreign aid, foreign direct investment and domestic investment nexus in landlocked economies of Central Asia.
- Bragg, M. (2014). Central Asian Security: With a Focus on Kazakhstan.
- Qi, W. (2024). Revisiting the Resource Curse in the Age of Energy Transition: Cobalt Reserves and Conflict in Africa.
- Lewis, D. G. (2018). Central Asia: Fractured region, illiberal regionalism.
- Winn, N. & Gänzle, S. (2022). Recalibrating EU Foreign Policy vis-à-vis Central Asia: Towards Principled Pragmatism and Resilience.
- Glazyrina, I. & Lavlinskii, S. (2017). Transaction Costs and Prospects for Public-private Partnership in the Russian Mineral Resourse Sector.
- Vinokurov, E., Libman, A., & Maqsimchook, N. (2010). Динамика интеграционных процессов в Центральной Азии.
- Brown, T. (2018). Measurement of mineral supply diversity and its importance in assessing risk and criticality.
- Popović, V., Živanović Miljković, J., Subić, J., Jean-Vasile, A., Nedelcu, A., & Eugen, N. (2015). Sustainable Land Management in Mining Areas in Serbia and Romania.
- Xing, M. (2015). The impact of a strong local supply chain on regional economic impacts of mining.
- Goodland, R. (2012). Responsible Mining: The Key to Profitable Resource Development.
- Erjan, A. (2018). Economic diversification issues in oil-exporting countries : case of the Republic of Kazakhstan = Gazdasági diverzifikációs kérdések olaj-exportáló országokban : a Kazah Köztársaság.
- Niquet, V. (2007). China and Central Asia.
Strategic minerals represent key elements of the global economy, forming the backbone of high-tech industries
and crucial processes within energy generation and transition. Due to the growing demand for key international
capabilities and technologies, the Central Asian region has declared the search and exploitation of strategic minerals as
national priorities. Several countries such as the United States, Japan, and the European Union have classified minerals
and metals as critical to national security or strategic goals. For the purpose of this research, strategic minerals are
categorized into five groups depending on their increased technical and market interest due to their current or future
strategic importance: Energy Minerals, Non-Fuel Metabolic Minerals, Geomaterials for Infrastructure Development,
Industrial-Enabled Critical Materials, and Circular Economy & Environmental Protection Materials. Strategic minerals
relevant to Central Asia include the energy minerals, such as uranium and thermal coal; non-fuel metabolic minerals, such
as iron, copper, zinc, lead, and a lack of lithium; geomaterials for infrastructural development, such as gypsum and
construction stone ; industrial-enabled critical materials, such as tungsten, antimony, bismuth, rare earth elements, and
cadmium; circular-economy materials, such as waste gypsum and waste paper. This paper will analyze the preliminary
identification of strategic minerals, related Demand-Drivers, substitution Options and their Global Benchmark to
compare with Central Asian record. Demand-Drivers reflect the primary sectors and industries driving the mineral
demand while substitution Options reflect the issues, concerns or alternatives for the specific materials availability to
rethink the exploration and extraction of these minerals in post pandemic in Central Asia.
Keywords :
Minerals, Geopolitics, Central Asia, Supply Chain, Regional Powers.