Authors :
Lelisa Daniel
Volume/Issue :
Volume 6 - 2021, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/2VMsLH1
Abstract :
Philosophy’ is a controversial term which can
be refuted and defended within intellectuals whether or
not it is an issue of academic/scientific sphere. Most
dominantly among the intellectual discourses of science is
simply an attempt of examining the secret of nature and
social beliefs. However, when we look from object to
subject introspectively one can find the philosophical
questions of philosophy itself, intellectual, and
environment. Explicitly it raise questions such as: what is
philosophy, who is ‘intellectual’, what is environment,
what is the standard to be called intellectual, and how the
‘object’/’environment’/’body’ appears to such person.
Providing an explanatory response to those questions
involve careful analysis and/or enquiry of both philosophy
and science itself.
To do so it starts from analyzing of antiphilosophical
consideration of philosophy as an ‘activity’ rather than
science. While following in such perspective it is our duty
to show that it is possible to apply the claim of ‘activity’
upon philosophy itself. The result will be: philosophy of
philosophy, philosophy of mind and philosophy of nature.
This further involves dismantling of those concepts in
which metaphysics, epistemology and axiology appear
from branches of philosophy. Thus, holistic philosophy
becomes burst itself to show the interconnection between
philosophy and antiphilosophy.
Such holistic philosophy is derived from positive
psychology in which both negativity and positivity are
handled equally. In holism everything is seen through
itself not a means to other end. Therefore, axiological test
of ethics through anthropocentrism and
nonanthropocentrism will appear in order to clarify our
understanding of what is: man, nature, environment and
wellbeing
Keywords :
Philosophy, Intellectuals, Environment, Science, Truth, Value
Philosophy’ is a controversial term which can
be refuted and defended within intellectuals whether or
not it is an issue of academic/scientific sphere. Most
dominantly among the intellectual discourses of science is
simply an attempt of examining the secret of nature and
social beliefs. However, when we look from object to
subject introspectively one can find the philosophical
questions of philosophy itself, intellectual, and
environment. Explicitly it raise questions such as: what is
philosophy, who is ‘intellectual’, what is environment,
what is the standard to be called intellectual, and how the
‘object’/’environment’/’body’ appears to such person.
Providing an explanatory response to those questions
involve careful analysis and/or enquiry of both philosophy
and science itself.
To do so it starts from analyzing of antiphilosophical
consideration of philosophy as an ‘activity’ rather than
science. While following in such perspective it is our duty
to show that it is possible to apply the claim of ‘activity’
upon philosophy itself. The result will be: philosophy of
philosophy, philosophy of mind and philosophy of nature.
This further involves dismantling of those concepts in
which metaphysics, epistemology and axiology appear
from branches of philosophy. Thus, holistic philosophy
becomes burst itself to show the interconnection between
philosophy and antiphilosophy.
Such holistic philosophy is derived from positive
psychology in which both negativity and positivity are
handled equally. In holism everything is seen through
itself not a means to other end. Therefore, axiological test
of ethics through anthropocentrism and
nonanthropocentrism will appear in order to clarify our
understanding of what is: man, nature, environment and
wellbeing
Keywords :
Philosophy, Intellectuals, Environment, Science, Truth, Value
