Authors :
Alhaji Osman Bah; Abdul Hamid Turay; Iyeba Alpha Kallon; Alhajie Mohamed Sesay
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bdfbnutz
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct769
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Maternal health risk prediction can support the early identification of pregnancies that may require closer clinical attention, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates seven supervised machine-learning classifiers— Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Polynomial and Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernels, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—for three-class maternal health-risk classification. The primary analysis uses a 500-record dataset obtained from Poly Clinic, Peninsula Road, Sierra Leone, containing eight predictors: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, BMI, heart rate, parity, and hemoglobin.
Keywords :
Maternal Health, Machine Learning, Maternal Risk Prediction, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, SMOTE, Sierra Leone.
References :
- World Health Organization (WHO), Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2023.
- R. Carshon-Marsh et al., “Child, maternal, and adult mortality in Sierra Leone: Nationally representative mortality survey 2018–20,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. e114–e123, Jan. 2022.
- S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2021.
- C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2006.
- K. G. Dinesh, K. Arumugaraj, K. D. Santhosh, and V. Mareeswari, “Prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning algorithms,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 165, pp. 570–576, 2019.
- K. Shameer, K. W. Johnson, B. S. Glicksberg, J. T. Dudley, and P. P. Sengupta, “Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: Are we there yet?” Heart, vol. 104, no. 14, pp. 1156–1164, 2018.
- World Health Organization, “Improving national and district capacity to tackle maternal mortality in Sierra Leone,” WHO Regional Office for Africa, 2020.
- D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant, Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.
- C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, “LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines,” ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2011.
- J. H. Friedman, “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine,” Ann. Statist., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189–1232, 2001.
- T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2016, pp. 785–794.
- G. Ke et al., “LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 3146–3154.
- L. Prokhorenkova, G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A. Dorogush, and A. Gulin, “CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018, pp. 6638–6648.
- H. He and E. A. Garcia, “Learning from imbalanced data,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1263–1284, Sept. 2009.
- N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002.
- G. Douzas and F. Bacao, “Effective data generation for imbalanced learning using conditional generative adversarial networks,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 91, pp. 464–471, 2018.
- T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009.
- M. Ahmed, M. A. Kashem, M. Rahman, and S. Khatun, “Maternal Health Risk,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2020, doi: 10.24432/C5DP5D.
- M. U. Mojumdar, M. Assaduzzaman, D. Sarker, H. A. Shifa, M. A. H. Sajeeb, S. Bari, N. R. Chakraborty, and M. J. Alam, “Maternal Health Risk Assessment Dataset,” Mendeley Data, 2024, doi: 10.17632/p5w98dvbbk.1.
Maternal health risk prediction can support the early identification of pregnancies that may require closer clinical attention, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates seven supervised machine-learning classifiers— Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Polynomial and Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernels, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—for three-class maternal health-risk classification. The primary analysis uses a 500-record dataset obtained from Poly Clinic, Peninsula Road, Sierra Leone, containing eight predictors: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, BMI, heart rate, parity, and hemoglobin.
Keywords :
Maternal Health, Machine Learning, Maternal Risk Prediction, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, SMOTE, Sierra Leone.