Authors :
Ketut Gendroyono; Arief Setiawan; Tutang Muhtar
Volume/Issue :
Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
http://tinyurl.com/4upnms75
Scribd :
http://tinyurl.com/yu5d5pr3
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10389910
Abstract :
Policy conditions and budget politics greatly
affect the determination of sections and pavement types
by road organisers, the number of proposed road
improvements each year is not proportional to the
amount of budget available. This greatly affects the
determination of pavement types, where road organisers
will choose a more economical pavement type that
adapts to the available budget to meet these interests,
although technically it will have an impact on not
achieving the planned life which results in high
maintenance costs. This study specifically tries to apply
the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method in the
interest of formulating and making decisions in
prioritising the selection of pavement types. It is hoped
that through this study it can be proven that the AHP
method can help policy makers, especially within the
scope of local government, o make decision making more
objective.The methods of this study include data
collection methods and analysis methods. In this study, a
questionnaire was used to collect data, involving
respondents who have more than 10 years of experience
and are considered experts in the field of roads and
bridges. Based on the analysis of the order of the priority
weight of the criteria for the priority selection of the type
of pavement, namely the technical criteria has the highest
weight of 0.344, Furthermore, the policy criteria have
the second highest weight value with a weight value of
0.247, in third place is the cost criteria with a weight
value of 0.230 and the last is the implementation criteria
with a weight value of 0.178. The order of alternative
types of pavement for road rehabilitation in the city of
Palu is: 1) AC-WC (Asphalt Concret Wearing Course)
(19.3%), 2) Macadam Penetration Layer (18.3%), 3)
HRS (Hot Roller Sheet) (16.5%), 4) Sand Sheet
(16.3%), 5) Composite Pavement (15.4%), 6) Rigid
Pavement (14.2%)
Keywords :
Road Rehabilitation Budget, Influential Criteria, Alternative Pavement Type Selection.
Policy conditions and budget politics greatly
affect the determination of sections and pavement types
by road organisers, the number of proposed road
improvements each year is not proportional to the
amount of budget available. This greatly affects the
determination of pavement types, where road organisers
will choose a more economical pavement type that
adapts to the available budget to meet these interests,
although technically it will have an impact on not
achieving the planned life which results in high
maintenance costs. This study specifically tries to apply
the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method in the
interest of formulating and making decisions in
prioritising the selection of pavement types. It is hoped
that through this study it can be proven that the AHP
method can help policy makers, especially within the
scope of local government, o make decision making more
objective.The methods of this study include data
collection methods and analysis methods. In this study, a
questionnaire was used to collect data, involving
respondents who have more than 10 years of experience
and are considered experts in the field of roads and
bridges. Based on the analysis of the order of the priority
weight of the criteria for the priority selection of the type
of pavement, namely the technical criteria has the highest
weight of 0.344, Furthermore, the policy criteria have
the second highest weight value with a weight value of
0.247, in third place is the cost criteria with a weight
value of 0.230 and the last is the implementation criteria
with a weight value of 0.178. The order of alternative
types of pavement for road rehabilitation in the city of
Palu is: 1) AC-WC (Asphalt Concret Wearing Course)
(19.3%), 2) Macadam Penetration Layer (18.3%), 3)
HRS (Hot Roller Sheet) (16.5%), 4) Sand Sheet
(16.3%), 5) Composite Pavement (15.4%), 6) Rigid
Pavement (14.2%)
Keywords :
Road Rehabilitation Budget, Influential Criteria, Alternative Pavement Type Selection.
