Authors : Appiah, Mark Kubi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdzzwcen

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2s3fzsnn

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan074

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Thermally modified wood processing generates a spectrum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and potential toxic elements (PTEs) whose concentrations and toxicological relevance vary with temperature, product phase, and exposure pathway. This review synthesizes quantitative data from low- and high-temperature processing conditions to evaluate human health and environmental risks using standardized screening-level assessment metrics, including chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), hazard index (HI), and incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR). Across assessed matrices, low-temperature residues predominantly contain low-molecular-weight PAHs such as naphthalene and phenanthrene, elevating exposure potential without strong carcinogenic potency, whereas high-temperature conditions favor formation and enrichment of high-molecular-weight PAHs, particularly benzo[a]pyrene, which disproportionately drives cancer risk even at trace concentrations. PTEs, including arsenic, cadmium, and lead, exhibit pathway-dependent risk profiles, with aqueous leachate scenarios producing extreme HQ and ILCR values that exceed conventional screening thresholds by several orders of magnitude. In all cases, children present a higher risk than adults due to greater intake-to- body-weight ratios, reinforcing the need for receptor-specific evaluation. The findings indicate that thermal modification does not inherently mitigate contaminant risks; instead, certain operational ranges can amplify hazard potential by concentrating pollutants into more mobile, bioavailable, and regulatory-significant forms. These results emphasize the necessity of pathway-specific risk assessment, residue characterization, and post-processing management to avoid unintended public health impacts. The review concludes with recommendations for temperature optimization, leachability controls, and regulatory oversight to support safer industrial implementation and inform future research priorities.

Keywords : Thermally Modified Wood; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); Potential Toxic Elements (PTEs); Benzo[a]Pyrene; Arsenic; Cadmium; Lead; Biochar; Ash Leachate; Exposure Pathways; Soil Ingestion; Drinking-Water Ingestion; Chronic Daily Intake (CDI); Hazard Quotient (HQ); Hazard Index (HI); Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR); Mixture Toxicity; Pathway-Specific Risk Assessment; Environmental Contamination; Human Health Risk Characterization.

References :

1. Abdel-Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2016). A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 25(1), 107–123.
2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2019). Toxicological profile for cadmium. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2020). Toxicological profile for arsenic. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2020). Toxicological profile for arsenic. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2022). Toxicological profile for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6. Alharbi, O. M. L., Khattab, R. A., & Ali, I. (2023). Health and environmental effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 35(1), 102388.
7. Alloway, B. J. (2013). Heavy metals in soils: Trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability (3rd ed.) . Springer Science & Business Media.
8. Altarawneh, M., & Robinson, D. K. (2024). Mechanistic pathways in the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.
9. Boström, C. E., Gerde, P., Hanberg, A., Jernström, B., Johansson, C., Kyrklund, T., Rannug, A., Sjöberg, M., Stenberg, K., & Victorin, K. (2002). Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(suppl 3), 451–488.
10. Brischke, C., & Militz, H. (2020). Wood protection and preservation. In Springer Handbook of Wood Science and Technology (pp. 825–886). Springer, Cham.
11. Buss, W., Graham, M. C., MacKinnon, G., & Mašek, O. (2022). Strategies for optimizing biochar for environmental and agricultural applications. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.
12. Collard, F. X., & Blin, J. (2014). A review on pyrolysis of biomass for prediction in chemical characteristics of bio-oil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 594–618.
13. Duman, G., Okutucu, C., Ucar, S., Stahl, R., & Yanik, J. (2020). The slow pyrolysis of wood and its potential as a fuel. Renewable Energy.
14. Esteves, B. M., & Pereira, H. M. (2009). Wood modification by heat treatment: A review. BioResources, 4(1), 370–404.
15. Fernando, S., Liyanaarachchi, S., Gunawardana, B., & Jayawardana, J. M. C. K. (2024). Advances in the risk characterization of PAH mixtures: A review of toxicological interactions and assessment methodologies. Environmental Pollution, 341, 122904.
16. Grafmüller, J., Martin, J. G., & Dahmen, N. (2022). Catalytic effects of minerals on biomass pyrolysis: A review of the role of inorganic components. Fuel, 310, 122457.
17. Grey, M., & Sohi, S. P. (2019). Constraints to the application of biochar to arable land. Biochar, 1, 223–233.
18. Hill, C. A. (2006). Wood modification: Chemical, thermal and other processes. John Wiley & Sons.
19. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2010). Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures (IARC Monographs Vol. 92). World Health Organization.
20. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2010). Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 92.
21. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2012). Arsenic and arsenic compounds (IARC Monographs Vol. 100C). World Health Organization.
22. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2012). Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 100C.
23. Jones, D. L., et al. (2018): Jones, D. L., Oliver, I. W., & Owen, A. G. (2018). Biochar and its impacts on plant-soil-microbe interactions: A review of the current state of knowledge. Plant and Soil, 429, 1–25.
24. Kabata-Pendias, A. (2011). Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press.
25. Katsoyiannis, A., Sweetman, A. J., & Jones, K. C. (2011). PAH molecular diagnostic ratios: Do they surrogate the sources of PAHs in the environment? Environmental Pollution, 159(12), 3351–3355.
26. Katsoyiannis, A., Terzi, E., & Cai, Q. Y. (2011). On the occurrence, sources and health risks of PAHs in water systems. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2810–2815.
27. Kim, K. H., Jahan, S. A., Kabir, E., & Brown, R. J. (2013). A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environment International, 60, 71–80. .
28. Kortenkamp, A., Backhaus, T., & Faust, M. (2009). State of the art report on mixture toxicity. European Commission, Directorate-General for the Environment.
29. Kujawska, J., Pawłowska, M., Cel, W., & Wójcik-Oliveira, K. (2023). Leaching of heavy metals from wood ash: Influence of hydration and carbonation. Materials, 16(5), 1845.
30. Kumar, A., & Singh, R. K. (2021). Enrichment of metals in biochar. Environmental Technology & Innovation.
31. Kutnar, A., & Burnard, M. D. (2014). Sustainable use of wood in construction. In Sustainability of Construction Materials (pp. 161–188). Woodhead Publishing.
32. Lanphear, B. P., Rauch, S., Auinger, P., Allen, R. W., & Hornung, R. W. (2018). Low-level lead exposure and mortality in US adults: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 3(4), e177–e184.
33. Li, Y., Chen, J., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). Global trends in the thermal modification of wood: A systematic review of literature and patents. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135702.
34. Mastral, A. M., & Callén, M. S. (2000). A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from energy generation. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(15), 3051–3057.
35. Mengesha, A. (2023). Influence of pyrolysis parameters on PAH yields. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis.
36. Mengesha, A. (2023). Influence of pyrolysis parameters on PAH yields. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis.
37. Niu, L., Li, Y., Yu, P., & Ju, W. (2022). PAH concentrations in biochars from various feedstocks: A review of environmental risks and influence of pyrolysis parameters. Chemosphere, 291, 132924.
38. Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S., Steenhuisen, F., & Maxson, P. (2010). Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2005. Atmospheric Environment, 44(20), 2487–2499.
39. Puri, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. K. (2024). Mineral catalysis and metal speciation in biomass residues during thermal processing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 461, 132644.
40. Ramírez, N., Cuadras, A., Encinas, X., Marcé, R. M., & Borrull, F. (2011). Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in airborne particles. Talanta, 85(4), 1956–1964.
41. Ramírez, N., Cuadras, A., Encinas, X., Marcé, R. M., & Borrull, F. (2011). Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in airborne particles. Talanta, 85(4), 1956–1964.
42. Ravindra, K., Sokhi, R., & Van Grieken, R. (2008). Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmospheric Environment, 42(13), 2895–2921.
43. Rombolà, A. G., Meredith, W., Snape, C. E., Baronti, S., Genesio, L., Vaccari, F. P., Miglietta, F., & Fabbri, D. (2015). Fate of adsorption-unextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar amended soil. Science of the Total Environment, 536, 303–309.
44. Rombolà, A. G., Marisi, G., Marre, Q., Snape, C. E., & Fabbri, D. (2016). Sorption of PAHs to biochar surfaces: Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(23), 23315–23324.
45. Ruby, M. V., Schoof, R., Brattin, W., Goldade, M., Post, G., Harnois, M., ... & Edwards, D. (2016). Advances in bioavailability-based risk assessment of metals in soil. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 22(2), 208–232.
46. Ruby, M. V., Schoof, R., Brattin, W., Goldade, M., Post, G., Harnois, M., ... & Edwards, D. (2016). Advances in bioavailability-based risk assessment of metals in soil. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 22(2), 208–232.
47. Shen, G., Tao, S., Wei, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Shen, H., Huang, Y., Zhu, D., Yuan, C., Wang, H., Wang, R., Wang, L., & Liu, J. (2019). High-temperature pyrolysis and PAH formation from woody fuels. Energy & Fuels, 33(11), 11210–11221.
48. Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002). A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17(5), 517–568.
49. Smith, R., Woodard, K. R., & Sollenberger, L. E. (2014). Metal thresholds in wood ash for land application: Risk assessment and management. Environmental Management, 54, 1112–1125.
50. Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of biochar in soils: Predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Management.
51. Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of biochar in soils: Predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Management.
52. Tchounwou, P. B., Yedjou, C. G., Patlolla, A. K., & Sutton, D. J. (2012). Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology (pp. 133–164). Springer, Basel.
53. Tomczyk, A., Sokołowska, Z., & Boguta, P. (2020). Biochar physicochemical properties: Pyrolysis temperature and feedstock effects. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 19(1), 191–215.
54. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2004). Risk assessment guidance for superfund: Volume I – Human health evaluation manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance) (EPA/540/R/99/005).
55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2009). Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS): Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part A).
56. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2011). Exposure factors handbook: 2011 edition (EPA/600/R-09/052F). National Center for Environmental Assessment.
57. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2017). Provisional guidance for quantitative risk assessment of PAHs using relative potency factors. Office of Research and Development.
58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2018). Regional screening levels (RSL) user’s guide. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
59. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2019). Global mercury assessment 2018.
60. Wang, Z. (2017). Toxicity of soot and fly-ash. Environmental Science & Technology.
61. Wang, Z., Chen, J., Qiao, X., Yang, P., & Tian, F. (2020). Environmental transformations and fates of PAHs during thermal processing and waste handling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 384, 121–136.
62. Wang, Z., Chen, J., & Qiao, X. (2021). Integrated risk metrics for wood residues: Balancing environmental and health considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127732.
63. Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, P. (2024). Risk management of thermal processing by-products: A review of sustainable practices. Science of the Total Environment, 908, 168345.
64. World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). WHO human health risk assessment toolkit: Chemical hazards. International Programme on Chemical Safety.
65. World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). World Health Organization.
66. World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first addendum
67. Xiong, X., Liu, X., Yu, I. K. M., Wang, L., Zhou, J., Sun, X., Rinklebe, J., Shaheen, S. M., Ok, Y. S., Lin, Z., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2023). Potentially toxic elements in solid waste streams: Fate and management approaches. Waste Management, 155, 223–234.
68. Yang, P., Wang, Z., & Chen, J. (2018). Ring fusion and condensation in PAH growth: Mechanistic insights from thermal processing. Combustion and Flame, 192, 345–356