Authors : Jeryl Joselin P. Morales; John Lester S. Resuello; Melmar Camacho; Gececlene C. Estorico

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mr36su2a

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4wvke223

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr266

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Transportation noise pollution is a critical environmental and public health concern, particularly in urban areas where increasing traffic density contributes to elevated noise levels. Prolonged exposure to excessive transport noise has been associated with adverse health effects, including hearing impairment, sleep disturbances, increased stress levels, and an elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases. This systematic review examines noise pollution across various transport modes—including buses, cars, trucks, motorcycles, subways, and aircraft—and compares recorded noise levels to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard limits. The findings indicate that several transport modes exceed recommended thresholds, with motorcycles (88.9 dBA), heavy trucks (87.5 dBA), and auto-rickshaws (85.5 dBA) surpassing their respective limits of 85 dBA, 85 dBA, and 82 dBA. Among public transport options, buses exhibit an average noise level of 81.91 dBA, exceeding the standard of 80 dBA, while subways (79.8 dBA) and streetcars (71.5 dBA) remain within acceptable limits. The highest recorded noise level was for commercial passenger aircraft at 135.0 dBA, whereas the lowest was for bicycles at 69.65 dBA, remaining below the 70 dBA threshold. The most frequently reported sources of excessive noise in urban transport, including engine vibrations, exhaust systems, tire-road interactions, and sudden vehicle movements. Furthermore, this review evaluates various mitigation strategies, emphasizing the role of advancements in vehicle technology, infrastructure modifications, traffic management, and policy enforcement in reducing transportation noise. The adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles, noise-absorbing road surfaces, urban green spaces, and stricter noise regulations are identified as effective strategies; however, persistent high noise exposure suggests that current measures require more robust implementation and enforcement. By providing a comprehensive assessment of urban transportation noise levels and their health implications, this study highlights the necessity for enhanced noise regulation and mitigation efforts. Its findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, urban planners, and public health officials in developing evidence-based strategies to minimize noise pollution and its associated health risks. Given the increasing reliance on public and private transportation, addressing transport noise pollution is imperative to fostering healthier and more sustainable urban environments.

Keywords : Environmental Noise, Noise-Induced Health Effects, Public Health, Traffic Noise Exposure, Transportation Noise.

References :

1. Babisch, W. (2008). Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise and Health, 10(38), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.39005
2. Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S. A., & Stansfeld, S. A. (2014). Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 383(9925), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
3. European Environment Agency. (2020). Environmental noise in Europe – 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-noise-in-europe
4. European Parliament and Council. (2002). Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Official Journal of the European Communities.
5. Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D., & Schuemer, R. (2017). WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: A systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121539
6. International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 1996-1:2016 Acoustics – Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise – Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html
7. Kamineni, A., Duda, S. K., Chowdary, V., & Prasad, C. (2019). Modelling of noise pollution due to heterogeneous highway traffic in India. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 20(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2019-0003
8. Karimi, A., Nasiri, S., Kazerooni, F., & Oliaei, M. (2010). Noise-induced hearing loss risk assessment in truck drivers. Noise and Health, 12(46), 49. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.59999
9. Kasagıcı, B., & Ates, N. (2021). Evaluation of environmental noise pollution (Traffic, schools, hospitals) and noise perception. Energy Environment & Storage, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.52924/ywkd5166
10. Kumari, S., Sharma, A., & Ghosh, A. K. (2023). Noise pollution and associated health impacts at Ganeshpeth Bus Terminus in Nagpur, India. Noise Mapping, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2022-0168
11. Lacerda, A., Ribas, A., Mendes, J., & Andrade, P. (2004, December 1). Noise level and its perception by commuters in urban buses of Curitiba. Journal of the Canadian Acoustical Association. https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/1706
12. Lu, Y., Chen, L., Wu, S. F., Hu, J., & Li, H. (2022). Analyzing motorcycle low-frequency noise. Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2591728522500050
13. Paviotti, M., & Vogiatzis, K. (2012). On the outdoor annoyance from scooter and motorbike noise in the urban environment. Science of the Total Environment. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969712006560
14. Schwela, D., & Zali, O. (1999). Urban traffic pollution. Spon Press.
15. Sørensen, M., & Poulsen, A. H. (2021). Transportation noise and health. In S. Dzhambov & D. Dimitrova (Eds.), Noise and public health (pp. 73-95). Elsevier.
16. Supriya Kumari, S., Sharma, A., & Ghosh, A. K. (2024). Noise pollution and its impact on human health. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/noise-2022-0180/html
17. World Health Organization. (1999). Guidelines for community noise. WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66217
18. World Health Organization. (2018). Environmental noise guidelines for the European region. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289053563
19. World Health Organization. (2021). Noise and health impacts: WHO findings and recommendations. WHO.
20. Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005). Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: A case study in Sheffield. Journal of Urban Design, 10(1), 61–80.
21. Yao, C. M., Cushing, S. L., & Lin, V. Y. (2017). Noise exposure while commuting in Toronto - A study of personal and public transportation. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0239-6
22. Yavuz, A., Hazar-Yavuz, A. N., & Hacıbektaşoğlu, S. E. (2024). Vehicle noise pollution awareness for human health and environmental impacts: A comprehensive review. Acta Pharmaceutica Sciencia, 62(2), 244-266. https://www.actapharmsci.com/pdf.php?id=869
23. Respicio, H. (2024b, April 12). Noise pollution Philippines. RESPICIO & CO. https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/noise-pollution-philippines?