Authors :
Fe T. Amatac
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yh4p26hs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct1374
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study investigated the significant differences in school heads’ leadership behavior when grouped according to their conflict management approaches, as well as the effect size of these approaches on leadership behavior. Utilizing a descriptive-comparative research design, the study surveyed 90 public school teachers using an adapted questionnaire. The findings revealed that school heads predominantly utilize collaborating and compromising approaches, and they consistently exhibit high levels of leadership behavior across personality, learning environment, and technology domains. A significant difference was found in leadership behavior based on conflict management styles, with a large effect size indicating that 93.4% of the variance in leadership behavior is explained by the conflict management approach used. The study concludes that the strategies school heads use to resolve conflicts substantially influence their overall leadership effectiveness.
References :
- Aganon, R. (2021). The leadership behavior and competence of public secondary school administrators in the Division of Cagayan: Basis for a compelling-based program. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 1(3), 15–42.
- Albert, I. O. (2024). New directions in the management of community conflicts in Nigeria: Insights from the activities of AAPW. In O. Otite & I. O. Albert (Eds.), Community Conflicts in Nigeria: Management, Resolution and Transformation. Spectrum Books Limited.
- Alimba, C. (2023). Conflict management styles: Historical evolution, perspectives and rationalisation.
- Al-Sibaie, E. Z., Alashwal, A. M., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Zolkafli, U. K. (2020). Determining the relationship between conflict factors and performance of international construction projects. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 21(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2014-0034
- American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. https://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics(1).pdf
- Ayub, N., AlQurashi, S. M., Al-Yafi, W. A., & Jehn, K. (2022). Personality traits and conflict management styles in predicting job performance and conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(5), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-12-2016-0105
- Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Euwema, M. C., & Ovadje, F. (2021). The relation between ethical leadership and workplace conflicts: The mediating role of employee resolution efficacy. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2037–2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638163
- Bang, A. H. (2021). The restorative and transformative power of the arts in conflict resolution. Journal of Transformative Education, 14, 355–376.
- Baptiste, M. (2020). No teacher left behind: The impact of principal leadership styles on teacher job satisfaction and student success. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 9(1).
- Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2021). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022913
- Basañes, R. A. (2020). Instructional leadership capacity of elementary school administrators.
- Beitler, L. A., Scherer, S., & Zapf, D. (2021). Interpersonal conflict at work: Age and emotional competence differences in conflict management. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(4), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386618808346
- Benoliel, B. (2024). What’s your conflict management style? Walden University. https://www.waldenu.edu/news-and-events/walden-news/2017/0530-whats-your-conflict-management-style
- Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2021). Research in education (11th ed.). Pearson.
- Best, S. G. (2021). Introduction to peace and conflict studies in West Africa. Spectrum Books.
- Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (2024). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Gulf Publishing Company.
- Blanchard, K., Carlos, J. P., & Randolph, A. (2021). The 3 keys to empowerment: Release the power within people for astonishing results (1st ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Bloomfield, D., & Reilly, B. (2023). The changing nature of conflict and conflict management.
- Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2021). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (7th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Burgos-Cienfuegos, R., Vasquez-Salgado, Y., Ruedas-Gracia, N., & Greenfield, P. M. (2020). Disparate cultural values and modes of conflict resolution in peer relations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315591343
- Chung, Y. W. (2020). The mediating effects of organizational conflict on the relationships between workplace ostracism with in-role behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-01-2014-0001
- Ciocon, S. (2023). Characteristics, leadership behavior and practices of school heads and its relationship to their office performance. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 6, 111–136. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.95
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Coleman, M., & Glover, D. (2020). Educational leadership and management: Developing insights and skills. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
- Connelly, L. M. (2023). Pilot studies. Medicine, Surgery and Nursing, 17(6), 411–412.
- Copley, R. D. (2023). Conflict management styles: A predictor of likability and perceived effectiveness among subordinates.
- Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2024). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 11–44.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2021). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, and promises. John Wiley & Sons.
- Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2023). Technology leadership for twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 124–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230310464648
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2020). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
- Gbadamosi, O., Baghestan, A. G., & Al-Mabrouk, K. (2024). Gender, age and nationality: Assessing their impact on conflict resolution styles. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-02-2011-0024
- Gonçalves, G., Reis, M., Sousa, C., Santos, J., Orgambídez-Ramos, A., & Scott, P. (2021). Cultural intelligence and conflict management styles. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(4), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2015-0923
- Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
- Gümüşeli, A. I., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2024). Globalization and conflict management in schools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 183–198.
- Hammed, A. (2020). Conflict sensitive journalism and reporting. Paper presented at the Conflict-Sensitive Communication and Reporting, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
- Hayat, A., Latif, A., Humayon, A. A., Ahmed, M., & Azeem, M. (2020). The mediating role of entrepreneurial leadership in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance of ICTs SMEs. Journal of Multidisciplinary Approaches in Science, 2(1)
This study investigated the significant differences in school heads’ leadership behavior when grouped according to their conflict management approaches, as well as the effect size of these approaches on leadership behavior. Utilizing a descriptive-comparative research design, the study surveyed 90 public school teachers using an adapted questionnaire. The findings revealed that school heads predominantly utilize collaborating and compromising approaches, and they consistently exhibit high levels of leadership behavior across personality, learning environment, and technology domains. A significant difference was found in leadership behavior based on conflict management styles, with a large effect size indicating that 93.4% of the variance in leadership behavior is explained by the conflict management approach used. The study concludes that the strategies school heads use to resolve conflicts substantially influence their overall leadership effectiveness.