Authors : Parth Harkishan Joshi; Dr. D. N. Parekh

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yn2kajvn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4h56zuyc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1169

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Self-compacting concrete (SCC) incorporating ceramic waste powder (CWP) as a partial cement replacement offers a route to reduce both landfill burden and embodied carbon in construction, but characterising the combined effect of mix design variables on the full suite of fresh and hardened properties normally demands extensive laboratory testing. This study evaluates Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) as a data-efficient surrogate modelling approach for predicting twelve fresh and mechanical properties of CWP-based SCC from three mix design inputs: cement content, CWP content, and water-to-binder (w/b) ratio. A dataset of twenty-one experimentally characterised SCC mixes, spanning slump flow, T500 time, V-funnel time, L-box ratio, segregation resistance, compressive strength (7, 28, and 90 days), split tensile strength (7, 28, and 90 days), and 28-day flexural strength, was modelled using independent GPR models with a Matern 5/2 kernel and white-noise term, with performance assessed exclusively through leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) given the small sample size. Eleven of the twelve properties were predicted with LOOCV coefficients of determination (R2 ) between 0.80 and 0.99, with the strongest performance observed for slump flow and split tensile strength (R2 ≥ 0.96). Twenty-eight-day flexural strength was the exception, with a negative LOOCV R2 indicating that the three mix design inputs alone do not explain its variability in this dataset. The results demonstrate that GPR, combined with rigorous LOOCV validation and explicit predictive uncertainty, is a viable and transparent tool for mix-design-stage property prediction in small experimental SCC datasets, while also illustrating the diagnostic value of LOOCV in identifying properties that require additional explanatory variables.

Keywords : Self-Compacting Concrete; Ceramic Waste Powder; Gaussian Process Regression; Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation; Machine Learning; Sustainable Construction Materials; SDG 9 — Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.

References :

1. EFNARC, Specification and Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete. Farnham, UK: European Federation of National Associations Representing producers and applicators of specialist building products, 2002/2005.
2. S. T. Aly, A. S. El-Dieb, and M. Reda Taha, "Effect of high-volume ceramic waste powder as partial cement replacement on fresh and compressive strength of self-compacting concrete," Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, p. 04018374, 2019.
3. A. AlArab, B. Hamad, G. Chehab, and J. J. Assaad, "Use of ceramic-waste powder as value-added pozzolanic material with improved thermal properties," Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 32, no. 9, p. 04020243, 2020.
4. A. H. Khairi and S. K. Rejeb, "The effects of waste ceramic powders and waste glass powders on the rheological and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete," Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, 2024.
5. P. D. Viramgama, S. R. Vaniya, and K. B. Parikh, "Effect of ceramic waste powder in self compacting concrete properties: A critical review," IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 8-13, 2016.
6. R. Alyousef, O. Benjeddou, M. A. Khadimallah, A. M. Mohamed, and C. Soussi, "Study of the effects of marble powder amount on the self-compacting concretes properties by microstructure analysis on cement-marble powder pastes," Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 6018613, 2018.
7. M. J. Taher, T. S. Al-Attar, and A. S. Al-Adili, "Compatibility and mechanical performance of high-strength self-compacting concrete produced with recycled glass powder," Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1107-1119, 2024.
8. R. Busic, M. Bensic, I. Milicevic, and K. Strukar, "Prediction models for the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete with recycled rubber and silica fume," Materials, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 1821, 2020.
9. O. M. Ofuyatan, O. B. Agbawhe, D. O. Omole, C. A. Igwegbe, and J. O. Ighalo, "RSM and ANN modelling of the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete with silica fume and plastic waste as partial constituent replacement," Cleaner Materials, vol. 4, p. 100065, 2022.
10. C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
11. Z. Zou, B. Peng, L. Xie, and S. Song, "Enhanced Gaussian process model for predicting compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)," Materials, vol. 17, no. 24, p. 6140, 2024.
12. A. R. Al-Shamasneh et al., "Application of machine learning techniques to predict the compressive strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 2025.
13. P. Xu, X. Ji, M. Li, and W. Lu, "Small data machine learning in materials science," npj Computational Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 42, 2023.
14. S. Ghani, N. Kumar, M. Gupta, and S. Saharan, "Machine learning approaches for real-time prediction of compressive strength in self-compacting concrete," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 2743-2760, 2024.