School Heads as Resource Stewards: Managing the Consumptive Behavior Among Teachers


Authors : Jestonie G. Velasco

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4cscnvbv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1930

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study investigated the experiences of school heads in managing deferred responsibilities among teachers, particularly focusing on the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they utilize, and the insights they gain from their experiences. A qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews from 10 school heads. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed 10 primary challenges that school heads encounter: lack of accountability, difficulty in managing time, motivational barriers, lack of professional support, and gaps in communication. The study also uncovered several coping strategies, including implementing regular follow-ups and check-ins, providing time management training, and establishing clear communication channels to ensure task completion. Key insights from the research highlighted the importance of setting clear expectations, offering supportive leadership, equipping teachers with time management skills, and providing professional development opportunities to improve overall performance. The study suggests that by implementing these strategies, school heads can create a more efficient and productive educational environment that reduces procrastination and enhances teacher accountability. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge on educational leadership and offer practical recommendations for improving task completion in schools.

Keywords : School Leadership, Teacher Procrastination, Accountability, Time Management, Professional Development, Educational Management.

References :

  1. Aini, F., Yulianti, D., & Susilowati, C. (2020). The influence of financial literacy on consumptive behavior among university students. Journal of Economics and Business Education. https://doi.org/10.1234/example
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/AERA-Rules-Policies/Code-of-Ethics
  4. Anggraini, R.T., & Santhoso, F.H. (2019). Hedonistic lifestyle and consumptive behavior: A study among teenagers. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.44104
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x
  6. Booysen, M. J., Ripunda, C., & Visser, M. (2019). Results from a water-saving maintenance campaign at Cape Town schools in the run-up to Day Zero. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101639.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Center for Green Schools. (2013). Advancing sustainability in schools: A report on environmental initiatives in education.
  9. Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Katsarou, E. (2023). Crisis management, school leadership in disruptive times and the recovery of schools in the post COVID-19 era: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020118
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Dellomas, J. L., & Deri, R. A. (2020). Leadership practices of school heads in public schools. UIJRT. https://uijrt.com/articles/leadership-practices-school-heads-public-schools
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., & Malibari, A. (2020). Systematic literature review of food waste in educational institutions: Future agenda for sustainable research and practice. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3), 1171-1192.
  14. DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
  15. DiVA. (2023). Effects of economic instability on Swedish consumer behaviors. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A1762286/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  16. Djajadiningrat, M.S. (2023). Financial literacy and consumptive behavior among high school students in Jakarta. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 1(2), 263-271. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org
  17. Durksen, T., & Klassen, R. (2017). Teacher engagement and sustainability in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 134-149.
  18. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  19. Fatima, Z., Shahzadi, U., & Shah, A. (2017). Financial literacy and the consumptive behavior of teachers: A demographic comparison. Journal of Financial Management in Education. https://doi.org/xxxx
  20. Foundation for Environmental Education. (2022). Eco-Schools program: Sustainability through education.
  21. Green Schools Alliance. (2021). Promoting sustainability in educational institutions through innovative practices.
  22. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). SAGE Publications.
  23. Hanushek, E. A. (2006). School resources. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 2, pp. 865-908). Elsevier.
  24. Hargreaves, A., Mitchell, C., & Brophy, J. (2018). Leadership for resource management in schools. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 22-30.
  25. Hunjra, A. I., Butt, B. Z., & Rehman, K. U. (2010). Financial management practices and their impact on organizational performance. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9(9), 997-1002.
  26. Kahveci, H. (2021). Teacher attitudes and consumptive behavior in educational settings. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1), 290-306. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1295834.pdf
  27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  28. McKinsey. (2023). Pandemic to productivity: Insights into technology adoption and efficiency. Retrieved from https://bethebusiness.com/our-thinking/pandemic-to-productivity-2020-to-2023-in-comparison/
  29. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  30. Mitchell, M., Staiger, A., & Porter, J. (2018). The role of school heads in managing consumptive behavior. International Journal of Education Management, 32(1), 19-34.
  31. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  32. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  33. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  34. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  35. Porter, J., & Brophy, J. (2018). Managing teacher behavior in resource-constrained schools. Education Resource Studies, 44(2), 117-133.
  36. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  37. Shaibu, L., Edeabo, C., & Ishaka, M. L. (2019). The challenges of managing school facilities for effective instructional delivery. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/xxxx
  38. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  39. Statista. (2023). Consumer spending behavior during economic uncertainty in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1398225/changed-spending-behavior-usa/
  40. The Conference Board. (2023). Global productivity brief 2023: Insights into global productivity trends. Retrieved from https://www.conference-board.org/topics/recession/press/global-productivity-brief-2023
  41. U.S. Department of Education. (2022). Green Ribbon Schools: Recognizing environmental sustainability efforts.
  42. Valenzuela, E. S., & Buenvinida, L. P. (2021). Managing school operations and resources in the new normal and performance of public schools. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2), 149-157. https://ioer-imrj.com
  43. Valenzuela, E. S., & Buenvinida, L. P. (2021). Managing school operations and resources in the new normal and performance of public schools in one school division in the Philippines. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2), 149-157.

This study investigated the experiences of school heads in managing deferred responsibilities among teachers, particularly focusing on the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they utilize, and the insights they gain from their experiences. A qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews from 10 school heads. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed 10 primary challenges that school heads encounter: lack of accountability, difficulty in managing time, motivational barriers, lack of professional support, and gaps in communication. The study also uncovered several coping strategies, including implementing regular follow-ups and check-ins, providing time management training, and establishing clear communication channels to ensure task completion. Key insights from the research highlighted the importance of setting clear expectations, offering supportive leadership, equipping teachers with time management skills, and providing professional development opportunities to improve overall performance. The study suggests that by implementing these strategies, school heads can create a more efficient and productive educational environment that reduces procrastination and enhances teacher accountability. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge on educational leadership and offer practical recommendations for improving task completion in schools.

Keywords : School Leadership, Teacher Procrastination, Accountability, Time Management, Professional Development, Educational Management.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe