Authors : Eghuanoye Ikata; Godspower O. Ashaka

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4whwznh8

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ysuscdr2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul835

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : In certain discussions of acoustic wave propagation, assumptions are introduced that lead to a linear approximation of the governing equations. Implicit in such assumptions is the notion of smallness of a parameter, the size of which is rarely given. We here give a value for the parameter, using a numerical procedure. This study models acoustic wave propagation in air, using a nonlinear acoustic wave equation in one space dimension, by a Riemann invariant based method of characteristics. We simulate propagation of a particle velocity wavelet along a straight pipe, closed at one end and open at the other. The initial amplitude of the wavelet lies between 0.1 and 200 m/s, assuming free space propagation. Data from the computation is analysed by exploiting the known ‘steepening’ of a part of the wavelet in finite-amplitude wave propagation. We have calculated the slope of that part of the wavelet, at various times, for wavelets of different initial amplitudes. The results show clearly a demarcation between linear- and nonlinear-acoustic wave propagation (that is, a demarcation between finite-amplitude and small-amplitude wave propagation.) This demarcation is controlled by the opposing influences of energy loss and nonlinear effects. For an acoustic wavelet, the initial amplitude 50 m/s in terms of particle velocity (or 0.02 m in terms of particle displacement, or 0.15 in terms of acoustic Mach number) marks the upper limit beyond which nonlinear effects cannot be ignored. That is how small the size of the initial disturbance should be, for the assumptions made while deriving a linear wave equation to be valid.

Keywords : Finite-Amplitude Wave; Method of Characteristics; Nonlinear Acoustic Wave Equation.

References :

1. Ikata, Eghuanoye 2008 J. Nig. Assoc. Math. Phys. 13 161
2. Ikata E and Tay G 1998 IL Nuovo Cimento 20D(12) 1779
3. Ikata, Eghuanoye 2010 J. Nig. Assoc. Math. Phys. 17 197
4. Chester C R 1971 Techniques in Partial Differential Equations (Tokyo: McGraw-Hill) p.49
5. Kinsler L E, Frey A R, Coppens A B and Sanders J V 1982 Fundamentals of Acoustics, 3^rd ed. (New York: John Wiley) p. 100 – 102
6. Symon K R 1979 Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Reading, MSS: Addison-Wesley) p. 330 – 331
7. Beyer R T 1974 Nonlinear Acoustics (USA Department of Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command) Chapters 3 & 4
8. Debnath, Lokenath 2005 Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers, 2^nd ed. (Boston, USA: Birkhauser) Chapters 6 & 7
9. Lighthill J 1978 Waves in Fluids (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 76 – 85
10. Olver P J 2014 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations (Heidelberg, Switzerland: Springer) Section 2.3
11. Schiesser W E and Silebi C A 1997 Computational Transport Phenomena (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Part 1, M3
12. Chow C- Y 1983 An Introduction to Computational Fluid Mechanics, corrected ed. (Boulder, CO: Seminole Publishers) Section 2.14
13. Coulson C A and Jeffrey A 1988 Waves – A Mathematical Approach to the Common Types of Wave Motion, 2^nd ed. (Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical) Chapter 9
14. White F M 2006 Viscous Fluid Flow, 3^rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill) p. 55
15. Lapidus L and Pinder G F 1999 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering (New York: John Wiley) Section 1.2.3
16. Ferziger J H 1998 Numerical Methods for Engineering Applications (New York: John Wiley) Section 8.2
17. Bukiet B, Pelesko J, Li X L and Sachdev P L 1996 Computers Math. Applic. 31(7) 75-97
18. Nei Y, Fu K and Lv X 2018 Hindawi Advances in Mathematical Physics vol 2018, ID 3469534, 10pages
19. Chapra S C and Canale R P 2010 Numerical Methods for Engineers, 6^th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill) p. 489
20. Morton K W and Mayers D F 1994 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p.88
21. Borisov A A, Vakhgel’t A F and Nakoryakov V E 1980 Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki I Teknicheskoi Fiziki No 5 33-38 (English Trans.)
22. Bird R B, Stewart W E and Lightfoot E N 2005 Transport Phenomena, 2^nd ed. (Singapore: John Wiley Asia) p. 11 – 37
23. Butkov, Eugene 1968 Mathematical Physics (Reading, MSS: Addison-Wesley) p. 320.