Authors :
Ibrahim Lekan Jubril
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/y4up32uf
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5dyf9cha
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr306
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Objectives:
To quantify domain-specific patient satisfaction across clinical and non-clinical service dimensions in a private
specialist hospital in northern Nigeria; to identify service dimensions most strongly associated with overall satisfaction; and
to segment the patient population by satisfaction profile in order to characterise groups whose experience is
disproportionately shaped by non-clinical operational deficiencies.
Design:
Quantitative cross-sectional study. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and
silhouette-optimised K-means clustering.
Setting:
Private specialist hospital, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria. Data collection period: January to June 2024.
Participants:
64 adult patients (response rate 85.3%) recruited via systematic random sampling from facility records. Eligibility
required documented care attendance within the preceding four weeks and capacity to provide informed verbal consent.
Outcome Measures:
Patient satisfaction across nine service domains, operationalised through a structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s α =
0.82), rated on a 20-point composite Likert scale. Primary domains included staff competence, empathy, communication
clarity, treatment outcomes, administrative efficiency, and infrastructural adequacy.
Results:
Clinical service domains returned consistently high satisfaction scores (staff competence: mean 17.89, SD 3.52;
empathy: mean 18.12, SD 3.27; treatment outcomes: mean 17.91, SD 4.02). Non-clinical domains scored substantially lower
(filing system efficiency: mean 12.81, SD 2.12; maintenance responsiveness: mean 12.50, SD 3.98). Staff professionalism was
the strongest correlate of overall satisfaction (r = 0.78, p < 0.01). K-means clustering identified two patient segments: Cluster
1 (uniformly high satisfaction) and Cluster 2, whose overall experience was disproportionately depressed by deficiencies in
administrative and infrastructural domains, despite clinical scores equivalent to Cluster 1.
Conclusions:
The study identifies a structural pattern termed service visibility bias, in which clinical interactions receive
disproportionate investment attention relative to operational systems, producing a pronounced satisfaction gap between
clinical and non-clinical domains. Targeted investment in administrative efficiency and facility infrastructure represents the
highest-leverage intervention for closing this gap. Multi-centre replication is required to establish the generalisability of
these findings across the Nigerian private specialist hospital sector.
Keywords :
Patient Satisfaction, Service Visibility Bias, Donabedian Framework, Private Specialist Hospital, K-Means Clustering, Healthcare Quality, Kano, Nigeria, LMIC Health Systems.
References :
- Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria. National Health Policy 2016. Abuja: FMOH; 2016.
- Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
- Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: A study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(9):1359–1370. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00235-5
- Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25(1):25–36.
- Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201–203. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1211775
- Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47–55. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S12985
- Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(16):1628–1638. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0900592
- Ghosh S, Scott JE. Predictive analytics in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. J Big Data. 2018;5(1):69. doi:10.1186/s40537-018-0127-3
- Okafor IP, Sekoni AO, Ezeokoli FC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction at a secondary health facility in south-west Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2012;15(1):8–13.
Objectives:
To quantify domain-specific patient satisfaction across clinical and non-clinical service dimensions in a private
specialist hospital in northern Nigeria; to identify service dimensions most strongly associated with overall satisfaction; and
to segment the patient population by satisfaction profile in order to characterise groups whose experience is
disproportionately shaped by non-clinical operational deficiencies.
Design:
Quantitative cross-sectional study. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and
silhouette-optimised K-means clustering.
Setting:
Private specialist hospital, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria. Data collection period: January to June 2024.
Participants:
64 adult patients (response rate 85.3%) recruited via systematic random sampling from facility records. Eligibility
required documented care attendance within the preceding four weeks and capacity to provide informed verbal consent.
Outcome Measures:
Patient satisfaction across nine service domains, operationalised through a structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s α =
0.82), rated on a 20-point composite Likert scale. Primary domains included staff competence, empathy, communication
clarity, treatment outcomes, administrative efficiency, and infrastructural adequacy.
Results:
Clinical service domains returned consistently high satisfaction scores (staff competence: mean 17.89, SD 3.52;
empathy: mean 18.12, SD 3.27; treatment outcomes: mean 17.91, SD 4.02). Non-clinical domains scored substantially lower
(filing system efficiency: mean 12.81, SD 2.12; maintenance responsiveness: mean 12.50, SD 3.98). Staff professionalism was
the strongest correlate of overall satisfaction (r = 0.78, p < 0.01). K-means clustering identified two patient segments: Cluster
1 (uniformly high satisfaction) and Cluster 2, whose overall experience was disproportionately depressed by deficiencies in
administrative and infrastructural domains, despite clinical scores equivalent to Cluster 1.
Conclusions:
The study identifies a structural pattern termed service visibility bias, in which clinical interactions receive
disproportionate investment attention relative to operational systems, producing a pronounced satisfaction gap between
clinical and non-clinical domains. Targeted investment in administrative efficiency and facility infrastructure represents the
highest-leverage intervention for closing this gap. Multi-centre replication is required to establish the generalisability of
these findings across the Nigerian private specialist hospital sector.
Keywords :
Patient Satisfaction, Service Visibility Bias, Donabedian Framework, Private Specialist Hospital, K-Means Clustering, Healthcare Quality, Kano, Nigeria, LMIC Health Systems.