Litterfall Production and Species Composition of Forest Types in Cambodia


Authors : Horn Sarun; In Sokra; Rin Chanra; Horn Meta; Touch Pang; Horn Linan

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2acd6trt

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/f547p8fp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14546600

Abstract : Litterfall production and species composition are critical factors in regulating forest ecosystem functions, particularly carbon storage and cycling. This study analyzed litterfall production, seasonality, mass, and carbon content across different forest types and locations in Cambodia. The study was conducted from January to December 2020 in four regions: Tamao Mountain Wildlife Zoo, Mondulkiri, Siem Reap, and the Russey Chrum forest community in Koh Kong, focusing on evergreen, semi-evergreen, and deciduous forests. The dominant species identified at each site were Vatica philastreana, Dipterocarpus obtusifolius, and Parinari annamensis (Tamao); Shorea obtusa, Xylia xylocarpa, and Terminalia alata (Mondulkiri); Streblus asper, Dipterocarpus alatus, and Cleistanthus tomentosus (Siem Reap); and Pternandra caerulescens, Shorea siamensis, and Syzygium lineatum (Koh Kong). Litterfall production varied significantly among forest types, with evergreen forests producing 21,035 kg/ha, semi-evergreen forests 8,662 kg/ha, and deciduous forests 7,059 kg/ha. These findings highlight the variability in litterfall production and species composition across forest types and emphasize their role in forest carbon cycling. Further research is recommended to explore seasonal dynamics and their implications for carbon management strategies.

Keywords : Litterfall Product; Species Composition; Forest Type; Deciduous Forest; Semi-Evergreen Forest; Evergreen Forest.

References :

  1. Ashton, P., & Zhu, H. (2020). The tropical-subtropical evergreen forest transition in East Asia: An exploration. Plant Diversity, 42(4), 255-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.04.001
  2. Bowman, D.M.J.S., Balch, J., Artaxo, P., Bond, W.J., Cochrane, M.A., D’Antonio, C.M., DeFries, R., Johnston, F.H., Keeley, J.E., Krawchuk, M.A., Kull, C.A., Mack, M., Moritz, M.A., Pyne, S., Roos, C.I., Scott, A.C., Sodhi, N.S. and Swetnam, T.W. (2011), The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. Journal of Biogeography, 38: 2223-2236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02595.x
  3. CBNRM Learning Institute (2009). Emerging trends, challenges and innovation for CBNRM in Cambodia (2nd ed.). Phnom Penh: CBNRM Learning Institute.
  4. FAO (2011). State of the world’s forests. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
  5. Giweta, M. (2020). Role of litter production and its decomposition, and factors afffecting the processes in a tropical forest ecosystem: a review. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 44(11): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-0151-2
  6. Heng, S. & Shigeru, I. (2002). Community forestry in northern Cambodia. Kyushu Journal of Forest Research, 3(55): 21–26.
  7. Ishida, A., Diloksumpun, S., Ladpala, P., Staporn, D., Panuthai, S., Gamo, M., Yazaki, K., Ishizuka, M., & Puangchit, L. (2006). Contrasting seasonal leaf habits of canopy trees between tropical dry-deciduous and evergreen forests in Thailand. Tree Physiology, 26(5), 643-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.5.643
  8. Khan, L. (2012). Payment for environmental services (PES): Case study on conservation agreement on forest and biodiversity conservation in central cardamom pretected forest, Tmar Baing district, Koh Kong province. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 3(1): 36–42.
  9. Kim, S., Horn, S., Sok, P., Sien, T. & Yorn, C. (2023). A case study in Koh Kong, Mondulkiri, Preah Vihear, and Siem Reap province. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 14 (2): 61–67.
  10. Krumm F, Rigling A, Bollmann K, Brang P, Dürr C, Gessler A, Schuck A, Schulz-Marty T, Winkel G. (2020). Synthesis: improving biodiversity conservation in European managed forests needs pragmatic, courageous, and regionally-rooted management approaches. In: Krumm F, Schuck A, Rigling A (eds). How to balance forestry and biodiversity conservation – A view across Europe. European Forest Institute (EFI); Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf. Pp. 609–633
  11. MoE (2020). Cambodia forest cover 2018. Ministry of Environment. https://data.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/library_record/cambodia-forest-cover-2018/resource/f8ae592c-32ba-496d-818f-470981ef1810
  12. Motzke, I., Wanger, T. C., Zanre, E., Tscharntke, T. & Barkmann, J. (2012). Socio-economic context of forest biodiversity uses along a town forest gradient in Cambodia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 25: 29‒45.
  13. Somaly, O., Sasaki, N., Kimchhin, S., Tsusaka, T., Shrestha, S. & Malyne, N. (2020). Impact of forest cover change in Phnom Kulen national park on downstream local livelihoods along Siem Reap river, Cambodia. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 11(1): 93–99.
  14. Theilade, I., Phourin, C., Schmidt, L., Meilby, H., van de Bult, M. and Friborg, K.G. (2022), Evergreen Forest types of the central plains in Cambodia: floristic composition and ecological characteristics. Nordic Journal of Botany, 2022: e03494. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03494
  15. Tsujino, R., Kajisa, T., & Yumoto, T. (2019). Causes and history of forest loss in Camodia. International Forestry Review, 21(3): 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293178

Litterfall production and species composition are critical factors in regulating forest ecosystem functions, particularly carbon storage and cycling. This study analyzed litterfall production, seasonality, mass, and carbon content across different forest types and locations in Cambodia. The study was conducted from January to December 2020 in four regions: Tamao Mountain Wildlife Zoo, Mondulkiri, Siem Reap, and the Russey Chrum forest community in Koh Kong, focusing on evergreen, semi-evergreen, and deciduous forests. The dominant species identified at each site were Vatica philastreana, Dipterocarpus obtusifolius, and Parinari annamensis (Tamao); Shorea obtusa, Xylia xylocarpa, and Terminalia alata (Mondulkiri); Streblus asper, Dipterocarpus alatus, and Cleistanthus tomentosus (Siem Reap); and Pternandra caerulescens, Shorea siamensis, and Syzygium lineatum (Koh Kong). Litterfall production varied significantly among forest types, with evergreen forests producing 21,035 kg/ha, semi-evergreen forests 8,662 kg/ha, and deciduous forests 7,059 kg/ha. These findings highlight the variability in litterfall production and species composition across forest types and emphasize their role in forest carbon cycling. Further research is recommended to explore seasonal dynamics and their implications for carbon management strategies.

Keywords : Litterfall Product; Species Composition; Forest Type; Deciduous Forest; Semi-Evergreen Forest; Evergreen Forest.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe