Authors :
Pinjari Moul Ali; Dr. M. Srirama Chandra; S. M. D. Musheed; Ediga Balakrishna Godd; Visana Karra Triveni
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/444x7rk4
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3fx2wbs6
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar2060
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Cisplatin remains the cornerstone of chemoradiation in head and neck cancers, particularly oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC). Despite its proven efficacy, its clinical utility is limited by dose-dependent systemic toxicities—including
nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and myelosuppression—as well as the frequent emergence of intrinsic and
acquired resistance. Carboplatin, while less toxic, demonstrates reduced potency, underscoring the need for innovative
therapeutic strategies.
Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative approach, offering novel drug delivery systems that enhance tumor
specificity, improve pharmacokinetics, and minimize off-target effects. Liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic
nanocarriers, dendrimers, and exosome-based systems have shown promise in preclinical and early clinical studies. These
nanocarriers not only improve cisplatin bioavailability but also address resistance mechanisms by bypassing efflux pumps,
modulating DNA repair pathways, and enabling controlled, tumor-microenvironment-responsive drug release.
Importantly, nanocarrier-mediated cisplatin delivery can be integrated into multimodal therapy, combining with
immunotherapy, targeted agents, and radiotherapy to achieve synergistic effects. Advances in biomarker-guided therapy,
such as LC3B-II and other molecular predictors of cisplatin response, further strengthen the translational potential of
nanotechnology in oral and head and neck cancers.
This review synthesizes current progress in nanotechnology-driven cisplatin delivery, explores molecular mechanisms
of resistance, and highlights translational opportunities and challenges—including scalability, regulatory hurdles, and
accessibility in resource-limited settings. By bridging conventional chemotherapy with cutting-edge nanomedicine, these
innovations hold promise to redefine therapeutic outcomes in high-burden regions such as South Asia, where oral cancer
remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality.
References :
- Ranasinghe R, Mathai M, Alshawsh MA, Zulli A. Nanocarrier-mediated cancer therapy with cisplatin: a meta-analysis with a promising new paradigm. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28171.
- Goldberg M, Manzi A, Birdi A, et al. A nanoengineered topical transmucosal cisplatin delivery system induces anti-tumor response in animal models and patients with oral cancer. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4829.
- Ahmed BA, Mohsen ROM, Sharaky M, et al. Effect of cisplatin/gold chitosan nanocomposite on oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral epithelial cells. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2025;16(4).
- Cheng Y, Li S, Gao L, et al. The molecular basis and therapeutic aspects of cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:761379.
- Sandu K, Warta R, Theile D, et al. Cisplatin resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is linked to DNA damage response and cell cycle arrest transcriptomics rather than poor drug uptake. Cancer Drug Resist. 2025;8:51.
- Griso-Acevedo A, Navas F, Calvo N, et al. Overcoming cisplatin resistance in 3D oral squamous cell carcinoma models via nanoparticle-mediated Pt (IV) drug delivery. bioRxiv. 2026. Preprint.
- Su KY, Khoo XH, Paterson IC, et al. Autophagy and extracellular vesicles mediate cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma with LC3B-II as a potential non-invasive biomarker. Sci Rep. 2025;15:15945.
- Su KY. Potential role of extracellular vesicles in cisplatin resistance: autophagy-related markers in OSCC cells. Monash University Thesis. 2024.
- Pavan SR, Prabhu A. Advanced cisplatin nanoformulations as targeted drug delivery platforms for lung carcinoma treatment: a review. J Mater Sci. 2022;57:16192–16227.
- Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(8):573–84.
- Dasari S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364–78.
- Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 2012;31(15):1869–83.
- Oun R, Moussa YE, Wheate NJ. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: a review for chemists. Dalton Trans. 2018;47(19):6645–53.
- Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(6):2091–8.
- Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C, et al. Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1695–704.
- Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL, et al. An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(1):92–8.
- Ghosh S, Cisplatin: The first metal-based anticancer drug. Bioorg Chem. 2019;88:102925.
- Sancho-Martínez SM, Prieto-García L, Prieto M, et al. Mechanisms of cisplatin nephrotoxicity: molecular pathways. Toxics. 2022;10(1):6.
- Rades D, Seidl D, Janssen S, et al. Cisplatin versus carboplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(9):4983–8.
- Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 2012;31(15):1869–83.
- Oun R, Moussa YE, Wheate NJ. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: a review for chemists. Dalton Trans. 2018;47(19):6645–53.
- Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(6):2091–8.
- Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C, et al. Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1695–704.
- Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL, et al. An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(1):92–8.
- Ghosh S, Cisplatin: The first metal-based anticancer drug. Bioorg Chem. 2019;88:102925.
- Sancho-Martínez SM, Prieto-García L, Prieto M, et al. Mechanisms of cisplatin nephrotoxicity: molecular pathways. Toxics. 2022;10(1):6.
- Rades D, Seidl D, Janssen S, et al. Cisplatin versus carboplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced head
- Cheng Y, Li S, Gao L, et al. The molecular basis and therapeutic aspects of cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:761379.
- Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 2012;31(15):1869–83.
- Su KY, Khoo XH, Paterson IC, et al. Autophagy and extracellular vesicles mediate cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma with LC3B-II as a potential non-invasive biomarker. Sci Rep. 2025;15:15945.
- Ranasinghe R, Mathai M, Alshawsh MA, Zulli A. Nanocarrier-mediated cancer therapy with cisplatin: a meta-analysis with a promising new paradigm. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28171.
Cisplatin remains the cornerstone of chemoradiation in head and neck cancers, particularly oral squamous cell
carcinoma (OSCC). Despite its proven efficacy, its clinical utility is limited by dose-dependent systemic toxicities—including
nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and myelosuppression—as well as the frequent emergence of intrinsic and
acquired resistance. Carboplatin, while less toxic, demonstrates reduced potency, underscoring the need for innovative
therapeutic strategies.
Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative approach, offering novel drug delivery systems that enhance tumor
specificity, improve pharmacokinetics, and minimize off-target effects. Liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic
nanocarriers, dendrimers, and exosome-based systems have shown promise in preclinical and early clinical studies. These
nanocarriers not only improve cisplatin bioavailability but also address resistance mechanisms by bypassing efflux pumps,
modulating DNA repair pathways, and enabling controlled, tumor-microenvironment-responsive drug release.
Importantly, nanocarrier-mediated cisplatin delivery can be integrated into multimodal therapy, combining with
immunotherapy, targeted agents, and radiotherapy to achieve synergistic effects. Advances in biomarker-guided therapy,
such as LC3B-II and other molecular predictors of cisplatin response, further strengthen the translational potential of
nanotechnology in oral and head and neck cancers.
This review synthesizes current progress in nanotechnology-driven cisplatin delivery, explores molecular mechanisms
of resistance, and highlights translational opportunities and challenges—including scalability, regulatory hurdles, and
accessibility in resource-limited settings. By bridging conventional chemotherapy with cutting-edge nanomedicine, these
innovations hold promise to redefine therapeutic outcomes in high-burden regions such as South Asia, where oral cancer
remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality.