Authors : Arnav Angarkar

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2wxpntu6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun909

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This paper presents our comprehensive understanding of quantum error correction (QEC) through a systematic exploration from fundamental quantum phenomena to advanced error correction schemes. Beginning with quantum entanglement and Bell states, we demonstrate how these foundational concepts enable quantum telepor-tation and ultimately lead to sophisticated error correction protocols. Our analy- sis covers the three fundamental types of quantum errors—bit-flip, phase-flip, and combined errors—and examines three major error correction approaches: the 3- qubit repetition code, Shor’sinnovative 9- qubit code, and topological surface codes. Through detailed mathematical derivations and comparative analysis, we reveal how quantum mechanics’ unique properties, initially seen as obstacles, become powerful resources for protecting quantum information. Our investigation shows that surface codes, with their high error threshold and hardware compatibility, represent the most promising path toward practical fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Keywords : Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Entanglement, Bell States, Quantum Teleportation, Shor Code, Surface Codes, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Com-Putting.

References :

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Standard textbook reference for Bell states, quantum teleportation, and quantum error correction.
2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Physical Review, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 777, 1935.
3. J. S. Bell, “On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox,” Physics Physique Fizika, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 1964. Original work on Bell’s theorem, fundamental to under- standing entanglement.
4. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein–podolsky– rosen channels,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 13, pp. 1895–1899, 1993. Foun- dational paper introducing the quantum teleportation protocol.
5. P. W. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,” Phys- ical Review A, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. R2493–R2496, 1995. Original proposal of the Shor code.
6. A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation,” Physical Review A, vol. 86, no. 3, p. 032324, 2012. Comprehensive study on surface codes and their threshold.
7. B. M. Terhal, “Quantum error correction for quantum memories,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 87, no. 2, p. 307, 2015.
8. J. Preskill, “Lecture notes for physics 229: Quantum information and computation,” 1998. Excellent foundational resource on Shor code and fault-tolerant quantum computing.
9. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 25, p. 1804, 1982.
10. A. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of Physics, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. 2–30, 2003.
11. D. Gottesman, “Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/9705052, 1997. Key paper on the formalism of stabilizer codes used in QEC.
12. G. Q. AI, “Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit,”Nature, vol. 614, no. 7949, pp. 676–681, 2023.
13. A. M. Steane, “Error correcting codes in quantum theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 5, p. 793, 1996.