Authors :
Jonathan David Nelson
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/57echaeh
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1409
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This thesis critically examines the limitations of traditional accreditation frameworks in global higher education
and argues for the recognition and validation of informal universities as essential components of a pluralistic and inclusive
educational ecosystem. It also emphasizes the importance of controversy and epistemic diversity in higher education to
avoid intellectual stagnation and social exclusion.
References :
- Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. LSRC.
- Daniel, J. (2011). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education.
- Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2018). Digital technologies and the challenges of online education. Higher Education Policy, 31(1), 3–17.
- hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. Levy, D. C. (2010). The market for private higher education. Globalization and Education, 10(2), 197–221.
- Nimako, S. G., & Bond, K. (2012). Informal education and social transformation in Africa.
- Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 60–67.
- OECD. (2021). Recognition of prior learning. OECD Publishing. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
- Walsh, C. (2010). Development as Buen Vivir: Indigenous aspirations and the challenges of globalization. Development, 54(4), 447–453.
This thesis critically examines the limitations of traditional accreditation frameworks in global higher education
and argues for the recognition and validation of informal universities as essential components of a pluralistic and inclusive
educational ecosystem. It also emphasizes the importance of controversy and epistemic diversity in higher education to
avoid intellectual stagnation and social exclusion.