Authors : Bruno Houessou; Abdel Malik Garba Gambari

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4vyzyx6r

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug780

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Healthcare waste-treatment technologies are frequently evaluated through procurement completion, installation status, technical functionality, or nominal treatment capacity. Although useful, these indicators provide only a partial account of whether an installed asset is delivering sustained value to a health system. Incinerators illustrate this distinction particularly clearly because effective waste treatment depends not only on combustion equipment but also on waste segregation and transport, supporting infrastructure, energy and fuel availability, operator competence, operating procedures, maintenance, occupational protection, environmental safeguards, performance information, financing, and governance. This study examined the lifecycle performance of healthcare waste-treatment assets across eight anonymized sites within a resource-constrained health system. A retrospective multi-site technical assessment combined documentary review, structured stakeholder interviews, direct site inspection, functional verification, and comparison between planned, installed, and observed conditions. Analysis was organized around five interconnected dimensions: asset and infrastructure readiness, operational performance, waste-treatment service delivery, safety and environmental performance, and lifecycle sustainability. Although the core incineration equipment was generally technically functional where installation had been completed, effective service delivery varied considerably. Energy failures, incomplete operating cycles, inadequate wasteflow arrangements, absence of preventive maintenance, incomplete operator protection, weak performance documentation, and dependence on project-based recurrent financing constrained performance. Cross-site analysis revealed successive distinctions between installed capacity, operational capacity, effective treatment capacity, safe service capacity, and sustainable lifecycle performance. These states are not proposed as a new asset-management framework or maturity model. Rather, they represent analytical performance boundaries through which the conversion of capital investment into healthsystem and environmental value can be examined. Lifecycle optimization of healthcare waste-treatment assets therefore requires management of the complete asset-service system rather than the combustion equipment alone.

Keywords : Healthcare Waste; Incineration; Asset Lifecycle Management; Healthcare Technology Management; Waste-Treatment Capacity; Environmental Safety; Maintenance; Sustainability; ISO 55000; Health-System Value.

References :

1. World Health Organization. Health-care waste. Geneva: World Health Organization; updated 24 October 2024.
2. World Health Organization. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. ISBN 978-92-4-154856-4.
3. World Health Organization. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities: a summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
4. Cook E, Woolridge A, Stapp P, Edmondson S, Velis CA. Medical and healthcare waste generation, storage, treatment and disposal: a systematic scoping review of risks to occupational and public health. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2023;53(15):1452–1477. doi:10.1080/10643389.2022.2150495.
5. World Health Organization. Overview of technologies for the treatment of infectious and sharp waste from health care facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. ISBN 978-92-4-151622-8.
6. Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Afonso SAV. Incineration of healthcare wastes: management of atmospheric emissions through waste segregation. Waste Management. 2005;25(6):638–648. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.017.
7. Rogers DEC, Brent AC. Small-scale medical waste incinerators—experiences and trials in South Africa. Waste Management. 2006;26(11):1229–1236. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.08.007.
8. Ibáñez R, Andrés A, Viguri JR, Ortiz I, Irabien JA. Characterisation and management of incinerator wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2000;79(3):215–227. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00268-5.
9. Ajay SV, Prathish KP. Dioxins emissions from bio-medical waste incineration: a systematic review on emission factors, inventories, trends and health risk studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2024;465:133384. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133384.
10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 55000:2024 Asset management — Vocabulary, overview and principles. Geneva: ISO; 2024.
11. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 55001:2024 Asset management — Asset management system — Requirements. Geneva: ISO; 2024.
12. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 55013:2024 Asset management — Guidance on the management of data assets. Geneva: ISO; 2024.
13. Zikhathile T, Atagana H, Bwapwa J, Sawtell D. A review of the impact that healthcare risk waste treatment technologies have on the environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(19):11967.
14. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 55012:2024 Asset management — Guidance on people involvement and competence. Geneva: ISO; 2024.
15. Kenny C, Priyadarshini A. Review of current healthcare waste management methods and their effect on global health. Healthcare. 2021;9(3):284. doi:10.3390/healthcare9030284.
16. Windfeld ES, Brooks MSL. Medical waste management—A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015;163:98–108. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.013.
17. Khan BA, Cheng L, Khan AA, Ahmed H. Healthcare waste management in Asian developing countries: a mini review. Waste Management & Research. 2019;37(9):863–875. doi:10.1177/0734242X19857470.
18. Chisholm JM, Zamani R, Negm AM, Said N, Abdel Daiem MM, Dibaj M, Akrami M. Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: a narrative review. Waste Management & Research. 2021;39(9):1149–1163. doi:10.1177/0734242X211029175.
19. Padmanabhan KK, Barik D. Health hazards of medical waste and its disposal. In: Barik D, ed. Energy from Toxic Organic Waste for Heat and Power Generation. Woodhead Publishing; 2019:99–118. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102528-4.00008-0.
20. Adu RO, Gyasi SF, Essumang DK, Otabil KB. Medical waste-sorting and management practices in five hospitals in Ghana. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2020;2020:2934296. doi:10.1155/2020/2934296.
21. Janik-Karpinska E, Brancaleoni R, Niemcewicz M, et al. Healthcare waste—A serious problem for global health. Healthcare. 2023;11(2):242.
22. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund. Universal water, sanitation, hygiene, waste and electricity services in all health care facilities to achieve quality care: Global framework for action 2024–2030. Geneva/New York: WHO/UNICEF; 2024.
23. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund. Water, sanitation, hygiene, environmental cleaning and waste management in health care facilities: 2023 data update and special focus on primary health care. Geneva/New York: WHO/UNICEF; 2024.
24. World Health Organization. Safe management of pharmaceutical waste from health care facilities: global best practices. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
25. World Health Organization. Global analysis of health care waste in the context of COVID-19: status, impacts and recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. ISBN 978-92-4-003961-2.
26. Batterman S. Findings on an Assessment of Small-scale Incinerators for Health-care Waste. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
27. Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Afonso SAV. Incineration of different types of medical wastes: emission factors for particulate matter and heavy metals. Environmental Science & Technology. 2003;37(14):3152–3157. doi:10.1021/es026209p.
28. Tait PW, Brew J, Che A, et al. The health impacts of waste incineration: a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2020;44(1):40–48. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12939.
29. Fadaei A. Comparison of medical waste management methods in different countries: a systematic review. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2023;38(2):339–348. doi:10.1515/reveh-2021-0170.
30. World Health Organization. Dioxins and their effects on human health. Geneva: World Health Organization; current fact sheet.
31. United Nations Environment Programme. Minimum Specifications for Health Care Waste Incineration. Nairobi: UNEP; 2012.
32. Lattanzio S, Stefanizzi P, D'Ambrosio M, Cuscianna E, Riformato G, Migliore G, Tafuri S, Bianchi FP. Waste management and the perspective of a green hospital—A systematic narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(23):15812. doi:10.3390/ijerph192315812.
33. Soares SR, Finotti AR, da Silva VP, Alvarenga RAF. Applications of life cycle assessment and cost analysis in health care waste management. Waste Management. 2013;33(1):175–183. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.021.
34. Njagi NA, Oloo MA, Kithinji J, Kithinji MJ. Health-Care Waste Incineration and Related Dangers to Public Health: Case Study of the Two Teaching and Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Journal of Community Health. 2012;37(6):1168–1171. doi:10.1007/s10900-012-9578-4.