Authors :
Alexander Ofori Mensah; Richard Amorin; Harrison Osei
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3R16oon
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7098418
Abstract :
There are many technical challenges
associated with the recovery of valuable condensates from
gas-condensate reservoirs. While some condensates are
immobile far from the production well, others can
accumulate close to the producer wellbore area. As a
result, such valuable condensates are either not produced
or, in some cases, their accumulation might choke the
production well, lowering gas productivity. Maintaining
reservoir pressure has long been a means of dealing with
this problem. This, however, only functions as a
temporary solution because the drop-out and immobile
condensate production continues unabated. In this study,
the effect of injecting brine into a gas-condensate
reservoir at various concentrations was examined using a
numerical simulation approach. It was found that
changing two cations (Ca2+ and Na+
) concentrations could
improve gas-condensate recovery at an injection rate of
490.8 m3
/d (3000 bbl/d). According to this simulation
research, the optimised range of sodium ion
concentration fell between 0.013 and 0.026 mol/L, with
0.013 mol/L (300 ppm) being the optimum value.
Additionally, the low salinity brine injection should have
a Ca2+ content greater than 0.0029 mol/L (116 ppm). It
was also observed that changes in salinity had a negligible
influence on gas recovery. Thus, if recovering lost
condensate is of priority, then this recovery strategy is
highly recommendable.
Keywords :
Condensate Banking; Low Salinity Water Injection; Ion Exchange; Condensate Recovery, Reservoir Geochemistry
There are many technical challenges
associated with the recovery of valuable condensates from
gas-condensate reservoirs. While some condensates are
immobile far from the production well, others can
accumulate close to the producer wellbore area. As a
result, such valuable condensates are either not produced
or, in some cases, their accumulation might choke the
production well, lowering gas productivity. Maintaining
reservoir pressure has long been a means of dealing with
this problem. This, however, only functions as a
temporary solution because the drop-out and immobile
condensate production continues unabated. In this study,
the effect of injecting brine into a gas-condensate
reservoir at various concentrations was examined using a
numerical simulation approach. It was found that
changing two cations (Ca2+ and Na+
) concentrations could
improve gas-condensate recovery at an injection rate of
490.8 m3
/d (3000 bbl/d). According to this simulation
research, the optimised range of sodium ion
concentration fell between 0.013 and 0.026 mol/L, with
0.013 mol/L (300 ppm) being the optimum value.
Additionally, the low salinity brine injection should have
a Ca2+ content greater than 0.0029 mol/L (116 ppm). It
was also observed that changes in salinity had a negligible
influence on gas recovery. Thus, if recovering lost
condensate is of priority, then this recovery strategy is
highly recommendable.
Keywords :
Condensate Banking; Low Salinity Water Injection; Ion Exchange; Condensate Recovery, Reservoir Geochemistry