Authors : Ian S. Jugos; Mark Dustine A. Luangco; Kieth Lance C. Garcia; Andrelyn R. Andoy; Christal Mae L. Hernandez; Lomyna Y. Morre

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/459vkkkm

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4wvpy7tb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb094

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study, anchored on Tinto’s Student Integration Theory (1975), examined the factors influencing school orientation, students’ perception, and satisfaction at a Private Higher Education Institution. It evaluated key orientation components, specifically structure and organization, quality of information, and interaction among stakeholders. The study also measured students’ perception in terms of clarity of information, effectiveness of delivery, and engagement level, as well as their satisfaction based on usefulness, quality of experience, and willingness to recommend. A descriptive-correlational quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a researcher-made survey questionnaire administered to 100 BSBA students. Findings revealed that school orientation factors were rated high, indicating that the program was systematically planned, well-coordinated, and effectively implemented. Students expressed positive perceptions of the orientation, noting that the information provided was clear, well-delivered, and relevant to their academic transition. Satisfaction levels were similarly high, with students acknowledging the practicality of the content, the supportive environment created by facilitators, and the overall value of the orientation experience. Additionally, results showed a significant relationship between school orientation factors and both perception and satisfaction. This suggests that improved structure, high-quality information, and meaningful interaction contribute to more favourable student evaluations. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining organized, informative, and engaging orientation programs, as they play a vital role in enhancing student preparedness, fostering a sense of belonging, and supporting successful adjustment to college life. The study highlights the crucial role of well-executed orientation initiatives in promoting positive student experiences in higher education.

Keywords : School Orientation, School Orientation Factors, Students’ Perception, Satisfaction, Private Higher Education.

References :

1. Abdallah, Badr Saleh Al-Abdi, Maged Rfeqallah, Kasim, R., & Ali. (2024). Information quality and students’ academic performance: the mediating roles of perceived usefulness, entertainment and social media usage. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00329-2
2. Abdullah, S. I. N. W., Arokiyasamy, K., Goh, S. L., Culas, A. J., & Manaf, N. M. A. (2022). University students’ satisfaction and future outlook towards forced remote learning during a global pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00197-8s
3. Alammary, A. S. (2024). Blended learning delivery methods for a sustainable learning environment: A Delphi Study. Sustainability, 16( 3269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083269
4. Algones, C. J. L., Calizo, E. V., & Bauyot, M. M. (2024). Experiences of teachers teaching in far-flung areas of the Division of Davao Del Norte: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(6), 90–100. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.806212
5. Ali, M., Amir, H., & Ahmed, M. (2021). The role of university switching costs, perceived service quality, perceived university image and student satisfaction in shaping student loyalty. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.1975184
6. Alperin, M., Gaydos, L., & Phillips, J. (2020). The role of orientation programs to prepare students for online learning: A case study from an executive MPH program. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 6(4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920953375
7. Almeda, L. F., & Chua, E. N. (2023). Organizational dynamics and participative work culture in appraising school environment effectiveness. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 2(09). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i9n15
8. Alterkait, M. A., & Alduaij, M. Y. (2024). Impact of information quality on satisfaction with e-learning platforms: Moderating role of instructor and learner quality. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241233400
9. Alzahrani, L., & Seth, K. P. (2021). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction with continuous use of learning management systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10492-5
10. Asem, E. K., & Rajwa, B. (2022). Impact of combination of short-lecture and group-discussion on the learning of physiology by non-major undergraduates. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00022.2022
11. Balot, M. A., Jr, S., Furuc, J. A., & Richmond. (2023). Student perceptions and engagement: Basis for responsive student services during the pandemic. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8240393
12. Bell, K. (2021). Increasing undergraduate student satisfaction in Higher Education: The importance of relational pedagogy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2021.1985980
13. Bizimana, E., & Sibomana, A. (2024). Students' perceptions of learning environment and attitudinal changes in concept mapping-based biology classrooms. European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 11, 29-41. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (2024). Scirp.org.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3949700&utm_source=google.com
14. Cataraja, G. (2022). Interaction among stakeholders in a school setting. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i6.694
15. Creviston, K. A. (2022). The Impact of new student orientation on student academic success and degree completion at Chippewa valley technical college. Wisconsin.edu. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/84132
16. Datu, J. A. D., & Park, N. (2019). Perceived school kindness and academic engagement: The mediational roles of achievement goal orientations. School Psychology International, 40(5), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319854474
17. De Clercq, M., Michel, C., Remy, S., & Galand, B. (2019). Providing freshmen with a good 'starting-block'. Swiss Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000217
18. De Guzman, J., Remigilda, D., & Gallardo. (2025). International journal of innovative science and research technology to school climate of secondary schools in sta. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(2), 1947–1953. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14987684
19. Dugenio-Nadela, C., Cañeda, D. M., Tirol, S. L., Samillano, J. H., Pantuan, D. J. M., Piañar, J. C., Tinapay, A. O., Casas, H. M. S., Cometa, R. A., Conson, S. O., Urot, M. V., Ancot, J. M., Nadela, R. L., Dugenio-Terol, I., Baluyot, A. M., Pevida, K., Olivar, J. I., & Decena, E. (2023). Service quality and student’s satisfaction in higher education institution. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 11(4), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2023.114049
20. Flaherty, C. (2023). Survey: Students want choice in orientation sessions. Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/college-experience/2023/10/30/survey-students-want-choice-orientation-sessions
21. Frondozo, C. E., & Yang, L. (2023). Feedback orientation and learning-related academic emotions: An exploratory study in Filipino university students. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5571-8_4
22. Galindo-Illanes, M. K., Gallegos-Mardones, J. A., & Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. (2021). Explaining loyalty in higher education: A model and comparative analysis from the policy of gratuity, a case applied to chile. Sustainability, 13(19), 10781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910781
23. Hasan, M., & Hosen, Md. Z. (2020). University service quality. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i3.46
24. Huenul, A. C., Valenzuela, E. A., & Peranchiguay, S. S. (2020). Students' perception about orientation programs in Concepción Province, Chile. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v20i2.41652
25. Johannes Reichgelt, & Smith, T. C. (2024). The effect of course delivery mode on student performance and student satisfaction: A case study. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 872–884. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040050
26. Kholifah, N., Nurtanto, M., Kuspangaliyeva, K., Mutohhari, F., Masek, A., & Kassymova, G. (2022). Investigating the moderating effects of perceived usefulness on the student satisfaction: Evidence from Indonesian higher education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(11), 3910–3923. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i11.7372
27. King, D. A. (2023). Assessing the usefulness of a new Students’ orientation program at the University of Guyana. Asu.edu. https://keep.lib.asu.edu/items/190914?utm_source=google.com
28. Laureta, A. L. N., & Dioso, D. P. D. (2020). Satisfaction of students and parents on school services of catholic schools in Southern Antique. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2), 49–50. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.229
29. Le, T. T., Nguyen, H. P., & Pham, Q. H. (2021). Factors influencing student satisfaction with training services at the College of Commerce. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-04-2020-0032
30. Lerner Colucci, R. B., & Grebing, R. E. (2020). The impact of an online orientation program on student success at a community college. https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v27i1.2251
31. Liang, J. (2023). The relationship of teaching clarity and student academic motivation in online classes. Pupil; International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 7(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2023.71.4856
32. Li, X., & Zhu, W. (2022). System quality, information quality, satisfaction and acceptance of online learning platform among college students in the context of online learning and blended learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054691
33. Li Gao, H. (2020). Understanding the impact of administrative service quality on satisfaction and loyalty towards university students. Higher Education Research, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20200501.15
34. Lloyd-Lewis, B. L., Miller, D. J., & Krause, A. E. (2023). Against all odds: Students’ interest in, and perceived value of, research and non-research psychology subjects. Psychology Learning and Teaching/Psychology, Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257231222647
35. Mag-aso, J. S., Albiso, M. R., Condeza, K. B., Edaño, R. V., Evangelista, A. F., Lazaro, L. O., Lawrence, L., Gian, Jane, I., Sacil, R. J., Salcedo, C. A., Joy, K., & Marie, A. (2025). The influence of school climate and subjective well-being on students’ engagement. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(III), 1844–1855. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90300145
36. Mamba, M., Tamayao, A., Vecaldo, R., Marl Paat, F., Pagulayan, E., & Emmanuel Asuncion, J. (2021). Study orientation and college readiness among alternative learning system graduates in Northeastern Philippines. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.285.296
37. Mann, B. A. (2019). Retention principles for new student orientation programs. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v6i1.2482
38. Maslang, R. C., Dela Cruz, L. P., & Santos, M. G. (2021). Evaluating student services awareness and satisfaction in Philippine higher education institutions amid the pandemic. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.3860/pjem.v12i1.2021.04
39. Matriano, E. A., & Bueno, D. C. (2024, June 1). Evaluating student orientation programs: Exploring clarity, relevance, usefulness, and impact of PEOs and SLOs from students’ perspectives. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16147.49446
40. Melean Romero, R. A., Carhuancho Mendoza, I. M., Guerrero Bejarano, M. A., Ponce Yactayo, D. L., Saravia Ramos, G. del P., Nolazco Labajos, F. A., Muñoz Ccuro, F. E., & Bravo Chávez, O. J. (2024). Service quality, loyalty building and institutional image at a university in Lima, Peru using structural equations. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1365219
41. Mengesha, A. K., Ayele, H. S., Melshew Fenta Misker, & Alemante Tafese Beyna. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching–learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06105-7
42. Millano, G. D., & Callo, E. C. (2024). Awareness level of internal and external stakeholders’ participation in the implementation of sustainable school programs and projects: Input to effective stakeholders’ management plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(2), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.02.23
43. Miller, A., Johnson, R., & Roberts, K. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through improved orientation programs: A case study. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 58(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2020.1726357
44. Mohzana, M. (2024). The impact of the new student orientation program on the adaptation process and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v2i2.763
45. Mondal, H., Mondal, S., & Swain, S. M. (2024). Preference in powerpoint presentation among first-year medical students: A nationwide online cross-sectional survey. Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine, 7(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_178_23
46. Murugi, R. M., & Mugwe, M. (2023). Stakeholders’ involvement and school leadership for effective implementation of strategic planning. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 7(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.59765/fa59zan3
47. M. Nasir, M. K. (2020). The influence of social presence on students’ satisfaction toward online course. Open Praxis, 12(4), 485. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1141
48. Nadler, D. P., Miller, M. T., & Casebere, J. (2019). Student satisfaction with orientation. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v6i1.2480.
49. Özge Ceren ÇELİK, & Gülgün Bangir-Alpan. (2023). The impact of an effective communication course with enhanced student engagement on communication skills and emphatic tendency of preservice teachers. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.122.3
50. Sagario, A., Binondo, R.J.,Dalipe, A.,Gutierrez, R.J., & Batang, J.(2023) Learners level of satisfaction on school related factors and its effect on academic performance. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 4(4), 62–83. https://ijase.org
51. Schuster, M. T. (2019). Learning culture: First-year student transition, institutional culture, and the bubble of trial adulthood. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v26i2.2400
52. Tahir, I., Fatima, N., Tahir, I., & Fatima, N. (2023). The impact of student engagement, quality of student faculty relationship and student loyalty on quality of higher education: A systematic literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(2), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2314
53. Taja-on, E., Elven James Acal, & Jr, E. M. (2024). A student-centric evaluation of the awareness, acceptance, relevance, and dissemination of the student affairs and services VMGO in the framework of San Isidro College. 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14184006
54. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
55. Todea, S., Davidescu, A. A., Pop, N. Al., & Stamule, T. (2022). Determinants of student loyalty in higher education: A structural equation approach for the Bucharest university of economic studies, Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095527
56. Tondo, J., & Detecio, M. (2021). Satisfaction of senior high school graduates on senior high school tracks: Opportunities and challenges. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal (APHERJ), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.56278/apherj.v8i1.1694
57. Tundung Subali Patma, Ludfi Djajanto, Saniman Widodo, & Karisma Sri Rahayu. (2022). The Effect of information quality and experience quality on trust and its impact on customer loyalty. 260–268. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-026-8_30
58. Twum, F. O., & Peprah, W. K. (2020). The impact of service quality on students’ satisfaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i10/7923
59. Vebrina, D., & Marwan. (2020). The effect of using group discussion methods on the learning outcomes of economic paper working materials in Class XII of Angkola Barat 1 High School. Proceedings of the 4th Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.103
60. Verallo, J. T., & Quines, L. A. (2025). Change orientation, strategic planning, and teamwork: A structural equation model on the readiness for organizational change in public elementary schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i2.5835
61. Wan Mamat, W. H., Mohd Nazry, S. S., & Mohamad Shariff, N. (2022). Impact, effectiveness and satisfaction of e-learning among undergraduate students during pandemic covid-19. International Journal of Care Scholars, 5(3), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v5i3.222
62. Watts, J. (2019). Assessing an online student orientation: Impacts on retention, satisfaction, and student learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1607905
63. Wilson, C. A., Babcock, S. E., & Saklofske, D. H. (2019). Sinking or swimming in an academic pool: A study of resiliency and student success in first-year undergraduates. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i1.188220
64. Wismath, S., & Newberry, J. (2019). Mapping assets: High impact practices and the first year experience. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 7(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.4
65. Zheng, J. (2021). A functional review of research on clarity, immediacy, and credibility of teachers and their impacts on motivation and engagement of students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712419
66. Zou, X., & Yu, Z. (2022). Student perceptions of factors influencing engagement in online courses on tencent meeting. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijopcd.311442