Authors : M. Kiranamirtha; Yothi Gupta

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/32stzffs

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct1618

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This research paper explores the connection between urban form, pedestrians’ movement, diversification of the land use, the public realm and human activity on Church Street and MG Road in Bengaluru’s Central Business District. The study focuses on the impact of street connectivity, commercial use of the area, the quality of public realm, and place identity on urban life. The methodology of the research includes theoretical research (Kevin lynch principles,), spatial mapping, on-site investigation (Church Street and MG Road), users study, and application of the urban design principles of New Urbanism as guidelines for identifying problems and challenges in the present situation. 4 Literature review and 4 case studies and practical knowledge on walkability, mixed use, connectivity, sustainability, and lively public realm. According to the findings, multifocal and mixed-use urbanity will be the key concept of the project as it includes diversification of activities, variety of functions and active life 24 hours per day. The zoning system reflects this idea by designing three parcels with different functions. In the end, this research aims to provide a human-centric approach to urban design that will build a stronger connection between the network of streets and public activities, thus creating a more accessible, vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable urban realm.

Keywords : Urban Design, Connected Streets, Church Street, MG Road, Urban Form, Pedestrian Connectivity, Walkability, MixedUse Development, Multifocal Urbanity, Public Realm, Place Identity, New Urbanism, Human-Centred Design, Urban Vitality, Sustainable Urban Development.

References :

1. 1. Frago, L., & Morcuende, A. (2024). Urban planning paradoxes and sociospatial fragmentation: The Superblock Barcelona case (2016–2023). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 48(6), 1055-1078. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-2427.13273
   2. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment, 2(3), 199-219. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1361920997000096
   3. Congress for the New Urbanism. (1996). The charter of the New Urbanism. In The City Reader (pp. 413-416). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429261732-49/charter-new-urbanism
   4. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American planning association, 76(3), 265-294. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944361003766766
   5. Gehl, J. (2012). Life between buildings: using public space. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WsrNEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=Gehl,+J.+(2011).+Life+between+buildings:+Using+public+space+(J.+Koch,+Trans.).+Island+Press.+(Original+work+published+1971)&ots=oZ3qenuUmH&sig=2E3chReglrLfQ795fDEPI6HCnik&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
   6. Debates, S. P. (2007). Official Report. https://kla.kar.nic.in/council/houseproceedings/130/debates02022016.pdf
   7. Ganju, M. N. A. (2016, September 20). Urban Renewal by Citizens: A case study of an urbanizing village on the outskirts of Delhi – Aya Nagar. Architecture Live https://architecture.live/urbanising-village-outskirts-of-delhi-aya-nagar-case-study-m-n-ashish-ganju/
   8. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life or Grate American Cities. https://academia-edu-documents.ada3b51d29be5ae5c31d26340608fd48.r2.cloudflarestorage.com/58736355/5816-15512-1-PB20190328-113674-17px9eh-libre.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DJane_Jacobs_contradictions_and_tensions.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=62bb68dcc7da7de029ac4fdac624cee9%2F20261015%2Fauto%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20261015T191834Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=d55e9b9ed5aea7c6473926f536a88f312fe5ef925825fe971854f63ccf6fd16e
   9. Lynch, K. (2013). “The Image of the Environment” and “The City Image and Its Elements”: From The Image of the City (1960). In The urban design reader (pp. 125-138). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203094235-16/image-environment-city-image-elements-kevin-lynch
   10. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart cities, 4(1), 93-111. https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/4/1/6?ref=growingupalienated.com
   11. VA Group. (n.d.). Redevelopment of Church Street, Bengaluru. https://www.vagroup.com/projects/redevelopment-of-church-street-bengaluru/
   12. Dhingra, M., Singh, M. K., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2016). Rapid assessment tool for traditional Indian neighbourhoods: A case study of Alwar Walled City in Rajasthan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 364-382. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210670716301251
   13. Nello-Deakin, S. (2024). “Winner” versus “loser” streets? Pedestrianization and intra-neighborhood equity. Journal of Urban Mobility, 5, 100074. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000049
   14. Vagale, U. K. (2004). Bangalore-future trends in public open space usage. Case study: Mahatma Gandhi Road, Bangalore (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/items/60539020-5b1d-4da1-80fc-e212f7d73e4d
   15. Metwally, W. M. (2026). Streetscapes and street livability: Advancing sustainable and human-centered urban environments. Sustainability, 18(2), 667. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/667
   16. Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 33(5), 705-725. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b32045
   17. Heihati azar, A. A., Ezatpanah, B. & Hosseinzadeh Dalir, K. (2024). Evaluation of smart sustainable urban regeneration in the central context of Tabriz city. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal, 13(4), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2023.375357.3603
   18. Conway, L., & Hess, P. M. (2009). The Development of a Walkability Index: Application. https://www.ipenproject.org/documents/publications_docs/Frank%20et%20al%20published%20NQLS%20walkability%20paper.pdf
   19. Bangalore Development Authority. (2007). Revised master plan 2015: Volume III—Zoning of land use and regulations. https://data.opencity.in/dataset/bda-revised-master-plan-2015
   20. Alex, E. C., Ramesh, K. V., & Sridevi, H. (2017). Quantification and understanding the observed changes in land cover patterns in Bangalore. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 597-603. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sridevi-Hari/publication/316471841_Quantification_and_understanding_the_observed_changes_in_land_cover_patterns_in_Bangalore/links/5900208d0f7e9bcf65456319/Quantification-and-understanding-the-observed-changes-in-land-cover-patterns-in-Bangalore.pdf