⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Predicting Maternal Health Risks in Sierra Leone Using Machine Learning Models


Authors : Alhaji Osman Bah; Abdul Hamid Turay; Iyeba Alpha Kallon; Alhajie Mohamed Sesay

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdfbnutz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct769

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Maternal health risk prediction can support the early identification of pregnancies that may require closer clinical attention, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates seven supervised machine-learning classifiers— Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Polynomial and Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernels, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—for three-class maternal health-risk classification. The primary analysis uses a 500-record dataset obtained from Poly Clinic, Peninsula Road, Sierra Leone, containing eight predictors: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, BMI, heart rate, parity, and hemoglobin.

Keywords : Maternal Health, Machine Learning, Maternal Risk Prediction, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, SMOTE, Sierra Leone.

References :

  1. World Health Organization (WHO), Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2023.
  2. R. Carshon-Marsh et al., “Child, maternal, and adult mortality in Sierra Leone: Nationally representative mortality survey 2018–20,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. e114–e123, Jan. 2022.
  3. S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2021.
  4. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2006.
  5. K. G. Dinesh, K. Arumugaraj, K. D. Santhosh, and V. Mareeswari, “Prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning algorithms,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 165, pp. 570–576, 2019.
  6. K. Shameer, K. W. Johnson, B. S. Glicksberg, J. T. Dudley, and P. P. Sengupta, “Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: Are we there yet?” Heart, vol. 104, no. 14, pp. 1156–1164, 2018.
  7. World Health Organization, “Improving national and district capacity to tackle maternal mortality in Sierra Leone,” WHO Regional Office for Africa, 2020.
  8. D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant, Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.
  9. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, “LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines,” ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2011.
  10. J. H. Friedman, “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine,” Ann. Statist., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189–1232, 2001.
  11. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2016, pp. 785–794.
  12. G. Ke et al., “LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 3146–3154.
  13. L. Prokhorenkova, G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A. Dorogush, and A. Gulin, “CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018, pp. 6638–6648.
  14. H. He and E. A. Garcia, “Learning from imbalanced data,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1263–1284, Sept. 2009.
  15. N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002.
  16. G. Douzas and F. Bacao, “Effective data generation for imbalanced learning using conditional generative adversarial networks,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 91, pp. 464–471, 2018.
  17. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009.
  18. M. Ahmed, M. A. Kashem, M. Rahman, and S. Khatun, “Maternal Health Risk,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2020, doi: 10.24432/C5DP5D.
  19. M. U. Mojumdar, M. Assaduzzaman, D. Sarker, H. A. Shifa, M. A. H. Sajeeb, S. Bari, N. R. Chakraborty, and M. J. Alam, “Maternal Health Risk Assessment Dataset,” Mendeley Data, 2024, doi: 10.17632/p5w98dvbbk.1.

Maternal health risk prediction can support the early identification of pregnancies that may require closer clinical attention, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates seven supervised machine-learning classifiers— Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Polynomial and Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernels, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—for three-class maternal health-risk classification. The primary analysis uses a 500-record dataset obtained from Poly Clinic, Peninsula Road, Sierra Leone, containing eight predictors: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, BMI, heart rate, parity, and hemoglobin.

Keywords : Maternal Health, Machine Learning, Maternal Risk Prediction, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, SMOTE, Sierra Leone.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe