Authors :
Nuzula Elfa Rahma; Joko Triyono; Rusli Wahyuni; Estu Pangaribowo; Wanti
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2yuz286r
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mcey8xf6
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14534448
Abstract :
Waste management is a problem that will
become more complex along with the increase in
population and people's consumption behavior. An
increase in population will increase the volume of waste,
while consumption behavior will determine the diversity of
waste types. It is necessary to take an actual approach to
determine the waste management of an area to suit the
character of the residents in the area.
The data collection method uses a survey of
respondents and group discussions to determine the initial
data. Descriptive methods are used to explain qualitative
data. The assessment method with the Likert scale is used
for quantitative analysis.
Respondents characteristics of Socio-Economic
showed that the people of Karang Anyar Urban Village
were mostly of productive age with an average high school
education level. Respondents with adequate knowledge in
categories and tending to have good knowledge showed
that respondents had access to information about waste.
Resonance experience in waste management in the form of
transporting waste to TPS and environmental cleaning
services while experience in waste utilization is the result
of activities from probebaya in the form of socialization
and counseling.
The role of government/community leaders in waste
management was stated to be quite important where
respondents saw counseling by Pokmas. Waste
management facilities and infrastructure in Karang Anyar
Urban Village are declared inadequate with the lack of
waste bins both number and type (Organic-Inorganic) and
the absence of waste processing facilities such as
community composting tubs, waste sorting areas, etc.
The perception of the people of Karang Anyar Urban
Village is categorized as very agree/know about the
importance of good and appropriate waste management.
Direct community participation was categorized as
less participatory where there was not enough awareness
for residents to want to make waste management efforts.
Indirect community participation is in the category of
lack of participation where the community considers that
waste management activities must be carried out by the
government.
Keywords :
Household Waste, Community Perception, Urban Village, Waste Management.
References :
- Brown L, Davis A. Community involvement and participation in waste management programs. Int J Sustain Res. 2020; 14(1):45–58.
- Davisson A, Lee H. Government support as a catalyst for community-led initiatives on sustainable development goals. Sustainability Sci Res J. 2018; 14(1):45–58.
- Johnson M, Brown T. The role of education in shaping attitudes towards waste management practices among urban residents. Int Rev Environ Strateg. 2019; 20(2):123–35.
- Kimura Y, Nakamura R. Collaborative governance model enhances local capacity building through integrated solid waste management programs. J Environ Econ Asia Bus Stud. 2020; 12(3):123–36.
- Lee E, Kim J. Increasing public knowledge of recycling practices through interactive media campaigns. Educ Environment Res J. 2019; 25(11):173–86.
- Patel V, Shah R. Assessing the need for infrastructure for an effective solid waste management system. Int J Eng Sci Technol Solut. 2022; 16(3):123–35.
- Rahma NE. Behavior in waste management and conditions of waste management services in Malinau City. Poltanesa Bulletin. 2019.
- Smith J, Johnson K. Impact of education on environmental awareness. J Sustain Dev. 2018; 12(3):123–35.
- Smithson I, Taylor S. Public perception and participation in environmental conservation efforts. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2017; 47(11):2313–26.
- National Standards Agency (SNI). Method of taking and measuring examples of urban waste generation and composition (SNI 19-3964-1994). Jakarta: National Standards Agency; 1994.
- Thompson G, Wilson L. Evaluating the effectiveness of community-based reward programs to increase participation in sustainable behavior. J. Sustainability Stud 2021; Thompson, G., & Wilson, L. (2021). Evaluate the effectiveness of community-based rewards programs to increase participation in sustainable behavior. Journal of Sustainability Studies, 15(2), 45–58.
Waste management is a problem that will
become more complex along with the increase in
population and people's consumption behavior. An
increase in population will increase the volume of waste,
while consumption behavior will determine the diversity of
waste types. It is necessary to take an actual approach to
determine the waste management of an area to suit the
character of the residents in the area.
The data collection method uses a survey of
respondents and group discussions to determine the initial
data. Descriptive methods are used to explain qualitative
data. The assessment method with the Likert scale is used
for quantitative analysis.
Respondents characteristics of Socio-Economic
showed that the people of Karang Anyar Urban Village
were mostly of productive age with an average high school
education level. Respondents with adequate knowledge in
categories and tending to have good knowledge showed
that respondents had access to information about waste.
Resonance experience in waste management in the form of
transporting waste to TPS and environmental cleaning
services while experience in waste utilization is the result
of activities from probebaya in the form of socialization
and counseling.
The role of government/community leaders in waste
management was stated to be quite important where
respondents saw counseling by Pokmas. Waste
management facilities and infrastructure in Karang Anyar
Urban Village are declared inadequate with the lack of
waste bins both number and type (Organic-Inorganic) and
the absence of waste processing facilities such as
community composting tubs, waste sorting areas, etc.
The perception of the people of Karang Anyar Urban
Village is categorized as very agree/know about the
importance of good and appropriate waste management.
Direct community participation was categorized as
less participatory where there was not enough awareness
for residents to want to make waste management efforts.
Indirect community participation is in the category of
lack of participation where the community considers that
waste management activities must be carried out by the
government.
Keywords :
Household Waste, Community Perception, Urban Village, Waste Management.