Authors : Supriono; Bagiyo Suwasono; Daniel M. Rosyid

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4xdsxuxk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun963

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : As the world’s largest archipelagic nation, Indonesia relies heavily on maritime transportation, positioning its national shipbuilding industry as a strategic sector. This study aims to determine the optimal strategy to accelerate ship construction by optimizing production facilities, with a specific focus on the assembly workshop. A Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is applied to evaluate three alternative facility development strategies based on five key criteria: investment, production capacity, human resource requirements, design/layout efficiency, and space utilization. The analysis identifies Alternative 2—efficient adjustment in the number of facility units—as the most favorable option, achieving the highest performance score (0.98). These findings offer a strategic foundation for enhancing the production capacity of national shipyards from 35 to 50 blocks per month.

Keywords : Production Facility Optimization, Shipbuilding Efficiency, Strategic Planning, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM).

References :

1. Ma’ruf, A. (2014). Teknologi Produksi Kapal: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Penerbit Galangan.
2. Bruce, A. (2003). Lean Production for the Shipbuilding Industry. New York: Marine Press.
3. Huang, Y. & Shih, H. (2005). Challenges in Shipbuilding. Journal of Marine Engineering, 37(2), 123-134.
4. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.
5. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Chichester: Wiley.
6. Kim, S.W., & Lee, Y.H. (2015). Shipyard Production Capacity Optimization Using Simulation-Based Scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 53(4), 1023-1035.