Managing Deferred Responsibilities: Insights from School Heads’ Experiences


Authors : Arniel L. Sebigan; Remigilda Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4ztshudr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun808

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study investigated the experiences of school heads in managing deferred responsibilities among teachers, particularly focusing on the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they utilize, and the insights they gain from their experiences. A qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews from five school heads. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed five primary challenges that school heads encounter: lack of accountability, difficulty in managing time, motivational barriers, lack of professional support, and gaps in communication. The study also uncovered several coping strategies, including implementing regular follow-ups and check-ins, providing time management training, and establishing clear communication channels to ensure task completion. Key insights from the research highlighted the importance of setting clear expectations, offering supportive leadership, equipping teachers with time management skills, and providing professional development opportunities to improve overall performance. The study suggests that by implementing these strategies, school heads can create a more efficient and productive educational environment that reduces procrastination and enhances teacher accountability. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge on educational leadership and offer practical recommendations for improving task completion in schools.

Keywords : School Leadership, Teacher Procrastination, Accountability, Time Management, Professional Development, Educational Management.

References :

  1. Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2020). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: Underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 273-286.
  2. Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., Tiu, C. J. S., Clarion, C. A., & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 615-626.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Cirillo, F. (2018). The Pomodoro Technique: The Acclaimed Time-Management System That Has Transformed How We Work. Currency. https://www.pomodorotechnique.com/
  5. Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710726136
  6. Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative and iterative approaches to qualitative research. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion, 6, 27-49. Retrieved from http://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc-3688.html
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  8. Decano, R. S. (2021). Procrastination attitude of the senior high school students in modular distance learning modality. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(6), 123-130.
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). DepEd Order No. 11, s. 2020: Revised guidelines on alternative work arrangements in the Department of Education during the period of state of national emergency due to COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/DO_s2020_011.pdf
  12. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2019). Procrastination in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Computer-Based Interventions to Reduce Procrastination. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01402
  13. ERIC Institute. (2019). The relationship among self-regulated learning, procrastination, and learning behavior. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562147.pdf
  14. ERIC Institute. (2020). Prediction of academic procrastination by fear of failure and self-regulation. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1261814.pdf
  15. Finlay, L. (2011). Phenomenology for therapists: Researching the lived world. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119999590
  16. Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2020). Exploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination: An interview study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 377-393.
  17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. SAGE Publications.
  18. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445
  19. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529715587
  20. Jones, I. S., & Blankenship, D. C. (2019). The effect of procrastination on academic performance of online students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(2), 10–15. https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JBD/article/view/2053
  21. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Wong, C. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
  22. Klingsieck, K. B. (2021). Procrastination: When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 26(2), 95-111.
  23. Laybourn, S., Frenzel, A. C., & Fenzl, T. (2019). Teacher procrastination, emotions, and stress: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02325
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  25. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  26. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315820671
  27. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  28. Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Morrow, R. A. (2005). What is a worldview? In Critical Theory and Methodology (pp. 131-145). SAGE Publications.
  30. National Ethical Guidelines for Health Research involving Human Participants (NEGHHR). (2017). Retrieved from https://www.health.gov.ph
  31. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
  32. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  33. Santilli, S., Nota, L., Ginevra, M. C., & Soresi, S. (2020). Career adaptability, hope and life satisfaction in workers with intellectual disability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.006
  34. Scent, C., & Boes, S. R. (2019). Mindfulness and Procrastination: The Mediating Role of Self-compassion and Self-regulation. Mindfulness, 10(3), 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0983-8
  35. Seashore Louis, K., & Murphy, J. (2017). Organizational Learning in Schools. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093761
  36. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  37. Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2020). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), e12544. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12544
  38. Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 889–913. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527462
  39. Tus, J. (2021). Procrastination and academic burnout among grade 12 students in a public school: A correlational study. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(5), 7-15.
  40. van Eerde, W., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2018). Overcoming Procrastination? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies. Educational Research Review, 25, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002

This study investigated the experiences of school heads in managing deferred responsibilities among teachers, particularly focusing on the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they utilize, and the insights they gain from their experiences. A qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews from five school heads. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed five primary challenges that school heads encounter: lack of accountability, difficulty in managing time, motivational barriers, lack of professional support, and gaps in communication. The study also uncovered several coping strategies, including implementing regular follow-ups and check-ins, providing time management training, and establishing clear communication channels to ensure task completion. Key insights from the research highlighted the importance of setting clear expectations, offering supportive leadership, equipping teachers with time management skills, and providing professional development opportunities to improve overall performance. The study suggests that by implementing these strategies, school heads can create a more efficient and productive educational environment that reduces procrastination and enhances teacher accountability. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge on educational leadership and offer practical recommendations for improving task completion in schools.

Keywords : School Leadership, Teacher Procrastination, Accountability, Time Management, Professional Development, Educational Management.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2025

Paper Review Notification
In 2-3 Days

Paper Publishing
In 2-3 Days

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe