Authors :
Dr. Kunal Malhotra; Dr. Tushar Aggarwal; Dr. Subhash Sharma; Dr. Anil Malhotra
Volume/Issue :
Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/2Es3GZP
DOI :
10.38124/IJISRT20AUG509
Abstract :
Prolene Hernia System is a tension free anterior
inguinal hernia repair using a bilayered modification
of inguinal hernia mesh. Inguinal hernia repair by
Prolene is comparable with almost equal operating
time, smaller incision and with a trend towards
decreased complications rate and reduced rate of
recurrences.
This study was conducted to study and to compare
the results of Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein
Tension Free mesh hernioplasty with respect to its
operative time, post-operative pain, intra/post-operative
complications and total hospital stay.
The effectiveness of PHS were compared to
Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernias repair in patients
presenting with uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia for
elective surgery in the Surgery department of IGMC,
Shimla.
Duration of surgery was shorter in Prolene Hernia
System group (p=0.04) than the Lichtenstein tension
free mesh hernioplasty [32 vs 34 minutes], The mean
pain intensity in present study was 2.9 in Lichtenstein
tension free mesh hernioplasty group and 2.7 in Prolene
Hernia System, No intra-operative complications were
seen with either of the two groups. Post-operative
complications in the form of Seroma formation were
more in Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty
group than Prolene Hernia System group (8 vs 0). There
were two cases of recurrence in the Lichtenstein tension
free mesh hernioplasty group, while no short-term
recurrence was seen in Prolene Hernia System group
over 12 weeks. Mean duration of post-operative hospital
stay was 1.57 days for Lichtenstein tension free mesh
hernioplasty group and 1.33 days for Prolene Hernia
System group.
This study concludes that even though the
difference between the two methods in this randomized
study were small, the Prolene Hernia System repair
method for open inguinal hernia repair was associated
with a shorter operative time, lower rate of recurrence,
as well as fewer complications when compared with the
Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty. Further
prospective studies are needed to rigorously evaluate
the comparative advantages of Prolene Hernia System
repair in relation to other repair methods
Keywords :
Prolene Hernia System, Myopectineal Orifice, Hernioplasty.
Prolene Hernia System is a tension free anterior
inguinal hernia repair using a bilayered modification
of inguinal hernia mesh. Inguinal hernia repair by
Prolene is comparable with almost equal operating
time, smaller incision and with a trend towards
decreased complications rate and reduced rate of
recurrences.
This study was conducted to study and to compare
the results of Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein
Tension Free mesh hernioplasty with respect to its
operative time, post-operative pain, intra/post-operative
complications and total hospital stay.
The effectiveness of PHS were compared to
Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernias repair in patients
presenting with uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia for
elective surgery in the Surgery department of IGMC,
Shimla.
Duration of surgery was shorter in Prolene Hernia
System group (p=0.04) than the Lichtenstein tension
free mesh hernioplasty [32 vs 34 minutes], The mean
pain intensity in present study was 2.9 in Lichtenstein
tension free mesh hernioplasty group and 2.7 in Prolene
Hernia System, No intra-operative complications were
seen with either of the two groups. Post-operative
complications in the form of Seroma formation were
more in Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty
group than Prolene Hernia System group (8 vs 0). There
were two cases of recurrence in the Lichtenstein tension
free mesh hernioplasty group, while no short-term
recurrence was seen in Prolene Hernia System group
over 12 weeks. Mean duration of post-operative hospital
stay was 1.57 days for Lichtenstein tension free mesh
hernioplasty group and 1.33 days for Prolene Hernia
System group.
This study concludes that even though the
difference between the two methods in this randomized
study were small, the Prolene Hernia System repair
method for open inguinal hernia repair was associated
with a shorter operative time, lower rate of recurrence,
as well as fewer complications when compared with the
Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty. Further
prospective studies are needed to rigorously evaluate
the comparative advantages of Prolene Hernia System
repair in relation to other repair methods
Keywords :
Prolene Hernia System, Myopectineal Orifice, Hernioplasty.