Authors :
Arnab Sen; Debasish Mandal; Tanoy Dewanjee
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5es3e2zn
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/z456xz4t
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1417
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This investigation employed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to analyze the complex turbulent characteristics
resulting from a high-speed jet transversely injected into a fully developed pipe flow. This flow configuration, known as Jet-in-
Cross-Flow (JICF), holds significant importance across various aerospace systems, including thrust vector control, advanced
mixing in propulsion systems, and thermal management in gas turbines. A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model,
specifically the standard $k-\epsilon$ closure, was implemented using ANSYS FLUENT 14.0 software to simulate the flow of
incompressible water in a 1-meter diameter pipe with a 5-centimeter injection nozzle.1 The study systematically varied the jet
and pipe inlet velocities to generate a range of momentum flux ratios, allowing for the quantitative analysis of localized velocity
profiles, turbulent kinetic energy ($k$), turbulent intensity ($I$), and turbulent dissipation rate ($\epsilon$). The results
demonstrate that increasing the momentum flux ratio leads to pronounced flow deflection, the formation of large recirculation
zones, and a subsequent significant increase in both $k$ and $I$ due to intense shear layer generation. Conversely, the analysis
of $\epsilon$ profiles suggests limitations within the standard $k-\epsilon$ model’s closure coefficients when modeling
anisotropic turbulence and localized dissipation phenomena inherent to JICF. The findings provide critical insights into the
dynamic interplay between momentum injection and turbulence generation in confined geometries, offering foundational data
for initial design phases of relevant aerospace components.
Keywords :
Computational Fluid Dynamics, Jet-in-Cross-Flow, Turbulent Kinetic Energy, Pipe Flow, RANS Modeling, Aerospace Mixing.1
References :
[1]. Taylor J (1984) Mathematically modelled airflow through sampling pipes. J. Fire Prot. Eng.
[2]. Cole L (1999) Disturbances to pipe flow regimes by jet induction. Fire Safety J.
[3]. Bejan A (1994) Convective heat transfer coefficient. John Wiley & Sons, New York
[4]. Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S, Thevenet D, Nourry C, Nottin S, Bosquet L (2009) Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children. Eur J Appl Physiol 105:731-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0955-8
[5]. Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2000) Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001090000086
[6]. South J, Blass B (2001) The future of modern genomics. Blackwell, London
[7]. Brown B, Aaron M (2001) The politics of nature. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 230-257
[8]. Cartwright J (2007) Big stars have weather too. IOP Publishing PhysicsWeb. http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/11/6/16/1. Accessed 26 June 2007
[9]. Turbulence Project ( Ready For Submission )=9-1-2014 (2).docx
[10]. Aerospace Systems | Research Communities by Springer Nature, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://communities.springernature.com/badges/aerospace-systems
[11]. Aerospace | Aims & Scope - MDPI, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/aerospace/about
[12]. Journal Scopes and Content | AIAA, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://aiaa.org/publications/journals/journal-scopes-and-content/
[13]. Mathematical Modeling of Turbulent Flows Using Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics - Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.metall-mater-eng.com/index.php/home/article/download/1311/698
[14]. Influence of Common Modeling Choices for High-Speed Transverse Jet-Interaction Simulations | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265250976_Influence_of_Common_Modeling_Choices_for_High-Speed_Transverse_Jet-Interaction_Simulations
[15]. Improvement of Standard K-Epsilon Turbulence Model for Round Free Jets by Adjusting Closure Coefficients | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378001241_Improvement_of_Standard_K-Epsilon_Turbulence_Model_for_Round_Free_Jets_by_Adjusting_Closure_Coefficients
[16]. Turbulence model study for aerodynamic analysis of the leading edge tubercle wing for low Reynolds number flows - NIH, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11176843/
[17]. Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), accessed on November 13, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970017828
[18]. Best practice guidelines (Chapter 7) - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/computational-fluid-dynamics-for-engineers/best-practice-guidelines/04FA8B0C0CFBBC6D2FF863AABBF28942
[19]. Grid independence studies applied to a field‐scale computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model using the detached eddy simulation - the NOAA Institutional Repository, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/70202/noaa_70202_DS1.pdf
[20]. Computational Fluid Dynamics Best Practice Guidelines for Dry Cask Applications - Nuclear Regulatory Commission, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1228/ML12286A301.pdf
[21]. New time scale based k-epsilon model for near-wall turbulence, accessed on November 13, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930057912
This investigation employed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to analyze the complex turbulent characteristics
resulting from a high-speed jet transversely injected into a fully developed pipe flow. This flow configuration, known as Jet-in-
Cross-Flow (JICF), holds significant importance across various aerospace systems, including thrust vector control, advanced
mixing in propulsion systems, and thermal management in gas turbines. A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model,
specifically the standard $k-\epsilon$ closure, was implemented using ANSYS FLUENT 14.0 software to simulate the flow of
incompressible water in a 1-meter diameter pipe with a 5-centimeter injection nozzle.1 The study systematically varied the jet
and pipe inlet velocities to generate a range of momentum flux ratios, allowing for the quantitative analysis of localized velocity
profiles, turbulent kinetic energy ($k$), turbulent intensity ($I$), and turbulent dissipation rate ($\epsilon$). The results
demonstrate that increasing the momentum flux ratio leads to pronounced flow deflection, the formation of large recirculation
zones, and a subsequent significant increase in both $k$ and $I$ due to intense shear layer generation. Conversely, the analysis
of $\epsilon$ profiles suggests limitations within the standard $k-\epsilon$ model’s closure coefficients when modeling
anisotropic turbulence and localized dissipation phenomena inherent to JICF. The findings provide critical insights into the
dynamic interplay between momentum injection and turbulence generation in confined geometries, offering foundational data
for initial design phases of relevant aerospace components.