Space Debris: Assessing Risks and Strategic Mitigation for Sustainable Space Operations: A Qualitative Study


Authors : Nandini Choudhary

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/472jdkxt

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3mpabudc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1945

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : As scientific inventions make significant strides in modern times, humans have made considerable progress in scaling worlds beyond our own. This has resulted in our species exploring outer space, wherein each day brings along novel avenues of planetary exploration. However, with each innovation directed towards it, there has risen a continuous threat of increasing space debris beyond our immediate atmosphere [1]. Space Debris can be defined as a byproduct of humans’ expanding presence in outer space. Although normal human vision cannot see space debris in the sky, it often marks its presence in low Earth orbit (LEO) [2]. This has emerged as a highly concerning challenge in the current times. Beyond being an eminent threat to planet Earth and its residents, it also poses a hurdle to sustainable space operations [3]. Space debris comprises objects such as inactive satellites, spent rocket stages, fragments from collisions, and other defunct objects. This poses a significant threat to various extra-terrestrial entities such as operational satellites, human-crewed missions, and future space exploration [4]. This exponential increase in orbital debris, along with the growing dependency of mankind on space-based technologies has amplified concerns over the long- term sustainability of Earth’s orbital environment [4] [3]. This paper aims to examine the plethora of risks space/orbital debris poses. It further explores the current and futuristic strategies that can be applied for its mitigation. Building on the same, the paper will also elaborate upon the critical threats posed by space debris, such as significant financial losses, hurdled communication networks, and cascading debris creation which is also known as the Kessler Syndrom [5]. Another crucial threat that such significant debris accumulation causes is its re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere. This poses a risk to terrestrial safety [6]. What makes these risks more critical are the scientific and technological limitations in tracking, predicting, and managing the growing debris population. Even though the current detection systems are highly advanced, they often fall short in monitoring smaller debris fragments that are highly hazardous due to their high velocities [7]. Moving further, we will look into the various efforts that are being made to mitigate space debris. These include both active and passive strategies, which not only focus on preventing debris generation through improved satellite design, end- of-life disposal protocols, and adherence to international guidelines, but also include key aspects of debris removal techniques such as robotics arms, nets, and lasers deployment [8]. Even though these solutions are innovative and promising, they are still in their nascency and thus face key technological, financial, and legal challenges. Lastly, as we consider the regulatory frameworks, international organizations such as the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) and other space agencies like NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) have put forward various guidelines. These frameworks aim to address the growing challenge related to space debris. However, the implementation of these guidelines is also impacted occasionally owing to the lack of binding agreements and enforcement mechanisms. This results in a lack of global compliance [9] [10]. The paper will also shed light on case studies of successful debris management missions and as a result highlight emerging technologies that could impactfully transform space debris mitigation. Moreover, the paper will further explore the importance of establishing international collaboration to advance research and increase debris management investments. Thus, it can be seen that space debris presents a critical challenge that requires immediate coordinated attention from not just governments and space agencies, but also from the private sector entities. Once the risks associated with the same are meticulously analysed, strategic mitigation measures can be implemented. This will allow humans to safeguard the orbital environment for future generations. It will also enable them to ensure the sustainability of space operations better.

Keywords : Space Debris, Orbital Sustainability, Collision Risks, Mitigation Strategies, Active Debris Removal, International Collaboration, Kessler Syndrome.

References :

  1. Aerospace, "Space Debris and Space Traffic Management," 14 November 2018. [Online]. Available: https://aerospace.org/space-debris. [Accessed 14 January 2025].
  2. "Space Debris," National Aeronautics and Space Administration - NASA, [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/headquarters/library/find/bibliographies/space-debris/. [Accessed 14 January 2025 ].
  3. J. A. Vedda, "Challenges to the Sustainability of Space Exploration," The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 22-49, 04 March 2008.
  4. S. Kaineg, "The Growing Problem of Space Debris," Hastings Envt'l LJ, vol. 26, p. 277, 2020.
  5. The European Space Agency, "About space debris," [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/About_space_debris. [Accessed 14 January 2025].
  6. M. Matney, "Measuring Small Debris – What You Can’t See Can Hurt You," in VKI Lee Series, Space Debris Reentry and Mitigation, Brussels, Belgium, September 12-14, 2016.
  7. M. A. P. Joel A. Dennerley, "Managing the Risks Associated with Space Debris," in Risk Management in Outer Space Activities, Singapore, Springer, 2022, pp. 107-149.
  8. J.-M. R. M.-C. D. Christophe Bonnal, "Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends," Acta Astronautica, vol. 85, pp. 51-60, 2013.
  9. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, "Space Law," United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/index.html. [Accessed 14 January 2025 ].
  10. United Nations, "International Space Law Explained," United Nations, [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/en/peace-and-security/international-space-law-explained. [Accessed 2025 January 2025].
  11. D. Hoffpauir, "Space Debris: Understanding the Risks to NASA Spacecraft," 11 July 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/nesc/space-debris-understanding-the-risks-to-nasa-spacecraft/. [Accessed 16 January 2025].
  12. K. Richardson, "Future of Satellites," 31 October 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.shapingtomorrow.com/home/alert/3769106-Future-of-Satellites. [Accessed 16 January 2025].
  13. OECD Secretariat, "SPACE SUSTAINABILITY: THE ECONOMICS OF SPACE DEBRIS IN PERSPECTIVE," OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY: POLICY PAPERS, no. 87, 11 March 2020.
  14. D. Patton, "Is Space a Global Commons?," Secure World Foundaion, 2022.
  15. A. Ferreira-Snyman, "Outer Space Exploration and the Sustainability of the Space Environment – An Uneasy Relationship," Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, vol. 26, no. 1, 29 April 2024.
  16. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "Orbital Debris Management & Risk Mitigation," National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
  17. NASA, "Photo Gallery," [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/history/sputnik/gallerysput.html. [Accessed 17 January 2025].
  18. K. Buchholz, "It’s Getting Crowded up in Space," Statista.com, 1 June 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/chart/24980/space-debris-in-orbit/. [Accessed 18 January 2025].
  19. A. Gautier, "Rubble Trouble," National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 28 December 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/feature-articles/rubble-trouble. [Accessed 17 January 2025].
  20. Aerospace.org, "Space Debris 101," Aerospace, [Online]. Available: https://aerospace.org/article/space-debris-101. [Accessed 18 January 2025].
  21. J. S. Cooney, "International Space Station (ISS) Orbital Debris Collision Avoidance Process," October 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160012726/downloads/20160012726.pdf. [Accessed 18 January 2025].
  22. NASA, "International Space Station," NASA.gov, 23 May 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/reference/international-space-station/. [Accessed 18 January 2025].
  23. B. G. C.-P. Donald J. Kessler, "Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt," Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 83, no. A6, pp. 2441-2727, 1 June 1978.
  24. N. L. J. J.-C. L. M. M. Donald J. Kessler, "The Kessler Syndrome: Implications to Future Space operations," in 33rd ANNUAL AAS GUIDANCE AND CONTROL CONFERENCE , Colorado, 2010.
  25. E. S. J.-C. L. M. H. C. S. D. W. Nicholas L. Johnson, "The characteristics and consequences of the break-up of the Fengyun-1C spacecraft," Acta Astronautica, vol. 63, no. 1-4, pp. 128-135, July-August 2008.
  26. P. A.-M. J. N. O. Chris L Ostrom, "Revisiting the Effectiveness of Debris Mitigation by Back-Dating Fragmentation Events," in 2nd International Orbital Debris, Texas, 2023, December 04.
  27. R. Buchs, "Collision risk from space debris: Current status, challenges and response strategies," International Risk Governance Center, Lausanne, 2021.
  28. J. Nicholas, "The Collision of Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251: The Shape of Things to Come," in 60th International Astronautical Congress, Seoul, 2009.
  29. M. Swan, "Anti-satellite Tests: A Risk to The Security and Sustainability of Outer Space," Liberty University Journal of Statesmanship & Public Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, 2022.
  30. D. Stroikos, "Still Lost in Space? Understanding China and India’s Anti-Satellite Tests through an Eclectic Approach," ASTROPOLITICS, vol. 21, no. 2-3, pp. 179-205, 8 November 2023.
  31. J. O'Callaghan, "What is space junk and why is it a problem?," [Online]. Available: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-is-space-junk-and-why-is-it-a-problem.html. [Accessed 20 January 2025].
  32. D. B. Weeden, "Insight - Catalyzing Remediation of Large Space Debris," Secure World Foundation, 19 March 2024. [Online]. Available: https://swfound.org/news/all-news/2024/03/insight-catalyzing-remediation-of-large-space-debris. [Accessed 21 January 2025].
  33. The European Space Agency, "ESA Space Environment Report 2024," 2024.
  34. ESA Space Debris Office, "ESA’S ANNUAL SPACE ENVIRONMENT REPORT," The European Space Agency, 19 July 2024.
  35. B. Allen, "List of SpaceX Starlink launches for August 2024," 31 August 2024. [Online]. Available: https://earthsky.org/spaceflight/list-of-spacex-starlink-launches-for-august-2024/. [Accessed 22 January 2025].
  36. C. E. Howard, "ISS Launches Largest Satellite to Date to Test Active Debris Removal," SAE Internationa| Mobility Engineering, 5 July 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mobilityengineeringtech.com/component/content/article/43618-sae-ma-02929. [Accessed 22 January 2025].
  37. B. Weeden, "2007 Chinese Anti-Satellite Test Fact Sheet," Secure World Foundation, 2010.
  38. P. A. Bao Tran, "Space Debris Crisis: How Many Objects Are Orbiting Earth? (Latest Risk & Cleanup Stats)," 14 February 2025. [Online]. Available: https://patentpc.com/blog/space-debris-crisis-how-many-objects-are-orbiting-earth-latest-risk-cleanup-stats. [Accessed 24 February 2025].
  39. The European Space Agency, "The current state of space debris," The European Space Agency, 12 October 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/The_current_state_of_space_debris. [Accessed 23 January 2025].
  40. B. Tingley, "Whew! 23-ton Chinese rocket debris falls to Earth over Pacific Ocean," Space.com, 4 November 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.space.com/china-long-march-5b-rocket-falls-into-pacific-ocean. [Accessed 24 January 2025].
  41. "Long March 5B: Debris from Chinese rocket falls back to Earth," BBC, 31 July 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62333546. [Accessed 25 January 2025].
  42. B. Weeden, "2009 Iridium-Cosmos Collision Fact Sheet," 10 November 2010. [Online]. Available: https://swfound.org/media/6575/swf_iridium_cosmos_collision_fact_sheet_updated_2012.pdf. [Accessed 23 January 2025].
  43. T.S.Kelso, "Analysis of the 2007 Chinese ASAT Test and the Impact of its Debris on the Space Environment," 2007.
  44. T. Reichhardt, "Satellite Smashers," Smithsonian Magazine, March 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/satellite-smashers-25098285/. [Accessed 25 January 2025].
  45. FlyPixAI, "Orbital Debris Tracking: Emerging Solutions to Mitigate Space Junk," 13 December 2024. [Online]. Available: https://flypix.ai/blog/orbital-debris-tracking/. [Accessed 25 January 2025].
  46. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "State-of-the-Art of Small Spacecraft Technology," National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 5 February 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/identification-and-tracking-systems/. [Accessed 8 February 2025].
  47. The European Space Agency, "Scanning and observing," [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Scanning_and_observing2. [Accessed 02 February 2025].
  48. J. A. Blake, Optical imaging of space debris in low and high altitude orbits, Warwick: University of Warwick, 2021.
  49. K.-C. Lin, An Orbital Debris Active Protection System for Space Stations in Low Earth Orbit, Houston: University of Houston, 2020.
  50. Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program.
  51. The European Space Agency, "Using lasers to track space debris," 28 August 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Shaping_the_Future/Using_lasers_to_track_space_debris. [Accessed 03 February 2025].
  52. J. W. Campbell, Project ORION: Orbital Debris Removal Using Ground-Based Sensors and Lasers, 1996.
  53. "NASA’S EFFORTS TO MITIGATE THE RISKS POSED BY ORBITAL DEBRIS," National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2021.
  54. T. J. C. L. R. A. A. H. C. S. Jericho Locke, "Cost and Benefit Analysis of Mitigating, Tracking, and Remediating Orbital Debris," NASA, Washington DC, 2024.
  55. A. L. Alexis Petit, "The impact of the atmospheric model and of the space weather data on the dynamics of clouds of space debris," Advances in Space Research, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2245-2258, 1 June 2016.
  56. United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, "Space Law Treaties and Principles," United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties.html. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  57. United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies," [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introouterspacetreaty.html. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  58. United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, "Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects," [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introliability-convention.html. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  59. United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, "Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space," United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introregistration-convention.html. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  60. United Nations: Office for Outer Space Affairs, Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Vienna: United Nations, 2021.
  61. D. Singh, "Rising Menace Of Space Debris: Understanding the International Legal Jurisprudence to Regulate Space Debris and Subsequent Challenges," 07 July 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dnluslj.in/rising-menace-of-space-debris-understanding-the-international-legal-jurisprudence-to-regulate-space-debris-and-subsequent-challenges/. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  62. NASA Technology Transfer Program, "environmental science earth air space exoplanet Orbital Debris Engineering Model (ORDEM), Version 3.2.0 (MSC-25457-1)," NASA.gov, [Online]. Available: https://software.nasa.gov/software/MSC-25457-1. [Accessed 05 February 2025].
  63. J.-. C. Liou, "Highlights of Recent Research Activities at the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office," in 7th European Conference on Space Debris, 2017.
  64. The European Space Agency, About the Space Debris Office, The European Space Agency.
  65. The European Space Agency , Clean and eco-friendly space, The European Space Agency .
  66. A. K. T. I. T. N. Fumihiro Hayashi, "Unveiling the resource potential of space debris: A forecast of valuable metals to 2050," Waste Management, vol. 193, pp. 376-385, 1 February 2025.
  67. T. Pultarova, "Watch a Satellite Fire a Harpoon in Space in Wild Debris-Catching Test (Video)," Space.com, 18 February 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.space.com/space-junk-harpoon-removedebris-satellite-video.html. [Accessed 06 February 2025].
  68. J. G. E. G. Minghe Shan, "Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 80, pp. 18-32, 2016.
  69. S. T. S. T. T. Md Abdur Rakib, "A review of shielding systems for protecting off-earth structures from micrometeoroid and orbital debris impact," Acta Astronautica, vol. 223, pp. 404-425, October 2024.
  70. X. L. Y. L. G. H. X. W. G. Z. H. T. Zhibin ZHANG, "Modularity, reconfigurability, and autonomy for the future in spacecraft: A review," Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 282-315, July 2023.
  71. J. R. J. K. G. K. W. Alberta Carpenter, "Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Management Options for Construction and Demolition Debris," Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 396-406, June 2013.
  72. J. F. S.-J. M. L. Roberto Armellin, "End-of-life disposal of high elliptical orbit missions: The case of INTEGRAL," Advances in Space Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 479-493, 1 August 2015.
  73. Anywaves, "The Haunting Side of Space: Graveyard Orbits," 11 October 2023. [Online]. Available: https://anywaves.com/resources/blog/the-haunting-side-of-space-graveyard-orbits/. [Accessed 06 February 2025].
  74. The European Space Agency, "ClearSpace-1," The European Space Agency, [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/ClearSpace-1. [Accessed 06 February 2025].
  75. A. Ramachandran, "The Integration of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Propulsion Systems Transforming Aerospace Engineering for Sustainable and Interstellar Applications," ResearchGate, 10 January 2025.
  76. The European Space Agency, Clean Space, The European Space Agency.
  77. Airbus, "Remove DEBRIS | Testing technology to clear out space junk," [Online]. Available: https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/space/earth-observation/removedebris. [Accessed 06 February 2025].

As scientific inventions make significant strides in modern times, humans have made considerable progress in scaling worlds beyond our own. This has resulted in our species exploring outer space, wherein each day brings along novel avenues of planetary exploration. However, with each innovation directed towards it, there has risen a continuous threat of increasing space debris beyond our immediate atmosphere [1]. Space Debris can be defined as a byproduct of humans’ expanding presence in outer space. Although normal human vision cannot see space debris in the sky, it often marks its presence in low Earth orbit (LEO) [2]. This has emerged as a highly concerning challenge in the current times. Beyond being an eminent threat to planet Earth and its residents, it also poses a hurdle to sustainable space operations [3]. Space debris comprises objects such as inactive satellites, spent rocket stages, fragments from collisions, and other defunct objects. This poses a significant threat to various extra-terrestrial entities such as operational satellites, human-crewed missions, and future space exploration [4]. This exponential increase in orbital debris, along with the growing dependency of mankind on space-based technologies has amplified concerns over the long- term sustainability of Earth’s orbital environment [4] [3]. This paper aims to examine the plethora of risks space/orbital debris poses. It further explores the current and futuristic strategies that can be applied for its mitigation. Building on the same, the paper will also elaborate upon the critical threats posed by space debris, such as significant financial losses, hurdled communication networks, and cascading debris creation which is also known as the Kessler Syndrom [5]. Another crucial threat that such significant debris accumulation causes is its re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere. This poses a risk to terrestrial safety [6]. What makes these risks more critical are the scientific and technological limitations in tracking, predicting, and managing the growing debris population. Even though the current detection systems are highly advanced, they often fall short in monitoring smaller debris fragments that are highly hazardous due to their high velocities [7]. Moving further, we will look into the various efforts that are being made to mitigate space debris. These include both active and passive strategies, which not only focus on preventing debris generation through improved satellite design, end- of-life disposal protocols, and adherence to international guidelines, but also include key aspects of debris removal techniques such as robotics arms, nets, and lasers deployment [8]. Even though these solutions are innovative and promising, they are still in their nascency and thus face key technological, financial, and legal challenges. Lastly, as we consider the regulatory frameworks, international organizations such as the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) and other space agencies like NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) have put forward various guidelines. These frameworks aim to address the growing challenge related to space debris. However, the implementation of these guidelines is also impacted occasionally owing to the lack of binding agreements and enforcement mechanisms. This results in a lack of global compliance [9] [10]. The paper will also shed light on case studies of successful debris management missions and as a result highlight emerging technologies that could impactfully transform space debris mitigation. Moreover, the paper will further explore the importance of establishing international collaboration to advance research and increase debris management investments. Thus, it can be seen that space debris presents a critical challenge that requires immediate coordinated attention from not just governments and space agencies, but also from the private sector entities. Once the risks associated with the same are meticulously analysed, strategic mitigation measures can be implemented. This will allow humans to safeguard the orbital environment for future generations. It will also enable them to ensure the sustainability of space operations better.

Keywords : Space Debris, Orbital Sustainability, Collision Risks, Mitigation Strategies, Active Debris Removal, International Collaboration, Kessler Syndrome.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe