Authors :
Haddy Drammeh Jaye
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5db95pzy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1599
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study investigates staff motivation at the Gambia National Library and its impact on employee performance
and service delivery. Motivation is shown to be crucial for institutional effectiveness, yet a significant gap exists between
staff expectations and current motivational practices. Demotivating factors include poor communication, limited
recognition, few career progression opportunities, and underinvestment in staff development.
Using a quantitative descriptive design, structured questionnaires were administered to 45 permanent staff members
(90% of the workforce). The study assessed motivational factors such as recognition, supervision, remuneration, training,
and promotion, and measured workforce effectiveness through staff morale, task completion, and productivity. Data
analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between motivation and performance (Pearson’s r = 0.72, p < 0.01).
Recognition (82%), training (76%), and promotion (68%) were identified as key motivators, though only 44% were satisfied
with remuneration. Staff with higher motivation were 35% more likely to meet or exceed performance targets.
Findings confirm that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators are vital for staff effectiveness. Leadership style,
organisational culture, and participatory decision-making also play important roles. The study recommends transparent
communication, regular training, merit-based rewards, and a supportive work environment to sustain motivation and
improve institutional outcomes.
References :
- Appleton, S. (2018). Employee Motivation and Organizational Performance. Oxford University Press.
- Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human need. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
- Andretti, D. (2001). Employee motivation and organizational performance. Journal of Human Resource Development, 7(3), 45–58.
- Appleton, S. (2018). Employee Motivation and Organizational Performance. Oxford University Press.
- Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (1999). Management: Building competitive advantage (4th ed.). Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
- Bhatnagar, J., & Srivastava, P. (2012). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A study of IT professionals in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(1), 153–169.
- Frost, S. (2019). The Importance of Employee Training and Development in the Workplace. Chron.
- Harper, M. (2019). The Effects of Understaffing on Organizational Growth and Efficiency. Business.com.
- Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Higuera, V. (2019). How Understaffing Affects Employee Productivity. Houston Chronicle.
- Jones, G. R. (2000). Organizational theory, design, and change (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Kimani, J. N. (2015). Employee motivation and organizational performance: A case study of selected NGOs in Nairobi. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v5i1.6894
- Kotze, K. (2009). Applying Maslow’s hierarchy of needs in workplace motivation. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 6(2), 56–67.
- Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Luthans, F. (1998). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Management Study Guide. (2019). Motivation - Introduction. Retrieved from www.managementstudyguide.com
- Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
- McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Scott Foresman.
- McFarlin, K. (2019). Workplace Challenges That Affect Employee Motivation. Small Business - Chron.com
- McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
- McShane, S. L., Olekalns, M., & Travaglione, T. (2010). Organizational behavior on the Pacific Rim (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Australia.
- Miner, J. B. (2005). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership. M. E. Sharpe.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
- Schwartz, T. (2013). The way we’re working isn’t working: The four forgotten needs that energize great performance. Free Press.
- Shemiah, S. (2017). Employee motivation and productivity in public libraries: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Library Management, 33(2), 78–90.
- Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). Motivation and work behavior (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
- Wanous, J. P., & Zwany, A. (1977). A cross-sectional test of need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90051-X
This study investigates staff motivation at the Gambia National Library and its impact on employee performance
and service delivery. Motivation is shown to be crucial for institutional effectiveness, yet a significant gap exists between
staff expectations and current motivational practices. Demotivating factors include poor communication, limited
recognition, few career progression opportunities, and underinvestment in staff development.
Using a quantitative descriptive design, structured questionnaires were administered to 45 permanent staff members
(90% of the workforce). The study assessed motivational factors such as recognition, supervision, remuneration, training,
and promotion, and measured workforce effectiveness through staff morale, task completion, and productivity. Data
analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between motivation and performance (Pearson’s r = 0.72, p < 0.01).
Recognition (82%), training (76%), and promotion (68%) were identified as key motivators, though only 44% were satisfied
with remuneration. Staff with higher motivation were 35% more likely to meet or exceed performance targets.
Findings confirm that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators are vital for staff effectiveness. Leadership style,
organisational culture, and participatory decision-making also play important roles. The study recommends transparent
communication, regular training, merit-based rewards, and a supportive work environment to sustain motivation and
improve institutional outcomes.