Authors :
Athira Sajeev
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2nkhrzhj
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/44twzd8h
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr429
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The COVID-19 pandemic has redefined the outlines of national and global security, situating health emergencies
as a crux within the domain of non-traditional security threats. For India, the pandemic examined the persistence of its
healthcare framework and revealed the complicated linkages between human well-being and national governance under the
ambit of human security. Unlike traditional security threats that emanate from military or political strife, pandemics appear
as intangible, cross-border challenges that undermine societies from within. The outbreak drastically affected India’s socioeconomic fabric. It also put down peculiar trauma on public health institutions and accentuated drawbacks in health
infrastructure, policy coordination, and crisis management.
Pandemic as a non-traditional threat, featured that security can no longer be confined to territorial defence but must
encompass the protection of human lives, livelihoods, and dignity. The concept of human security, which prioritizes human
well-being, becomes vital in understanding India’s vulnerabilities and preparedness. The crisis underlines the need for an
integrated health emergency policy within the broader framework of national security. Strengthening public health
governance, fostering inter-governmental cooperation, and investing in research and technology are essential to building a
resilient security architecture.
Furthermore, India’s pandemic experience highlights the significance of global cooperation, as no nation can tackle
such crises in isolation. Thus, pandemics challenge India to rethink its conventional security paradigm and need to adopt a
comprehensive approach where health is recognized as a vital pillar of security. Addressing pandemics as non-traditional
security challenges requires not only institutional reforms but also a shift in policy mindset from reactive containment to
proactive preparedness rooted in the principles of human security and sustainable governance.
Keywords :
Non-Traditional Security, Pandemic, COVID-19, Human Security, Health Security, Public Health, Health Emergencies.
References :
- Acharya, A. (2001). Human security: East versus West. International Journal, 56(3), 442–460.
- Acharya, A. (2020). The end of American world order (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
- Agarwal, A., & Bhuyan, A. (2021). Equity and access in India’s COVID-19 vaccination programme. The Lancet, 397(10283), 1129–1131.
- Banerjee, D., & Rao, T. S. (2020). Psychology of misinformation and the media: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 36(5), 131–137.
- Barry, J. M. (2004). The great influenza: The story of the deadliest pandemic in history. Viking.
- Baru, R. (2021). Healthcare systems and COVID-19 in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(8), 13–16.
- Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Caballero-Anthony, M. (2016). An introduction to non-traditional security studies: A transnational approach. Sage Publications.
- Central Pollution Control Board. (2020). Guidelines for handling COVID-19 waste. Government of India.
- Chen, L. C., & Narasimhan, V. (2003). Human security and global health. Journal of Human Development, 4(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000087607
- Dreze, J., & Somanchi, A. (2021). COVID-19 and India’s social security measures. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(10), 12–15.
- Elbe, S. (2010). Security and global health: Toward the medicalization of insecurity. Polity Press.
- Elbe, S. (2018). Pandemics, pills, and politics: Governing global health security. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000290
- Fidler, D. P. (2010). The challenges of global health governance. Council on Foreign Relations Working Paper.
- Fidler, D. P. (2020). COVID-19 and global health security. Journal of International Affairs, 73(2), 1–10.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Fund for Agricultural Development, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Food Programme, & World Health Organization. (2020). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020. FAO.
- International Labour Organization. (2020). ILO monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work (3rd ed.). ILO.
- Kickbusch, I., Leung, G. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Matsoso, M. P., Ihekweazu, C., & Abbasi, K. (2021). Covid-19: How a virus is turning the world upside down. BMJ, 369, m1336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1336
- Kundu, A., & Bhowmik, S. (2020). COVID-19 and migrant workers in India: A crisis of livelihood and dignity. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00279-9
- McInnes, C., & Lee, K. (2006). Health, security and foreign policy. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006965
- McNeill, W. H. (1976). Plagues and peoples. Anchor Books.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2020). COVID-19 India: Government response and containment strategies. Government of India.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2021). Annual report 2020–21. Government of India.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2021). National COVID-19 vaccination programme operational guidelines. Government of India.
- Moon, S., Rottingen, J. A., & Frenk, J. (2020). Global public goods for health: Weaknesses and opportunities in the global health system. The Lancet, 395(10224), 192–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32545-9
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2020). COVID-19 and human rights: We are all in this together. United Nations.
- Roy, D., Tripathy, S., Kar, S. K., Sharma, N., Verma, S. K., & Kaushal, V. (2020). Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety, and perceived mental healthcare need in the Indian population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 102083.
- Snowden, F. M. (2019). Epidemics and society: From the Black Death to the present. Yale University Press.
- Srivastava, R. (2020). Understanding circular migration in India. Institute for Human Development Working Paper.
- Ullman, R. H. (1983). Redefining security. International Security, 8(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489
- UN Women. (2020). The shadow pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19. UN Women.
- United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. Oxford University Press.
- United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development perspectives: COVID-19 and human security. UNDP.
- United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier-Human development and the Anthropocene. UNDP.
- Walt, S. M. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600471
- World Bank. (2021). India development update: Navigating the recovery. World Bank.
- World Health Organization. (2020). COVID-19 strategy update. WHO.
- World Health Organization. (2020). WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. WHO.
- World Health Organization. (2021). COVID-19 strategic preparedness and response plan. WHO.
- World Health Organization. (2021). Global health security and COVID-19 response. WHO.
- World Health Organization. (2021). Strengthening preparedness for health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19. WHO.
The COVID-19 pandemic has redefined the outlines of national and global security, situating health emergencies
as a crux within the domain of non-traditional security threats. For India, the pandemic examined the persistence of its
healthcare framework and revealed the complicated linkages between human well-being and national governance under the
ambit of human security. Unlike traditional security threats that emanate from military or political strife, pandemics appear
as intangible, cross-border challenges that undermine societies from within. The outbreak drastically affected India’s socioeconomic fabric. It also put down peculiar trauma on public health institutions and accentuated drawbacks in health
infrastructure, policy coordination, and crisis management.
Pandemic as a non-traditional threat, featured that security can no longer be confined to territorial defence but must
encompass the protection of human lives, livelihoods, and dignity. The concept of human security, which prioritizes human
well-being, becomes vital in understanding India’s vulnerabilities and preparedness. The crisis underlines the need for an
integrated health emergency policy within the broader framework of national security. Strengthening public health
governance, fostering inter-governmental cooperation, and investing in research and technology are essential to building a
resilient security architecture.
Furthermore, India’s pandemic experience highlights the significance of global cooperation, as no nation can tackle
such crises in isolation. Thus, pandemics challenge India to rethink its conventional security paradigm and need to adopt a
comprehensive approach where health is recognized as a vital pillar of security. Addressing pandemics as non-traditional
security challenges requires not only institutional reforms but also a shift in policy mindset from reactive containment to
proactive preparedness rooted in the principles of human security and sustainable governance.
Keywords :
Non-Traditional Security, Pandemic, COVID-19, Human Security, Health Security, Public Health, Health Emergencies.