Authors : Daniel Msuega Chia; Christopher Ishiekwen Abeabe; Williams Terkaa; Secivir Songo; Hilemshima Teryima; Silas Orvave Akumba

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ytd5zhax

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yw37mv4s

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14554782

Abstract : The gold standard in clinical diagnostic imaging is to place a radiopaque anatomical side marker (ASM) prior to exposure; nonetheless, mistakes and errors can be made, resulting in wrong-side surgery, misdiagnoses and medico-legal problems. The goal of computed radiography (CR) with electronic and post- processing image annotation capabilities is to enhance diagnostic imaging practice and reduce these errors. We aim to assess the local practice of image annotation in clinical diagnostic imaging at our center, pre- and post- CR installation and revalidate the clinical importance of ASMs.This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted between July 2023 to July 2024 at Benue State University Teaching Hospital (BSUTH), Makurdi's radiology department. Data was collected from two departmental sources: physical archive from 2012-2020 and digital archive from 2021-2024, respectively, containing images created before and after CR installation. The data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS version 23 software, with statistical significance determined using a p<0.05 value. Data distribution was displayed using tables, figures, and percentages. The audit recorded no significant difference in the mean age of the patients, which was 40.2years ±18.9 and 41.2years±18.4 respectively, before and after CR installation. Post-CR installation at BSUTH, clinical practice significantly changed regarding ASM use (p=0.000-0.044), with 225(75.0%) and 162(54.0%) ASMs placed in the primary radiation beam, while only 22(3.7%) ASMs obstructed essential anatomy. The incidence of missing markers was generally low 1(0.2%), which is good practice. Prior to CR installation, 52 (17.3%) post-processed and 247 (82.3%) lead markers were used respectively for radiographic image annotation, whereas 300 (100%) digital ASMs were employed exclusively after CR installation, demonstrating an increasing use of technology in radiology. BSUTH implemented a managerial strategy, increasing personnel recruitment 33(45.2%) and employing seven Xray technicians despite a decrease in experienced radiographers. The study comes to the conclusion that, despite not meeting the audit criteria of 100%, the pre- and post-CR installation audit at BSUTH showed a significant shift in anatomical side marker practice, with few missing markers and over 50% compliance with standard ASM placement in the primary radiation beam. Since ASMs are essential for quality control and accurate radiographic identification, their absence on images can lead to patient safety issues, misdiagnoses, wrong-site surgeries, and medico-legal penalties.

Keywords : Anatomical Side Markers, Audit, Clinical Importance, Computed Radiography, Local Practice.

References :

1. Xray Markers – Origins, proper use, and examples! Available at:   https://theradiologictechnologist.com/ xray-markers-radiology-markers.Accessed on   28-04-23 at18:51PM.
2. Bwanga O, Kashweka H, Chanda E, Nyerenda S, Bwalya M. Anatomical Side Marker Use in Digital Radiography at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) of Lusaka, Zambia. EAS J Radiol Imaging Technol. 2023;5(1):11-18
3. Attard S, Couto JG, MacKay S, Zarb F. Anatomic Site Markers: Evaluation of Their Use among Maltese Radiographers. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences.2017;  48(1)30-38.
4. Titley AG, Cosson P. Radiographer use of anatomical side markers and the latent conditions affecting their use in practice. Radiography 2014; 20:42-47.
5. Davis M, Reeves P. Maintaining the chain of evidence in child abuse cases. J Diag Rad Imaging. 2004;5(2):61–68
6. Freeman C.  Radiography – the child and the law: the roles and responsibilities of the radiographer,1st ed., Barker & Hodes, 2004, pp. 10-12.
7. Dyer O. Surgeon is struck off for failing to mention disciplinary action. BMJ. 2005; 330:274
8. Devine JG. Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right (Kidney) Available at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/two-wrongs-dont-make-right-kidney. Accessed 28-04-23 at 17:24PM.
9. Finnbogason T, Bremmer S, Ringertz H. Side markings of the neonatal chest x-ray: two legal cases on pneumothorax side mix up. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12:938-941.
10. Brasel K, Layde P, Hargarten S. Evaluation of error in medicine: application of a public health model. Acad Emer Med.2000; 7:1298–1302
11. Carmichael, J., Moores, B. & Maccia, C. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images—Publications Office of the EU. (2000). Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/ publication-detail/. Accessed :28-04-23 at 17:58PM
12. Quinsten AS,  Umutlu L,  Forsting   M,  Nassenstein K, Demircioğlu A. Determining the anatomical site in knee radiographs using deep learning. Scientifc Reports. 2022; 12:3995
13. Tugwell, J. & Maddison, A. Radiographic markers—A reservoir for bacteria? Radiography 2011;17: 115–120
14. Hayre CM, Blackman S, Eyden A, Carlton K. The use of digital side markers (DSMs) and cropping in digital radiography. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2019; 50:234–242.
15. Platt JM, Strudwick RM. The application of anatomical side markers during abdominal and IVU examinations: An investigation of practice prior to and post-installation of computed radiography (CR). Radiography 2009;15: 292–299.
16. Adejoh T, Elugwu CH, Sidi M, Ezugwu EE, Asogwa CO, Okeji MC.An audit of radiographers’ practice of left-right image annotation in film-screen radiography and after installation of computed radiography in a tertiary hospital in Africa. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.2020; 51(253):1-7
17. Adejoh T, Onwuzu SW, Nkubli FB, Ikegwuonu N.Radiation Field Preference for Radiographic Anatomical Markers by Radiographers in a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Open Journal of Radiology. 2014; 4: 275-278.
18. Barry K, Kumar S, Linke R, Dawes E.A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016; 63:148–154.
19. Chung L, Kumar S, Oldfield J, Phillips M, Stratfold M.A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a pediatric medical imaging department: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. PLoS ONE.2020; 15(11):1-15
20. Makurdi. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Makurdi. Accessed :28-04-23 at 17:58PM
21. Casey D, Trisha E. J, Tais G.O, Raphael A.O, Livia Y, Sally A L et al. Women’s Health Information Survey: Common Health Concerns and Trusted Sources of Health Information Among Different Populations of Female Patients. Women’s Health Reports. 2021; 2(1):173-181
22. Meinberg, E, G., & Stern, P. J. (2003). Incidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85(2), 193-197.
23. Khosa H, Thomas C., Ramesh, N.  Revalidating the importance of anatomical side markers and annotations on radiographic Images. European Congress of Radiology. Available at:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/ ecr2015/C2464. Accessed :05-10-24 at 13:15PM.